Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Messier 51 The Whirpool Galaxy


Laurin Dave

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Dave Lloyd said:

That's a gorgeous, almost ethereal image but how do you sleep whilst listening for rain. 

Thanks Dave....  I only do it when there's no rain anywhere near ..  I have a Pulsar dome..  just need to get round to putting on the automated shutter and rain/cloud sensor.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Excellent work Dave, the processing is spot on. Love the quirky framing too, bringing in IC 4263.

I did a bit of research into IC 4278 (the faint fuzzy below the gap between M51a & M51b) several years ago, trying to find out how much further away it is compared to M51. It turns out to be 10 times further at 230 million light years. I calculated this from its redshift value of 0.01672. Anyone who has ever read the phone book (!) will know that 01672 is the Marlborough dialling code, so I named IC 4278 ‘The Marlborough Galaxy’. A weird coincidence given that I live in Marlborough!

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 23/01/2020 at 09:57, PhotoGav said:

Excellent work Dave, the processing is spot on. Love the quirky framing too, bringing in IC 4263.

I did a bit of research into IC 4278 (the faint fuzzy below the gap between M51a & M51b) several years ago, trying to find out how much further away it is compared to M51. It turns out to be 10 times further at 230 million light years. I calculated this from its redshift value of 0.01672. Anyone who has ever read the phone book (!) will know that 01672 is the Marlborough dialling code, so I named IC 4278 ‘The Marlborough Galaxy’. A weird coincidence given that I live in Marlborough!

Thanks Gav.. and glad I included it...   Do you know of any galaxies with red shifts of 0.01189 :) 

Edited by Laurin Dave
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

OMG Dave, just the 42 hours..!! - that's about 3 times more data than I've ever done on a single target, but boy it was worth it; what a stunning image. Revisiting M51 is on my potential list for this year, but I'd be pleased to get 12-15 hours on it, though increasingly I'm seeing the value of 'more is actually better than less'..... Cheers, Geof

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, geoflewis said:

OMG Dave, just the 42 hours..!! - that's about 3 times more data than I've ever done on a single target, but boy it was worth it; what a stunning image. Revisiting M51 is on my potential list for this year, but I'd be pleased to get 12-15 hours on it, though increasingly I'm seeing the value of 'more is actually better than less'..... Cheers, Geof

Thanks Geoff..  it certainly helps having a dual rig..  Over the recent clear spell I added 12.5 hrs LRGB through the150  to last years data doubling the Lum and trebling the RGB whilst at the same time the 100 was just taking Ha.  I'm particularly pleased with how the Ha has contributed and how much better the colour is than last years effort.   Next on the list to add to are M81/M82 and M106.

Dave

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DaveS said:

Wow Dave, that is just plain stunning, 42 hours really paid off. Not having a dual rig something like that would be out of the question for me, but I can dream...

Thanks Dave..  you don't need to as you have a big reflector coming and darker skies than me, also pretty much the same camera (16200 chip) so with any luck you shouldn't need as long to get the same kind of result..  

Dave

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, MartinB said:

Beautiful Dave, well worth the rain risk!  Perfect in every way.  I too think my kit is too expesnive no to have working when there is a clear night!  

Thank you Martin..  I do consult all weather forecasts, the rain radar and check with my Doctor before doing so!   I have all the stuff to automate the shutter and install cloud/rain sensor now and have a target of mid Feb to get it in place - when @PhotoGav is coming over for a viewing..  

Also I've been fiddling with the data again, I stacked it in  APP this time using the "Quality"  weighting which has tightened things up I think.  anyway here's a rework of the image.... I've also posted the full frame....  so many galaxies!  I annotated them in Pixinsight but it only got 20% so looking for a better tool for this.

Dave

M51_L_HaRGB_crop_Final_25Jan20.thumb.jpg.efab71bf83c69ba231cdbd27cb1b64bb.jpg

M51_L_HaRGB_Final_25Jan20.thumb.jpg.320c59d4b91a89ed5638083d99eb3cf0.jpg

 

Edited by Laurin Dave
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I look forward to the site inspection and hope to be able to issue you with a Pass Certificate!

The reprocess is looking great. It’s very interesting to see the full field of view and how much you are able to crop in to it with the detail remaining so sharp.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PhotoGav said:

I look forward to the site inspection and hope to be able to issue you with a Pass Certificate!

The reprocess is looking great. It’s very interesting to see the full field of view and how much you are able to crop in to it with the detail remaining so sharp.

Better get my skates on then Gav..   and thanks,  6" refractors are a great tool, just wish it was a bit quicker!

6 minutes ago, geoflewis said:

Excellent revision and I love the full frame.

Thank you Geof, much appreciated...  

Dave

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.