Jump to content

SkySurveyBanner.jpg.21855908fce40597655603b6c9af720d.jpg

processing help


Anthonyexmouth

Recommended Posts

Hi, been away from imaginig for a mere 6 months but forgotten the little I had learnt.

Could someone take a look at this and advise me how to best process this. At the moment I only have DSS, APP and GIMP. Can't remember how to remove the light pollution or gradient. 

Many thanks. Also, any advice on what is wrong with the data itself would be appreciated. Can provide all raw data if anyone is bored. lol

 

Autosave.tif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a preliminary stretch in Gimp to see what is there:

Screenshot_1.jpg.b9502bc1fc4761f0bee7f23d39e00290.jpg

There is quite a bit of gradient that needs to be removed. I don't remove gradients in Gimp - I use my own tool for that. I'll do it later and post results (and tool if someone wants to use it - it is plugin for ImageJ).

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi

Here are the stretched, darkened-blurred, mask and final images. To lose the gradient, subtract the blur from the stretched, then process it to taste. 

HTH

EDIT: don't forget to mask the stars before you stretch any more;)

ss2.jpg.eb4d6755ce455dd3aa2a91ae5de1afb4.jpgss3.jpg.618101151f820d0f333bb336c68bcd02.jpg

ss4.jpg.53096c4ea9da8077dfb53c9cbb00811d.jpgas.jpg.dfe4e10c704df077be45b1a64f535486.jpg

Edited by alacant
forgot the mask
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, alacant said:

Hi

Here are the stretched, darkened-blurred, mask and final images. To lose the gradient, subtract the blur from the stretched, then process it to taste. 

HTH

EDIT: don't forget to mask the stars before you stretch any more;)

ss2.jpg.eb4d6755ce455dd3aa2a91ae5de1afb4.jpgss3.jpg.618101151f820d0f333bb336c68bcd02.jpg

ss4.jpg.53096c4ea9da8077dfb53c9cbb00811d.jpgas.jpg.dfe4e10c704df077be45b1a64f535486.jpg

that looks really nice, can you tell me the process and software used. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, geeklee said:

Here's some work in APP Anthony as you mentioned that software.  Just Light Pollution Removal and resize (50%) + rotate.  Saved with the 15%, 3 Sigma, 0.0% base DDP stretch (so a bit much prob!)

Autosave__1_-lpc-cbg--90degCW-0.5x-LZ3-NS-St.thumb.jpg.cb8f690cafddb1e4299af0d8bd80d220.jpg

thanks, with the tools in APP i've never really understood where the requested boxes should be placed on the image. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Anthonyexmouth said:

thanks, with the tools in APP i've never really understood where the requested boxes should be placed on the image. 

I've found with this type of shot, it's difficult as you want to generally get background sky and there's a lot of nebulosity around.  I did the following which is massively simplified but reduces gradient quickly - but probably loses some faint good stuff too!  The tool is so good, you can experiment easily enough.

image.png.71cb3a020f3990cf065ae7ecd85a8df5.png

Red boxes it thinks might be wrong, so only leave if you're sure.  Yellow ones, be careful of but (as stated by the author in a video/post I've seen) there could always be some.

Edited by geeklee
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I often notice when stretching the image that vignetting seems biased to one side, is there a way to correct this every easily on the SW ED80? Is it a collimation issue or just a result of the stock focuser? 

 

Also, had another go with APP and ended up with this. Seem to have a few large dust motes but looking at the optics I can't see any specks. Really annoying. 

flame2.thumb.jpg.54be91592e51ad9eb23214b45dbd2392.jpg

Edited by Anthonyexmouth
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Anthonyexmouth said:

Also, had another go with APP and ended up with this. Seem to have a few large dust motes but looking at the optics I can't see any specks. Really annoying. 

That is issue with calibration procedure. Probably faulty application of darks. If you used dark optimization it could produce this effect.

Btw - dust will be on sensor / filters and not on telescope optics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, vlaiv said:

That is issue with calibration procedure. Probably faulty application of darks. If you used dark optimization it could produce this effect.

Btw - dust will be on sensor / filters and not on telescope optics.

Would that be dark optimisation in DSS or APP?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gave this a go in PI - there's not much in terms of SNR between the fainter areas of nebulosity so a bit more exposure time will help that, but it's otherwise fairly clean data. Vignetting might be tilt, in which case you can get a tilt adapter for T2 trains - Teleskop Express do one - but it isn't significant and if you do flat fielding correctly should calibrate out nicely. Same goes for the dust motes, though cleaning is always preferable!

Autosave_DBE_ABE_DBE.thumb.jpg.2bbdc78b5d53fd7a138bb80093d53ac4.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, discardedastro said:

Gave this a go in PI - there's not much in terms of SNR between the fainter areas of nebulosity so a bit more exposure time will help that, but it's otherwise fairly clean data. Vignetting might be tilt, in which case you can get a tilt adapter for T2 trains - Teleskop Express do one - but it isn't significant and if you do flat fielding correctly should calibrate out nicely. Same goes for the dust motes, though cleaning is always preferable!

Autosave_DBE_ABE_DBE.thumb.jpg.2bbdc78b5d53fd7a138bb80093d53ac4.jpg

Thats good to know, I was running 3min subs on this with my 294mc pro. would longer subs be beneficial? don't want to swamp it or just more of them? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Anthonyexmouth said:

Thats good to know, I was running 3min subs on this with my 294mc pro. would longer subs be beneficial? don't want to swamp it or just more of them? 

Just more of them, I think, though hard to say without seeing an individual sub.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Anthonyexmouth said:

Would that be dark optimisation in DSS or APP?

The one you used to calibrate / stack resulting image that shows dust shadows.

I'm guessing that you used same data as first stack. First stack does not show any issues with flat calibration - which means flats are fine.

Dark optimization works by scaling darks - something that you can do only if you use bias files and bias are stable enough (this seems not to be the case with CMOS sensors / cameras as far as I can tell). For this reason it is best to turn this option off as it can cause issues with flat calibration.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, vlaiv said:

The one you used to calibrate / stack resulting image that shows dust shadows.

I'm guessing that you used same data as first stack. First stack does not show any issues with flat calibration - which means flats are fine.

Dark optimization works by scaling darks - something that you can do only if you use bias files and bias are stable enough (this seems not to be the case with CMOS sensors / cameras as far as I can tell). For this reason it is best to turn this option off as it can cause issues with flat calibration.

 

just checked DSS and dark optimisation was unchecked. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Anthonyexmouth said:

just checked DSS and dark optimisation was unchecked. 

What software did you use to stack this with?

flame2.jpg

Maybe you did not load calibration files? This image shows both issues with flats - dust shadows and issues with darks - there is amp glow visible in top right corner.

This could happen if you forgot to add calibration files or like I said, dark optimization was turned on for stacking and messed up dark calibration (hence both flat problems and visible amp glow).

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, vlaiv said:

What software did you use to stack this with?

flame2.jpg

Maybe you did not load calibration files? This image shows both issues with flats - dust shadows and issues with darks - there is amp glow visible in top right corner.

This could happen if you forgot to add calibration files or like I said, dark optimization was turned on for stacking and messed up dark calibration (hence both flat problems and visible amp glow).

 

If that was the autosave.tiff then DSS, otherwise it may be either DSS or APP thats then been tweaked in Gimp. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.