Rodd Posted December 29, 2019 Share Posted December 29, 2019 (edited) Not sure why but this image has given me more trouble than most. There is a balance between brightness and subtlety in the star field saturation and brightness that has eluded me through countless versions. I processed for days before I realized my screen brightness was set at 100%--not good! I then realized I had forgotten to insert the Lum! I think I have reached a point where I can be content. I prefer RGB nebula, but the starfield was too dark without the lum. As such, the nebulae in this image are mostly RGB, while the starfield and surrounding clouds are LRGB. I think the image looks best hardly stretched right after channel combination. Then again, that is usually the case with all my images. I guess it boils down to a minimalist approach to processing. The best data needs a light hand. Me Hulk! Smash! FSq 106 with .6x reducer L 218 30 sec, R: 110; G: 151; B: 109 (all 30 sec) Edited December 29, 2019 by Rodd 14 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael.h.f.wilkinson Posted December 29, 2019 Share Posted December 29, 2019 Whatever the difficulties, the result is a lovely image! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rodd Posted December 29, 2019 Author Share Posted December 29, 2019 8 minutes ago, michael.h.f.wilkinson said: Whatever the difficulties, the result is a lovely image! Thanks Mike! Rodd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rodd Posted December 29, 2019 Author Share Posted December 29, 2019 Her's a little darker in the star field. and I tweaked the green a bit seemed it was a bit greenish--hard to tell though 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now