Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

CKemu

WOW It's been some time...Went Classic, went for M42

Recommended Posts

850069060_M42RGB4P.thumb.jpg.95d96df3388fe7ccaaf82f35908a646f.jpg

 

It has been six months since I last used the telescope! Urghh that sentence is heart wrenching, but between the awful wet weather, running a bar (this time of year, it's only open evenings) and moving house - I simply haven't had chance.

It was hard enough remembering how to configure the telescope, and my guiding was "SLOPPY", 0.8"-1.2" for long periods, and then periods of 2"-3", so those stars aren't perfect - but honestly the sheer joy of getting back out there and imaging overrides the usual stress about perfection, and went with whatever came my way.

My new location is more "in town", it's not bad, but it's not as good as the empty beach I used to image from, that and my Southern window is smaller, so I expect to image more "Northern" objects over the next year or so.

Anyhow this is my first serious crack at M42, it was one of the first things I ever looked at, and had a bash at imaging, but despite it being the ever popular winter target, I've never really bothered with it in the time since,.

This image is made from four panels, imaged over three nights. Each panel being 12 x 300 s in R, G, B with no flats/bias or other faff, just straight up, 12 hours of data, stacked in DSS, and combined/stitched in Photoshop, and tonight might be clear to, so going to slew left and capture in that direction.

I left the core blown out, I did shoot short exposures for the trapezium, but I confess, I like it blown out, it gives it a proper sense of brightness to me.

Thank you for looking, if it happens to be clear tonight, I shall post my results from that in this thread.

  • Like 10

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very nice, glad you are back in business.  I too like to see a sense of the dynamic range at the centre of M42 and am not a fan of images which show the trapezium stars but are very flat

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1702961651_M42RGB6P.thumb.jpg.373a4193ba907ab7dbdd17396d9e7991.jpg

Six hours later and I managed to grab two more panels to give me the running man, this is by far the largest image I have produced (in terms of x*y dimensions). Perhaps to balance the image a bit better, I should do a run that fills out the space at the top. Though that may be a decade from now with how the weather goes.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very nice. I like the natural colours.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. Very nice indeed. And as others have said, very natural colours. 

I've never done a panel. How do you make sure you can't see the join? 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Ouroboros said:

Yes. Very nice indeed. And as others have said, very natural colours. 

I've never done a panel. How do you make sure you can't see the join? 

I use a couple of tricks:

1) I have about a 25-30% overlap, to ensure that Photoshop's photomerge or Microsofts' Image Composite Editor (ICE) can stitch.
2) If using PS, I make sure it's set to "reposition", so it doesn't distort the image in any way, and blending is set to on.
3) Each panel I "calibrate", so if P1 is my reference, then when I stack P2, I check that the same points between images (normally background space near a recognizable star formation) have the same grey value, so if P1 reads 44,44,44 then the same region in the overlap on P2 should also read 44,44,44 - or very close, if not, I go back to DSS, darken/brighten accordingly and resave the image.

I also recommend if you are doing a colour image, build your colour composites after the above process, and then stitch the colour raw images together, this helps with overall alignment.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@CKemu OK. THanks for that description. So it's not a completely automatic process, which I imagined it might be. It sounds like a degree of judgement and tweaking is required. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

M42RGB6P__fs.thumb.jpg.5b0a214df1977d588830c932e4807ef1.jpg

 

Rather than making a new thread, I thought I'd drop this here with the original images. Ended up playing with Star Net++ and Photoshop to remove all the stars from the image. I love the fact that your focus is now solely drawn to the nebula. Why I have only just heard of Star Net now is beyond me. But glad I have.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Vicky050373
      The Orion constellation taken 14.01.16 using Canon 100D on Skywatcher Star Adventurer. A reworking of my original image using Gimp. Bringing out the detail and colours of the nebula has unfortunately also brightened the LP to the lower half of the image. You can clearly see M42 The Orion Nebula within "the sword", and there is The Flame Nebula and The Horsehead Nebula around the bottom left star of "the belt". You can also see an element of Barnard's Loop which is the red band that curves around the left hand side of the image.
    • By Vicky050373
      Taken using Canon 100D on SkyWatcher Star Adventurer - 300mm lens, 30 second exposure at ISO 1600
      Lightly processed in PS Elements 11
    • By Leveye
      Bit of a redo from an earlier post. Opinions and suggestions most welcome.

    • By Gonzo
      As it's a very clear night, I thought I would do a very quick test.
      Camera: GF1
      Lens: Hoya 200mm 1:3.5
      exposure: 4"
      I took a single shot, hand held camera for 4". Wanted to know if I could capture a faint glimpse of M42 and I got it.
      Really can't wait now until I use my proper imaging rig. I still have to learn a lot about imaging, but I'll get there slowly

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.