Flats quality

[bottletopburly]

Could someone be as so kind as to  look at my flat frame and tell me if it looks ok created with a led panel .

 

 

Single__0087_ISO800_1-320s__16C.CR2

[PH-R]

I had a look in PS and with my limited knowledge I would say no. The red channel is  0-5% on the histogram, blue about 30% and green 40%. My flats show all channels at about 50%. Hope this helps.

[bottletopburly]

camera is a canon 1000D  ir modified  , manual mode 1-320 s histogram one third over from left ,image snap shot from APT  stretched view 

1 hour ago, PH-R said:

I had a look in PS and with my limited knowledge I would say no. The red channel is  0-5% on the histogram, blue about 30% and green 40%. My flats show all channels at about 50%. Hope this helps.

 

Edited September 8, 2019 by bottletopburly

[michael8554]

Looks just like my modified Canon flats but way underexposed.

If you shoot with the AV setting you automatically get the right exposure.

Michael

[tooth_dr]

Unless this was taken with an Oiii filter, then it looks ok.

[bottletopburly]

5 hours ago, michael8554 said:

Looks just like my modified Canon flats but way underexposed.

If you shoot with the AV setting you automatically get the right exposure.

Michael

Not in av ,camera still attached to scope nothing’s moved , so should be able to redo , can’t remember the reason I didn’t use AV mode but started to question myself whether they are correct. 

Edited September 9, 2019 by bottletopburly

[bottletopburly]

21 hours ago, michael8554 said:

Looks just like my modified Canon flats but way underexposed.

If you shoot with the AV setting you automatically get the right exposure.

Michael

redone flats in AV mode ,my camera still attached to scope nothing has been altered  https://photos.app.goo.gl/ZBaeXmLLsU76renH8  

 

 

[michael8554]

That looks suitable. 

Michael