Jump to content

SkySurveyBanner.jpg.21855908fce40597655603b6c9af720d.jpg

M37


alan4908

Recommended Posts

The open cluster M37 contains almost 2000 stars and is spread across 20 light years. Most of the stars are young blue/white but it also contains red giant orange suns which provide considerable colour contrast.  I first imaged M37 a couple of years ago but I decided to add to the data since I was never entirely happy about the quality of the some of the sub-frames.  I also decided to try out some of my newly learnt stellar processing techniques to improve the data which I describe below for anyone that might be interested. 

Since I often image in non-ideal conditions, I sometimes find that the red stacked channel has a larger FWHM values than the blue or green channels, if I combine this data to obtain an RGB image. the result is a red fringe around the stars. For blue stars, this is particularly apparent and creates magenta halos. This time, I decided to shrink the red channel via a ring mask using PI's erosion filter.  The ring mask protects the star core, minimizing damage and core dimming.  The main issue is generating a good ring mask which captures the majority of the red fringing. After watching one of the Adam Block's Pixinsight's tutorials ( https://adamblockstudios.com/) on how to de-emphase stars, I decided to apply a technique he recommends.  Basically, you first create a star mask which includes all the stars and all the halos. This mask should be white across the star and halo and slightly feathered around the edges.   Having done this, you then subtract from this the Red channel lum information to create the ring mask. The reason this creates an accurate ring mask is that the lum data contains accurate information on how the light profile various from the stars center. So, for example, at the stars core, the star mask will be close to 1 (in PI everything is normalised to 1), whilst the lum information will also be close to 1, so if you subtract one from the other you end up with something that is close to 0 (eg black) at the core.  Thus, at the core you will be protecting the star's core almost 100%. Outside of the star mask (eg outside of the halos) you will have 0, whilst in the lum channel you might have 0.2 (say representing a non-stellar structure), if you subtract 0.2 from 0 you get 0, since you cannot have negative values in PI, so outside the star mask the ring mask will be 0 eg black. Within the halo, the ring mask will mimic the stars halo hence generating an accurate ring mask.   

The LRGB image below was taken with my Esprit 150 and represents just over 15 hours integration time.

Alan

558898281_7Final.thumb.jpg.1335dcc272118764e4448e2a200c47ef.jpg

LIGHTS: L:23, R:26, G:23, B:21 x 600s, BIAS:100, DARKS:30, FLATS:40 all at -20C.

  • Like 16
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Adreneline said:

An awesome result Alan - the time and effort invested has really paid off. Love the colours and the clarity of the whole image.

Excellent!

Adrian

Thanks Adrian 

18 hours ago, Sunshine said:

Is that ever beautiful! one can stare into such an image and get lost in all the detail, such fine points of light.

Thanks  :hello:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alan,

 

Great job on the use of the technique. I appreciate you taking it to heart. As I mentioned in my tutorials on this- even if you do not like outcomes of combinatorial means of processing an image (I used this "trick" as part of a larger thing to de-emphasize stars)- sometimes the individual small methods are useful in and of themselves. 

-Adam

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, ngc1535 said:

Alan,

 

Great job on the use of the technique. I appreciate you taking it to heart. As I mentioned in my tutorials on this- even if you do not like outcomes of combinatorial means of processing an image (I used this "trick" as part of a larger thing to de-emphasize stars)- sometimes the individual small methods are useful in and of themselves. 

-Adam

Thanks for the comment Adam :hello:

Alan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.