Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_beauty_night_skies.thumb.jpg.2711ade15e31d01524e7dc52d15c4217.jpg

Recommended Posts

Hello, 

i am having so many difficulties as far as i remember to make some nice flats to match my images.For some reason it it impossible for me to find the secret spot in time and adu for my Flats.

This is my equipment :

Telescope: Redcat 51

Camera: Atik 383l+ mono (i know the shutter problem that's why i always aim for 3sec and above for taking my flats)

Filter Wheel: Atik EFW2 (36mm)

Filters: Astrodon Ha & Oiii 36mm 3nm

FlatBox: Geoptic flat field generator 164mm (dimmable)

Image aquire software: APT Tool v3.71

Software: Astro Pixel Processor

 

This is what i get...i am uploading some images converted in jpeg for the site...

Photo A is a MASTER FLAT Ha (Bin 1x1) created with 30 Darks, 50 FLats (3.7sec adu 22000), 50 Dark Flats, 100 Bias 

Photo B is a MASTER FLAT Oiii (Bin 2x2) created with 30 Darks, 50 FLats (5sec adu 46000), 50 Dark FLats, 100 Bias

Photo C is an example result of stacking my fits of Helix Nebula at Bin 2x2 , with the above calibration master frames (this is the Oiii in this case)

 

Are my calibration frames Over correcting ? if yes what can i do ?

Is the Optical path problematic ? as i can see at photo A ? what can i do , what to check ?

I have checked also the filter wheel position related to filter change , but it comes centered...i couldn't see a fault on it.

i Believe i have a problem also finding the correct ADU value....i made any experiments by changing the adu value and i have tried at 22000, 32000, 47000 by using the CCD Flats Aid.......but nothing all come out the same.

I hope someone can help cause i am loosing my mind and my fits 😥

A_MF-ISO_gain_-1.0-exp_3.70313s-50subs-ATIK_383L_Mono-3362x2537-SC_1_3.0-noBl-avg-St.jpg

B MF-ISO_gain_-1.0-exp_5.0s-50subs-ATIK_383L_Mono-1681x1268-SC_1_3.0-noBl-avg-St.jpg

C St-med-30600.0s-SC_2_3.0_none-x_1.0_LZ3-NS-full-eq-add-sc_BWMV_nor-AAD-RL-MBB5_8thLNC_it2-St.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Its they are over correcting, it looks like an issue with settings in APP to me. 

I suggest that you go through APP setting on calibration line by line and see if you can find something out of place. 

Are your flats being correctly calibrated with bias?

Edited by Adam J

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Adam thank you for your reply , 

Yes my Flats are corrected with Bias in the procedure of creating Master Flats (if that's what you mean) , also i have discovered now by experimenting that 16bit master calibration frames work better than 32bit , i don't know if that should be correct or not....

If they are over correcting , does that mean that i should use less calibration frames to create my Masters ? although someone told me the more the better......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 03/10/2019 at 16:46, Nikolas74 said:

Adam thank you for your reply , 

Yes my Flats are corrected with Bias in the procedure of creating Master Flats (if that's what you mean) , also i have discovered now by experimenting that 16bit master calibration frames work better than 32bit , i don't know if that should be correct or not....

If they are over correcting , does that mean that i should use less calibration frames to create my Masters ? although someone told me the more the better......

Only just seen this. It's not the number of frames it's something wrong with the exposure and or your calibration process. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you sort this out?  Wonder if this was caused by internal reflections.. Had something similar and sorted it out with some flocking 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Adam J said:

Only just seen this. It's not the number of frames it's something wrong with the exposure and or your calibration process. 

I think too....till today I am still fighting to find what is going on....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Laurin Dave said:

Did you sort this out?  Wonder if this was caused by internal reflections.. Had something similar and sorted it out with some flocking 

Really don't know.....I have to experiment more....what I know is that I never had these issues before.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You say,

 

Photo A is a MASTER FLAT Ha (Bin 1x1) created with 30 Darks, 50 FLats (3.7sec adu 22000), 50 Dark Flats, 100 Bias 

Photo B is a MASTER FLAT Oiii (Bin 2x2) created with 30 Darks, 50 FLats (5sec adu 46000), 50 Dark FLats, 100 Bias

but if I'm reading your post correctly this is not at all the right way to make flats. 1) There is no need for '30 darks.' These darks are there to calibrate your images, not your flats. 2) You can calibrate CCD flats by either subtracting bias or by subtracting proper dark flats but certainly not both, because they are almost identical and will double-subtract if you do this.

