Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

jambouk

Two batteries, one panel

Recommended Posts

I asked a few weeks ago about charging two batteries from one solar panel. I’ve now got a solar controller which can do this, see below, but I’m confused by the instruction manual, especially how I should set the “charging priority”. I assumed the unit would charge battery 1 until full, then move on and charge battery 2 until full, then go back to 1. I’m not sure what this charging priority is - image of the relevant page from the manual below. I’d be grateful to hear what you think it means.

Thanks.

James.

6726E601-6072-4A3B-AB09-3BC3FF4765BE.jpeg

1A8311DF-94FC-4700-95A5-7F4C5F017954.jpeg

Edited by jambouk
New title
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As I see it 2 battery must be the same  to set this like 2 gel as you can only put 1 number in ,   it look for the low battery and send more to the low one I set as 50/50  it spit the solar by 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It looks like the default priority of 9 will be like you assumed. If your solar panel delivers 1A for example, then battery 1 will get 900mA and battery 2  will get 100mA. When battery 1 is fully charged battery 2 will then get all the current. If battery 1 starts discharging then it will go back to the priority setting currents again.

It doesn't say what happens to battery 2 when both are fully charged. Hopefully it stops charging like battery 1 does when it is fully charged.

If the normal load on battery 2 is higher than battery 1 then you can lower the priority number so that battery 2 gets a bigger share of the solar panel current.

If you set it to priority 5 they will each get half the solar panel current.

All four of your batteries need to be of the same type. I assume they are from your previous post. Just different capacities. Battery 1 can be your 2 60Ah in parallel and Battery 2 can be your 2 50Ah in parallel. Or vice-versa. :smile: 

Alan

Edited by symmetal
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks.

I've ditched the two batteries in series idea for the time being, and just going to stick two big batteries in isolation,one connected to each of the outputs of the dual solar charger.

If the two batteries are the same, and the load placed on each is the same, would you set the charging priority to 50:50? I'm still not really sure why the maximum I can send to battery one is 90%, and why I can't send 100% to battery one until its fully charged, then send 100% of power to battery two etc.  Or is it sending 10% to battery two by default to at least put a bit of power into battery two to prevent it from degrading whilst battery one charges up?

James

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In the situation where you had a significant load on both batteries you may end up with battery 1 not reaching full charge and if you had that set to 100% priority then battery 2 would never get charged. 90/10 priority ensures battery 2 would at least get some charge. Once one battery is fully charged the other one gets the 100% charge anyway from the solar panel.

If the load on both batteries is similar then a 50/50 priority may be best to avoid battery 2 not receiving enough charge on dull/short days. If the solar panel puts out enough to comfortably charge both batteries then the priority is not really important.

Alan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By MalVeauX
      Hey all,
      I made an acquisition and processing tutorial a while back (3 years ago? Yikes!) and it is fairly dated in terms of what I'm doing these days. I've been asked for a long time to make a new one showing what I'm doing these days. Specifically how I'm processing a single shot image for both the surface and prominences and how to process them together to show prominences and the surface at once. I've abandoned doing split images and composites and strictly work from one image using layers. Acquisition does not use gamma at all anymore. Nothing terribly fancy, but it's not exactly intuitive so hopefully this new video will illustrate most of the fundamentals to get you started. Instead of an hour, this time it's only 18 minutes. It's real time from start to finish. I'm sorry for the long "waiting periods" where I'm just waiting for the software to finish its routine, it lasts 1.5 minutes and 30 seconds tops typically at first. The first 4 minutes is literally just stacking & alignment in AS!3. I typically will go faster than this, but wanted to slow down enough to try to talk through what I'm doing as I do it. Hopefully you can see each action on the screen. I may have made a few mistakes or said a few incorrect things or terms, forgive me for that, this is not my day job. I really hope it helps folk get more into processing as its not difficult or intimidating when you see a simple process with only a few things that are used. The key is good data to begin with and a good exposure value. Today's data came from a 100mm F10 achromatic refractor and an ASI290MM camera with an HA filter. I used FireCapture to acquire the data with a defocused flat frame. No gamma is used. I target anywhere from 65% to 72% histogram fill. That's it! The processing is fast and simple. I have a few presets that I use, but they are all defaults in Photoshop. A lot of the numbers I use for parameters are based on image scale, so keep that in mind, experiment with your own values. The only preset I use that is not a default is my coloring scheme. I color with levels in Photoshop, and my values are Red: 1.6, Green 0.8, Blue 0.2 (these are mid-point values).
      Processing Tutorial Video (18 minutes):
      https://youtu.be/RJvJEoVS0oU
      RAW (.TIF) files available here to practice on (the same images you will see below as RAW TIFs):
      https://drive.google.com/open?id=1zjeoux7YPZpGjlRGtX6fH7CH2PhB-dzv
      Video for Acquisition, Focus, Flat Calibration and Exposure (20 minutes):
      (Please let me know if any links do not work)
      ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
      ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
      Results from today using this work flow method.
      Colored:




