Jump to content

SkySurveyBanner.jpg.21855908fce40597655603b6c9af720d.jpg

Dob 200P 2” eyepiece adapter


Recommended Posts

I am using 40mm with mine. All 2" eyepieces I tried come to focus with it (Aero ED 35mm, Meade QX 26mm, ES82 30mm, SkyWatcher SWA70 32mm). I also use it with 1.25" to 2" adapter which is about 10mm tall and all my 1.25" eyepieces come to focus. I also know that 50mm was too much for SkyWatcher SWA70 32mm, I didn't try with others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, pregulla said:

I am using 40mm with mine. All 2" eyepieces I tried come to focus with it (Aero ED 35mm, Meade QX 26mm, ES82 30mm, SkyWatcher SWA70 32mm). I also use it with 1.25" to 2" adapter which is about 10mm tall and all my 1.25" eyepieces come to focus. I also know that 50mm was too much for SkyWatcher SWA70 32mm, I didn't try with others.

Thank you very much for the info, I will order the 40mm adapter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Star Struck said:

I have one 2" eyepiece in my 200P dob that needs a 50mm, but all the rest are happy with 35mm.

That has made things more uncertain. Has anyone here got the original adapter supplied with the telescope ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, bingevader said:

Check your drawtube has a screw thread then, as that adaptor screws straight into it.

I doubt I'd reach focus if I only pulled my EPs out by 12mm and fastened them there!

I checked the drawtube and it does not have a thread.  I have located a 40mm extension adapter which I will order and see how it goes.

Many thanks to all who replied with all your helpful suggestions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Banj

First of all welcome from Land Down under

I have SW 250 flex Dob scope

Will check mine tonight, as doing viewing of Harvest Moon tonight, with local television station

I also have 2" barlow, and had never been able to get Dob to focus using it, need extension tube

Not sure what the advantage is using 2" eyepieces, as opposed to 1.25"

John

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/09/2019 at 21:05, cletrac1922 said:

Not sure what the advantage is using 2" eyepieces, as opposed to 1.25"

As @bingevader says, much wider true field of view (TFOV).  You can only take in a 27mm diameter view of the image plane with a 1.25" eyepiece, but a 46mm diameter view with a 2" eyepiece.  That's a 46*46/27*27=2.9x more viewable area.  For instance, it makes viewing large objects like the Pleiades and Collinder 70 much easier in moderate focal length telescopes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.