Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_30_second_exp_2_winners.thumb.jpg.b5430b40547c40d344fd4493776ab99f.jpg

vlaiv

Cheapest setup for SNR5 "standard"

Recommended Posts

I'm sort of trying to invent some criteria for "speed" of live stacking rig and I came up with SNR5 "standard".

I'll briefly describe what that "standard" is and how it is calculated and want to see what rigs satisfy it - as being at least SNR5 capable, and how much such rigs would cost - not including computer, but including scope, mount, camera and all bits and pieces needed to tie it up together and make it work (well maybe not power source and things like that?).

Here is what goes into SNR5 "standard" - it is rig that:

1. has at least one degree diagonal coverage of the sky

2. has sampling rate around 1.5"/px (I guess we can say +/- 0.2 or so but I think we really want to say at least 1.5"/px or if we allow it to go higher - at least 1.6"/px - lower res benefits SNR but looses detail, and in reality it is unlikely that we will achieve higher detail than 1.5"/px with these setups).

3. Is capable of doing color rendering of the target

4. Needs to achieve SNR of at least 5 in following conditions:

- one minute total exposure in 4s subs

- in 20mag skies

- of 20mag target

(20/20 - easy to remember)

Calculations include following:

Mag 0 sky / target produce 880000 photons per second. All telescope losses are accounted for - This means we calculate clear aperture (central obstruction is subtracted if present, mirror reflectivity is accounted for, and glass transmission also). QE of sensor is taken to be 40% of that declared to be max QE and final result is multiplied by 1.41 - this is because of the way color sensors work and the way we can obtain Luminance layer from the data (we have two pixels of green color - hence 1.41 factor, green is about 1/3 as sensitive as peak QE, but other two channels contribute as well so we use 0.4 instead of 0.33 - this is rough estimate but enough for "standard"). For mono sensors + filters - only mono is used and "average" QE is used (this means if peak QE is 80% we will use something like 60-65% depending on where endpoints sit).

Read noise which can be achieved is used - not baseline, since anyone doing 4s exposures is likely to use high gain. If there is binning - we will treat it as software binning and read noise is increased with factor of "base" of binned pixels - for 2x2 binning - we have x2 read noise, for 3x3 binning - we have x3 read noise and so on....

Dark current is also taken into account - either at -10C if cooled camera is used or 25C if regular camera is used.

Here is my candidate:

EQ3 class mount

130PDS + CC

ASI294 cooled model.

This combination will achieve SNR5 with no binning.

Working resolution is 1.46"/px, assumed peak QE is 80% (although ZWO says it is TBD, I read somewhere that it is estimated to 80%) - so used QE was 0.32. I used CO of 36% (47mm) and mirror reflectivity of 94%. I also used read noise of 1.4 (although it can go down to 1.2e according to ZWO - I wanted to be safe there).

In any case stack of 15x4s subs gives SNR of 3.583 and multiplying that with 1.41 gives 5.05

All of that for only 1999.99e :D (give or take)

Can we do this cheaper?

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

HI Vlaiv, I don't think it can be done cheaper or that there are many reasonable setups that can even achieve "SNR5", but I think that some of your criteria are very strict.

Take for example the FOV. Although it would be nice to have 1°, this excludes smaller sensors, while most dso's are not bigger than 0.5°.

Then there is the sampling rate. While 1.5"/px, is where the seeing  limits you for decent AP under moderate skies, I feel that eeva is all about speed, so a bit of undersampling (up to 4"/px works fine with me) could be allowed.

As for the scope, F/5 would be OK, and we should really aim for workable (minimum aberrations) subF/4.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, R26 oldtimer said:

HI Vlaiv, I don't think it can be done cheaper or that there are many reasonable setups that can even achieve "SNR5", but I think that some of your criteria are very strict.

Take for example the FOV. Although it would be nice to have 1°, this excludes smaller sensors, while most dso's are not bigger than 0.5°.

Then there is the sampling rate. While 1.5"/px, is where the seeing  limits you for decent AP under moderate skies, I feel that eeva is all about speed, so a bit of undersampling (up to 4"/px works fine with me) could be allowed.

As for the scope, F/5 would be OK, and we should really aim for workable (minimum aberrations) subF/4.

Now when I think about it - it is rather strict isn't it?

What do you think should be reasonable criteria?

Should we still maintain SNR5 20/20 in one minute or relax it in terms of SNR, or time achieved or something else? And what should be criteria on FOV and resolution?

I mean - I've figured out really fast setup but it fails on couple of my points above. AzGTI + Samyang 135mm F/2 + ASI178mc cooled.

It is 3.67"/px and FOV is something like 3° x 2°

That one is SNR8 for 20 / 20 / 15 x 4s exposures. If we swap cooled for regular ASI178mc (as cooled is no longer produced and to save some cash) we are looking at about 1300e and SNR7 (assuming dark current as high as 1e/s/px - although I have no idea what it might actually be - I doubt it is as high as that).

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Vlaiv, sorry for the late response.

On 02/02/2020 at 23:20, vlaiv said:

And what should be criteria on FOV and resolution?

I've seen very good results with resolution as low as 3-4 "/px , and certainly a  FoV of 0.5° is pretty much decent.

So, one can use small sensitive sensors ( like zwo asi224, zwo asi290, lodestarX2c) with small focal lengths (telephotos/ 60,70,80mm refractors (preferably ed) with or without 0.5 reducer/ small newts 114p/500 or 130p/650 or heritage) on a small mount (like the azgti or eq3goto).

Or go to a camera with a bigger sensor (like zwo asi294 or atik infinity) with a bigger focal length (<4" triplet refractors/ sct's with 0.6 focal reducers / 6"f5, 8"f4 or even faster newtonians like the sharpstar F2.8 or the Tak ε-180) on a bigger mount.

On 02/02/2020 at 15:05, vlaiv said:

4. Needs to achieve SNR of at least 5 in following conditions:

- one minute total exposure in 4s subs

Although my lodestar shows almost everything in a minute, it is a bit noisy and have to give it 2-3mins for faint targets. Also the cmos cameras, even the very sensitive 224, needs more time to build up a decent image, so I think the total exposure limit, would be better at 2-3mins. Still very fast and still eeva in my book but as they say, YMMV.

As for the subexposure length, again I find it varies greatly depending on the target and usage of UHC or NB filter, so no need to restrict that as long as you've set a total integration time.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.