      B&W:




      SSM data (sampled during 1.5~2 arc-second seeing conditions):

      Equipment for today:
      100mm F10 Frac (Omni XLT 120mm F8.3 masked to 4")
      Baader Red CCD-IR Block Filter (ERF)
      PST etalon + BF10mm
      ASI290MM
      SSM (for fun, no automation)


      Very best,
       
    • By jambouk
      If I have one solar panel, and four 12v batteries I need to be charged, two pairs of equal age and capacity (60 amp hour x 2, and 50 amp hour x 2) and the pairs have the same resting voltage and seemingly the same capacity, and I can get a solar charger unit which can charge two batteries (see link below), I was thinking of charging each pair in parallel.
      I've read about the risks of charging in parallel, with the weaker battery having the dominant impact and bringing the other battery down to its capacity, but in reality, how likely is this to be a problem in the course of 5 years, where the batteries won't be used that much anyway, maybe discharged 20%, just 10 times a year? 
      I'm conscious there is scope to discuss lots of things around this, like "buy pairs of new batteries rather than starting out with old ones" and "buy larger capacity new batteries etc", but this is the set up we have and will be sticking with.
      Thanks for any replies.
      James
      https://uk.rs-online.com/web/p/solar-power-regulators/9054536?cm_mmc=UK-PLA-DS3A-_-google-_-PLA_UK_EN_Power_Supplies_And_Transformers-_-Renewable_Energy|Solar_Power_Regulators-_-PRODUCT_GROUP&matchtype=&pla-391749164546&s_kwcid=AL!7457!3!243856857002!!!g!391749164546!&gclid=CjwKCAiAu9vwBRAEEiwAzvjq-zrEd9pZ-QRkhK-Tpfd6UJFYhRnC8sQOzas0oXPQXq3zr44tGo3_MhoC_XcQAvD_BwE&gclsrc=aw.ds
    • By BabyPepper
      160mm x 1600mm + Lunt LS50C etalon.
      Thanks for looking!
            <br>    

       
    • By vineyard
      Hello,
      I recently bought a 2nd hand Lunt 50PT Ha (on a different platform).  The vendor said he had only used it a handful of times since buying it and it shipped in the original box.  It seems fine, focuses well (although I find the helical focuser a bit of a pain compared to crayfords).  But it doesn't show any Ha features on the surface of the Sun!
      Long story short, I completely opened up the pressure tuner and found a bizarre thing.  Its well greased, there's no detritus (and it doesn't lose pressure).  But there was only one O-ring in it?!  The tuner itself has grooves for two o-rings and the video on Lunt's website (on how to replace o-rings) shows a tuner with two o-rings when it comes out.  And they ship replacements in batches of two.
      So I'm guessing that somehow the original scope shipped with only one o-ring fitted? (It wouldn't make sense for the vendor to have removed one?).
      I'm hoping that's what it is, b/c then the inability to resolve Ha features may just be insufficient pressure building up?  In which case, does anyone know where I can get these replacement o-rings please (Lunt's US website has them but that's only for shipping to the US)?
      If it's not that, and the scope is only meant to have one o-ring, any ideas on the problem?  The ring & tuner seem well greased.
      Thank you!
      Vin
      (EDIT: in the meantime, the next time the sun comes out, I'm going to try moving the current o-ring from the higher groove to the lower groove in case that longer distance from the base is why the pressure isn't building up sufficiently?)
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.