Nigella Bryant Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 (edited) A surprise, an EQ8 R PrevNext Skywatcher EQ8-R Pro (head only) £3,699.00 Replacing the redoubtable Skywatcher EQ8, is this new improved version - the EQ8-R. Improvements include shifting the motor housings to improve axial balance in certain orientations, improved internal cable management, improved connectivity (with 3x built-in USB connectors and 3x power out sockets to run peripherals, such as cameras), up-rated clutch mechanism, improved dovetail groove knob for added comfort and increased locking power and belt drive of the Dec Axis for reduced slewing noise. The mount is available as this head-only option for those with observatory piers and also as a version with the portable pier tripod, for those who need to transport their system. Edited September 17, 2019 by Nigella Bryant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeremyS Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 (edited) >>**Please note Freedom-Find encoders are not present on the EQ8-R** That's a pity! Just noticed there is another thread on this new mount here: Edited September 17, 2019 by JeremyS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michaelmorris Posted September 21, 2019 Share Posted September 21, 2019 Looks great, but that is quite a price difference from the old EQ8. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nigella Bryant Posted September 22, 2019 Author Share Posted September 22, 2019 13 hours ago, michaelmorris said: Looks great, but that is quite a price difference from the old EQ8. That's my thought exactly, seems a bit of a con. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michaelmorris Posted September 22, 2019 Share Posted September 22, 2019 8 hours ago, Nigella Bryant said: That's my thought exactly, seems a bit of a con. I wouldn't go that far. The old EQ8 was the more or less on it's own at the circa £2000 price point in having such a high weight capacity. My guess is that they've decided to aim the mount a higher spec market, hence the belt driven Dec axis and all the built in power and USB features. Perhaps there just isn't a big enough market for a high capacity mount at this price point to make it worth making them. However, personally I think it's a shame that this option of a (relatively) inexpensive high capacity mount will now have disappeared. Perhaps there is a new low cost, high weight capacity mount in the pipeline (EQ7)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WanderingEye Posted September 22, 2019 Share Posted September 22, 2019 8 hours ago, Nigella Bryant said: That's my thought exactly, seems a bit of a con. Apparently the older EQ8 mounts were heavily discounted on price, hence the newer ones gone up, that’s what FLO have reported anyway... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamesF Posted September 22, 2019 Share Posted September 22, 2019 17 minutes ago, michaelmorris said: Perhaps there is a new low cost, high weight capacity mount in the pipeline (EQ7)? There was talk of an EQ7 before the EQ8 came out if I recall correctly. In fact Skywatcher may even have demoed one at one point. I think the lack of a mount at the EQ8 price point shoves me very firmly into the used market for any future upgrade (or even build one myself). James Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zakalwe Posted September 23, 2019 Share Posted September 23, 2019 This looks interesting: https://www.skywatcher.it/sky-watcher-eq8-rh/ (I used Google Translate). " Same identical technical features as the EQ8-R, same load capacity, same design, same weight and same functionality. However, the substantial difference lies in the presence of a Renishaw encoder on the right ascension axis " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyson M Posted October 19, 2019 Share Posted October 19, 2019 New video on the EQ8-R! Looks like a great mount. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xplode Posted October 19, 2019 Share Posted October 19, 2019 I wonder if they fixed the EQ8's actual biggest problem which is the tolerances of the machining, i've had 3 EQ8's an all had unacceptable backlash 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyson M Posted October 19, 2019 Share Posted October 19, 2019 ^ my observing buddy said the same thing for his EQ8. He does long exposure imaging and ended up selling it for a 10 micron Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xplode Posted October 19, 2019 Share Posted October 19, 2019 5 hours ago, Tyson M said: ^ my observing buddy said the same thing for his EQ8. He does long exposure imaging and ended up selling it for a 10 micron I did the exact same thing, had a 10 Micron since 2015 and now it's at a co'owned remote observatory in Spain imaging 200+ nights per year since summer 2017 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyson M Posted October 19, 2019 Share Posted October 19, 2019 Wise choice! My friend absolutely loves his. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miguel1983 Posted May 1, 2020 Share Posted May 1, 2020 Any EQ8 -R and Rh users who want to share there thoughts ? Not a lot of hands on reviews yet... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ollypenrice Posted May 1, 2020 Share Posted May 1, 2020 I discovered just now via a PM that there is an EQ8 forum with a member called Olly. This led to a little confusion till the sender and I realized that this is another Olly and not me! I did have 'history' with the early EQ8 but, since then, it has been revised and is getting a good press. If ever my visual-only 14 inch LX200 packs up (which is not unknown) a new EQ8 would be top of my list as a replacement. It's very affordable for a big mount. Olly (the old one! 🤣 ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magnum Posted May 1, 2020 Share Posted May 1, 2020 6 minutes ago, ollypenrice said: I discovered just now via a PM that there is an EQ8 forum with a member called Olly. This led to a little confusion till the sender and I realized that this is another Olly and not me! I did have 'history' with the early EQ8 but, since then, it has been revised and is getting a good press. If ever my visual-only 14 inch LX200 packs up (which is not unknown) a new EQ8 would be top of my list as a replacement. It's very affordable for a big mount. Olly (the old one! 🤣 ) Sorry for confusing you Olly, as you are a one off anyway 😛 Lee 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jambouk Posted October 5, 2020 Share Posted October 5, 2020 I've had my EQ8-R Pro for about a month and used it three times. It isn't permenantnly set up, though it really needs to be! I made a 15 minute video for my local society's online meetings on some of the very basic aspects of setting up the mount and talking about its features, but this is VERY simple, so don't expect any guiding graphs or backlash measurements. Feel free to watch. I made two videos, one short and one longer, this is the longer version:https://www.dropbox.com/s/td4k0sae5a0aorn/EQ8 long version.mp4?dl=0 A few considerations so far: - I've not guided with it yet so can't comment on that - it is VERY heavy - there is no noticeable backlash in either axis - it is remarkably stable - the autohome position is nice and so far when undertaking a star alignment the first star has always been near the centre of the FoV of the finderscope which is something I've never encountered with my AZ-EQ6 - it handles the C14 with absolute ease, which it should, but is refreshing - the GOTO accuracy appears to be amazing even when using a C14 - after polar aligning with PoleMaster the tracking has been excellent - I'm still trying to get to grips with the internal USB hub; I'm waiting for some shorter USB3 cables, but at present I need a powered USB hub between the laptop and the input USB port on the mount to get it to drive a non-cooled ZWO camera the other end, even when powering the auxillary part of the mount. - I'm not 100% taken with the clutch levers yet, but I guess I'll get used to them. They just feel a bit flimsy. - Had the Rh version been £1000 less than its current price, I proibably would have gone all out for that version. It is truely lovely. James 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeremyS Posted October 5, 2020 Share Posted October 5, 2020 Good luck with the new mount James @jambouk! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jambouk Posted October 10, 2020 Share Posted October 10, 2020 Clearly the nuts and bolts on the pier-tripod are just mild steel... Maybe whoever decides on the specs of Skywatcher mounts has never heard of moisture... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now