Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

stargazine_ep24_banner.thumb.jpg.56e65b9c9549c15ed3f06e146fc5f5f1.jpg

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

For a long time I wanted to shoot this frame, probably from the early days of my astrophotography adventure.

Finally after all these years I managed to get a decent result of the 'stuff' between these two beautiful nebulae. Fairly happy with the image but always looking for improvement.

I hope one day to redo this all with a mono camera and filters. 

Apart from NGC1499 , M45 and the Baby Eagle Nebula no idea what else is in the picture. If you happen to have an idea feel free to educate me.

 

Some info on image and capturing:

Widefield Pleiades to California.

Taken over 2 nights with a total of 11hrs 25min integration.  

With a stock Nikon d610 and Nikkor 85mm 1.8 objective.

Tracking was done with the Skywatcher Star Adventurer.

Lights and all calibrations frames were stacked in DSS.

Processing was done in Adobe Photoshop CC using Adobe Raw, GradientXterminator plugin, HLVG plugin, Nik software plugins and Photokemi action set.

 

Ken

126656283_widefieldpleiadescalif11hr25neweditB.thumb.jpg.0149e6bc7d7fd0bd66045e75d31a7b00.jpg

 

  • Like 30

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Outstanding image and a quality level of detail I’d love to achieve, great to see what can be produced with 11+ hours. 

Im lucky to get 2 hours of clear weather in a week at the moment.

well done. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that is a great image, so natural looking.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lovely image.  As already said, very natural looking.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very nicely done!!  Deep with great range and not overblown.  Lovely image  :)

Paul

As other noted 'natural'.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Around Atik either side there is LDN 1468, 1470, 1471, 1472.
Atik is the top star of the bright pair in the centre.

To the right of Atik is IC 348 bluish nebulosity.

LBN 785 bottom right of centre blue cone shape.

Edited by wxsatuser
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

An absolutely stunning image, gorgeous !!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gorgeous image.

Bob.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Awesome!

Did you have the aperture stopped back at all, or was it taken at 1.8?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, adyj1 said:

Awesome!

Did you have the aperture stopped back at all, or was it taken at 1.8?

Just had a look at the raw and I stopped down to f4 and used iso 400 on the camera. At f1.8 the lens has some coma in the corners and a good amount of vignette.

At f2.8 the coma is mostly removed but I'm not too happy with the amount of vignette. f4 did the trick for me.

Ken

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ooh Ken, that is so beautiful!
           thtoppoints.gif.47be2f48cc0314cc4db55dea4554caa7.gif

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Ken Mitchell said:

Just had a look at the raw and I stopped down to f4 and used iso 400 on the camera. At f1.8 the lens has some coma in the corners and a good amount of vignette.

At f2.8 the coma is mostly removed but I'm not too happy with the amount of vignette. f4 did the trick for me.

Ken

Thanks a lot for the info - I have a Walimex 85mm 1.8 and this gives me a good starting point... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, adyj1 said:

Thanks a lot for the info - I have a Walimex 85mm 1.8 and this gives me a good starting point... 

No problem.

I've never used the Walimex though, so you'll have to do some test for yourself to determine it's best f stop. I imagine there will be some differences but from what I've read it's a really good astro lens and many shoot wide open with it, even better :) 

Ken

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Sidecontrol
      Hi Everyone,
       
      Not posted some images since my introduction in the welcome section.  With the dark nights finally back here in Scotland I thought Id share some of the DSOs I managed to capture back in Feb-April just before the light nights rolled in at the start of May.
       
      These were all stacked and edited in PixInsight.  
      1.  The Running Man and Orion Nebula - less than an hour of integration time (SA pro + fuji 55-200mm lens).
      2. Bodes and Cigar Galaxy - Less than an hour of integration time ( SA pro + SW 72 ED telescope). 
      3. Flame, Horsehead, Running Man and Orion Nebula - Less than an hour of integration time (SA pro + fuji 55-200mm lens).
      4. Pinwheel Galaxy - 35 mins integration time (SA pro + SW 72 ED telescope).
      5  Whirlpool Galaxy - 21 mins integration time (SA pro + SW 72 ED telescope). 
      6.  Andromeda Galaxy - 1.5 minutes integration time (Move Shoot Move + fuji 55-200mm lens).  
       






    • By KevinPSJ
      M45 Pleiades. Captured using Nikon D3200 at prime focus of Skywatcher 150P on EQ3-2 with RA motor tracking (no guiding). Total of 79 x 10s subs at ISO 800 aligned and stacked in DeepSkyStacker to give 7min 20s. Processed in StarTools.
      Thin and high cloud for some of the subs. Taken at 3:30am on Sunday morning Aug 30, 2020.
    • By mcg_photogrpahy
      Hello everybody. My last imaging session left odd looking star trials in my photos, almost like a clockwise motion. My polar alignment and balance were good, so I am not sure why this issue is occuring. Below is an attached video of me scrolling through my subs. Any help/ advice would be greatly appreciated!
      IMG_7102.mov
    • By Starbuddypal
      I'm trying to get a photo of Jupiter and Saturn with my Nikon D3000 DSLR but I can't get anything clear. I attached the kind of photos I'm getting with my camera. They end up being too bright and no distinguishable features show up. Is it even possible for my Nikon to get photos of planetary objects like Saturn and Jupiter?

    • By Blackware
      I just got into observing and would love to be able to take a picture of what I'm seeing. I got an old Nikon D60 from 2012? laying here still working perfectly with multiple lenses. I did some research and found I should buy some kind of T-ring as an adapter between the telescope and camera. Is this the only thing I need to take an image ? 
      Thanks in advance!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.