I never make my flats in the same pre-processing pass as used to stack and calibrate my images. I want to have a look at any master flat I use before applying it. So I load up all my individual flats as if they were images and load up a master bias to use as a dark flat. I then average-combine my flats and look at the result. If you want to go by the book you can make dedicated darks for flats (AKA Flat darks) but with CCD cameras I really wouldn't bother. A master bias will give the same result as a master dark flat.

Olly

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Olly thank you for your answer  , what i do is to load everything in APP and start the whole procedure from scratch , this is how i end up with the masters.....i use a different approach when doing it at Pixinsight.

So what i am posting as an example is the result from APP...but the same happens with other software.

Maybe its too much to use DARKS and DARK FLATS...i don't know i have lost it totally , my brain is spinning now 😀

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 22/10/2019 at 14:15, ollypenrice said:

You say,

 

Photo A is a MASTER FLAT Ha (Bin 1x1) created with 30 Darks, 50 FLats (3.7sec adu 22000), 50 Dark Flats, 100 Bias 

Photo B is a MASTER FLAT Oiii (Bin 2x2) created with 30 Darks, 50 FLats (5sec adu 46000), 50 Dark FLats, 100 Bias

but if I'm reading your post correctly this is not at all the right way to make flats. 1) There is no need for '30 darks.' These darks are there to calibrate your images, not your flats. 2) You can calibrate CCD flats by either subtracting bias or by subtracting proper dark flats but certainly not both, because they are almost identical and will double-subtract if you do this.

I never make my flats in the same pre-processing pass as used to stack and calibrate my images. I want to have a look at any master flat I use before applying it. So I load up all my individual flats as if they were images and load up a master bias to use as a dark flat. I then average-combine my flats and look at the result. If you want to go by the book you can make dedicated darks for flats (AKA Flat darks) but with CCD cameras I really wouldn't bother. A master bias will give the same result as a master dark flat.

Olly

Yes Dark flats are for use in place of Bias for flat calibration on CMOS cameras not for CCD chips. In that case you only use Bias.  

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it normal that the shadows from the light path don't look round and instead they have this weird shape ? Shouldn't it be round ? I was thinking that maybe the flat panel was not centered because it's a bit bigger than the Redcat lens diameter....but I try to center it the best way I could.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Nikolas74 said:

Is it normal that the shadows from the light path don't look round and instead they have this weird shape ? Shouldn't it be round ? I was thinking that maybe the flat panel was not centered because it's a bit bigger than the Redcat lens diameter....but I try to center it the best way I could.

I know your camera has a shutter and that flats need to be sufficiently long so as to minimize the effect of the shutter opening and closing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes , my Flats are taken over to 3 seconds...the Ha was 3.70 if I remember....sorry but my English is not as good as yours and generally I hope i can make my questions clear as possible.....the shadow/light pattern between the Ha flat and Oiii flat is so different ....is it normal ?it's not concentric....another strange thing is that , this Ha master flat is doing a better job than the Oiii master flat when used accordingly to the light frames....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is from yesterday , a stacking of 8x1200sec Oiii filter( no claibration frames).....I believe this a reflection of something but its round so it must be from the filter.....so tonight i will swap sides to see what happens...

REFLECTION.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks too large to me to be from a filter and wonder if it’s a reflection from a surface or one of the elements within the Redcat.. suggest you use the dust donut calculator to work out how far away it is (just google dust donut calculator, I’d estimate at least 80mm from the sensor) also take the camera off and look through the scope at a bright light and see if there are any shiny surfaces that need blackening..  or whether it needs to be returned..   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's what I am afraid of.....an element misplacement in the Redcat....but then again I don't see to have a star problem.....in the Ha filter this pattern don't show....tonight I will check with the filter flipped side.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your stars look good so hopefully nothing to do with the glass..  remember though that surfaces do not necessarily reflect all wavelengths the same so the issue could easily be different on different filters

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Goodmorning , ok this is a stack of 6x1200sec Oiii filter( no claibration frames).........strange how the pattern/gradient changed....

Oiii filter is flipped side now.....

Light Pollution is more visible on the right....

What you make out of it ??????

REFLECTION 2.jpg

Edited by Nikolas74
correction

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Lead_weight
      My M31. Shot over 3 nights. Only 11 total hours. LRGB only with Astrodon filters, ZWO ASI1600MM-C camera, and the WO Redcat.

