Jump to content

SkySurveyBanner.jpg.21855908fce40597655603b6c9af720d.jpg

"Brushed" Stacking / processing artifact - nature or software ??


Recommended Posts

Evening all,

Just going through some old data-sets whilst the clouds rule the skies and I have found an artifact that is appearing on my DSLR  (600D modded)  stacked images.

Here is the evidence....

Light sub (120s ISO 800)_MG_4375-St.thumb.jpg.bf642cafe45c67664193d45d04fc5422.jpg

Stacked image below   Left one  straight out of APP (  ...80 subs......  no bias or darks or flats on this run but the effect still shows up when I include them.....)

Stacked image below   Right one...... after various magics in PS  has been applied.....  Gradient exterminator ..... stretching routines  etc......

Rosette btw... but some of you probably guessed that already..

St-avg-9520.0s-NR-x_1.0_LZ3-NS-full-eq-add-sc_BWMV_nor-AAD-RE-noMBB-St.thumb.jpg.bbc359974a791e07b64b4a3b6ff1bac1.jpg186818804_rOSETTESt-avg-9520.0s-NR-x_1.0_LZ3-NS-full-eq-add-sc_BWMV_nor-AAD-RE-noMBB-St.thumb.jpg.7687ecb8777dc6045a42ba9b548afcb5.jpg


so if you zoom in on the right hand one  (the one stacked in APP and processed in PS),  you get this brushed effect.... 

348975647_ZOOMEDIN.jpg.16980c0ae81af6561c10238fc8e68ed9.jpg

There is no evidence of the striations if you zoom into the freshly stacked image..... only poor star shapes....!!!!

EDIT:  !!!!!    Now I have looked a bit more closely  ... there does appear to be evidence of it on the 'just stacked' image 

Anybody know of what is causing this ??  Is a STACKING  artifact ??  Is it the slight movement of the star-field across the 80 subs etc??     Is it cloud passing on the individual frames ??

Can it be removed ??

Any help much appreciated.   (  please keep it simple  !!... no Pixinsight de-convoluted integrated subtraction layer vectoring suggestions..... 😖  )

 

Sean.

 

Edited by Craney
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks like walking noise.  As I understand it, it's a stacking artefact resulting from a gradual movement of the guiding scope/camera relative to the imaging train.  Can be caused by mirror movement in reflectors, Viton tipped screws in the guider clamps or half a dozen other possible micron sized shifts.

Getting rid of it in post processing never fully worked for me, although clamping everything down hard helped a bit, but what really fixed it was moving to an off axis guider.

Nice Rosette, by the way. 

Edited by almcl
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the comment @almcl,

I'm thinking back to the set up I had operational at the time..... ( These pics were taken sometime in November 2019).   I normally have a a decent  sized refractor as the GUIDE.  (  Bresser 102mm or sometimes my 80mm Equinox).  These are both quite weighty and I had them on one of those SW guiding mount thingys....

Image result for skywatcher guiding bracket

It has often crossed my mind that these must have a max load capacity and that the axes cannot be locked.... I wonder whether this is the source of the relative drift......🤔

Thanks again...

Sean.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, tooth_dr said:

.... but if I dither between exposures, it isn't there......

Thanks Adam,

Ironically I have dithered over dithering.   I  understand the concept, but have discretely pulled the rug over it.  Getting my mount  and camera to synchronise their activities may require me to step aside and read a few manuals......yikes...  as I get older, this sensible approach to solving the problem seems to take a back seat.    (... must try harder.....)

I tend to find with all this astro -stuff,  I only make progress when faced with a real dilemma or en-passe. 

I just wish I had more time and clear nights to maintain a two steps forward / one step backward ratio !!!

Cheers for the input.   OK.  Let's try a Dither....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can dither by hand, if you don't guide, but it's a royal pain. You have to sit by the mount all night. Been there, done that, never wanted the t-shirt.

Edited by wimvb
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.