Jump to content

SkySurveyBanner.jpg.21855908fce40597655603b6c9af720d.jpg

M8 and M20


Rodd

Recommended Posts

Not sure why but this image has given me more trouble than most.  There is a balance between brightness and subtlety in the star field saturation and brightness that has eluded me through countless versions.  I processed for days before I realized my screen brightness was set at 100%--not good!  I then realized I had forgotten to insert the Lum!  I think I have reached a point where I can be content.   I prefer RGB nebula, but the starfield was too dark without the lum.  As such, the nebulae in this image are mostly RGB, while the starfield and surrounding clouds are LRGB.   I think the image looks best hardly stretched right after channel combination.   Then again, that is usually the case with all my images.  I guess it boils down to a minimalist approach to processing.  The best data needs a light hand.  Me Hulk! Smash!

FSq 106 with .6x reducer  L 218  30 sec, R: 110; G: 151; B: 109 (all 30 sec)

 

 

 

 

LRGB-5.thumb.jpg.584a90ecdbc7116ad65eb68ace7e3c0d.jpg

Edited by Rodd
  • Like 14
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.