    • By Lead_weight
      I shot this over 6 nights. We had an amazing go of clear nights in a row. Now it's all rain until next week. But while it was clear, I managed two nights per filter on my newest scope. A total of ~ 760 3 min images. I think the total imaging time was 37.8 hours. Shot it through my newest scope the RedCat 51mm. It did well, but could have used a belt focuser. I managed to get one together from Moonlite, but only just after imaging this. The scope was able to hold focus a good bit of the night, but the quality curve looked like a swan dive towards the end as the scope lost focus at the end of the night each night. I got out my old trusty AVX to manage the aiming parts of the setup. Guided by an old Orion SSAG I had lying around and a recently acquired ZWO Mini guide scope since it matches the RedCat so well. But I think I'm going to need to swap out the guide cam for something with smaller pixels. Overall though, it worked.  Main camera was ZWO ASI 1600 MMC. I used 5nm Astrodon filters.


    • By ACross
      Hi All, I am posting what I suspect is a newbie mistake question but hoping that someone can assist with the issue of flats.
      Although I have been fumbling around the sky, taking snaps at leisure, recently I became serious.  I have read up about the different calibration files (flats, darks, bias) and they seemed to make sense; different ways to capture the image defects and extract those from the image of the sky. After a few weeks (months) of further fumbling I went back to the very first target to receive my attention, M42 Orion Nebula.
      In short, I took 20x 30s exposures in LRGB  and ran these along with 20x LRGB each of darks, bias and flats. To obtain the flats I used a diffuse sheet of perspex (lightbox material) and an LED video lamp that has 180 white LEDs, turned to its lowest setting. Attached below is the stacked Luminance flat and the light image. In the lights I am getting very strong marks from dust and I had thought that the flats would subtract this but looking at the flats the marks are completely different shapes and do nothing to remove them from the lights.
      The attached has been further stretched to show the issue. Now, I am obviously doing something wrong but I have no idea what, any pointers from the vast pool of knowledge will be much appreciated.
      Thanks, Anthony
       


    • By EyeGuy
      So after Carole helped me to realise that I was taking my flats wrong, I've reprocessed this image and finally the funny rings have vanished.
      Original thread
      TL;DR - I was underexposing my flats, which resulted in failure of calibration to remove vignetting, as well as it introducing weird red concentric oval rings.
      Last night was supposed to be clear, so I set up in the garden. Cue the Irish weather. I only managed to get PA and focus (you know, the most fun bits) and then the clouds rolled in.
      Anyway, so instead of imaging, I took a bunch of calibration frames. The setup was slightly different to the lights -
      1) temp 4 C instead of -1.5 C (no big deal)
      2) camera at different angle to telescope (can't correct dust motes)
      3) new camera angle adjuster in path (different vignetting and internal reflections)
      so I didn't hold out much hope that it would correct the problem. But it did! I used the new bias and darks to correct the new flats, and then the old bias and old darks and new flats to correct the lights. I'm so pleased I've finally figured out what was going on as it's ruined many images for me over the past year+.
      Thanks again Carole,
      Barry
       

    • By philherbert
      Hi All,
      I have recently converted from an old Canon DSLR to a ZWO ASI1600MC-Pro. The individual subs look great with the new camera, but I am having seemingly insoluble problems processing, so I need the assembled wisdom here! The first image shows a single sub on the left (auto-stretched), and the result of stacking some 25 subs on the right, combined with flats. The flats have corrected quite nicely for the dust doughnuts, but given me inverted vignetting. (I should say that I have tried processing with darks and bias as well, but the basic problem of the reversed vignetting remains. Processing was done in Deep Sky Stacker, although I get the same results using PI and the BPP script).

      I initially thought this was down to using the wrong ADU values for the flats, so I've tried various from 5,000 up to 30,000 in 5,000 increments, but nothing improves - the higher the ADU the worse the effect seems to get. I've also tried different techniques for taking the flats - grey skies (easy at the moment) with t-shirt layers in front, or a tablet screen on white. Flats are seemingly ok - here is an individual sub on the left and master flat on the right. OK, they are rather brownish, but apart from that they look ok to my (DSLR-attuned) eye. Different ADU values seem to fail to correct for the dust doughnuts, as well as making the vignetting worse.

      I have one further thought / problem to add. The over-corrected centre of that processed image (top, right-hand side) shows some odd details. Here's a zoomed version. There are fairly broad swirly lines showing up in there. Actually the lines are across the whole image, but most visible in the centre where the vignetting shows it up.
      My only thoughts are that this could be condensation or similar? Might this account for the flats not correcting properly? As I said I'm using the ASI1600MC-Pro, and have it set to cool to -20C for all lights, darks and flats. I've not encountered a problem like this with flats failing to work so miserably, so I'm after any and all knowledge at this point.
      To a fair extent I can take out the vignetting with ABE/DBE, but that then leaves me the dust doughnuts. I really don't want to have to 'edit' my pictures to that extent, and feel that the flats should take care of the vignetting.
      Thanks for looking.
      Phil
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.