Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_dslr_mirrorlesss_winners.thumb.jpg.9deb4a8db27e7485a7bb99d98667c94e.jpg

Calzune

Level, polar align, Home position

Recommended Posts

Hi!

I have just bought a heq5 pro and I have some questions...

1. Level. 

I have watched many astronomy videos and almost all of them uses a small level tool to level out all three legs  on the mount. But on many mounts like the heq5 pro there is a built In bubble leveler.. 

Is it better to use a small level tool than the bubble?

 

2.  Polar align.

I have read and watched many polar align videos but I'm still insecure on how I should do it...

The mount has a RA index scale, and a date circle. What I have understood is that those are for enter date and time to find Polaris, right?

But do I have to use those scales if I use a polar finder app that  tells me were to put Polaris in my polar scope? Like the photo below

After this I should do 3 star alignment for more accurate tracking (I only have dslr to align with) right? 

 

3. Home position.

This is needed right? if so, how does it work and how do I do it?

8411E9EB-545F-4A7E-95A8-3FF6CC58ED68.jpeg

Edited by Calzune
Edit

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The bubble levels mounted on tripods tend not to be very accurate, but this doesn't actually matter because you don't need to be super accurate with the levelling anyway. .

Polaris finder apps are definitely better than trying to use the scales on the back of the mount.

The home or starting position for a mount is generally counterweight bar pointing straight down and telescope pointing at the north celestial polar (northern hemisphere). The reason for the home position is that the handset requires a known starting pointing prior to initiating the first star alignment.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Cornelius Varley said:

The bubble levels mounted on tripods tend not to be very accurate, but this doesn't actually matter because you don't need to be super accurate with the levelling anyway. .

Polaris finder apps are definitely better than trying to use the scales on the back of the mount.

The home or starting position for a mount is generally counterweight bar pointing straight down and telescope pointing at the north celestial polar (northern hemisphere). The reason for the home position is that the handset requires a known starting pointing prior to initiating the first star alignment.

Thanks! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Although what Cornelius Varley says is right, if you’re like me you’re Irritated by supposed “instruments” being completely unfit for their one purpose in life.

All the _bubble_ levels I have, including the one in my very expensive Berlebach Planet tripod, are miles out.

Even most of my small rule levels I’ve had to throw out, being up to 0.8 degrees wrong. These things have but one job to do!

So I’ve resorted to paying a little bit up, £30 ish for a 6-8” one is about right, and getting ones that are accurate and survive being dropped. Stabila is good.

It’s not going to make much difference to my observing, alignment software can easily cope and allow for it, but it makes me feel better...

Cheers, Magnus

Edited by Captain Magenta
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Captain Magenta said:

Although what Cornelius Varley says is right, if you’re like me you’re Irritated by supposed “instruments” being completely unfit for their one purpose in life.

All the _bubble_ levels I have, including the one in my very expensive Berlebach Planet tripod, are miles out.

Even most of my small rule levels I’ve had to throw out, being up to 0.8 degrees wrong. These things have but one job to do!

So I’ve resorted to paying a little bit up, £30 ish for a 6-8” one is about right, and getting ones that are accurate and survive being dropped. Stabila is good.

It’s not going to make much difference to my observing, alignment software can easily cope and allow for it, but it makes me feel better...

Cheers, Magnus

There are some very expensive high end eq mounts that don't even have a bubble level. The reason being that whether the tripod is absolutely level or not makes no difference to the correct operation of the mount.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Cornelius Varley said:

There are some very expensive high end eq mounts that don't even have a bubble level. The reason being that whether the tripod is absolutely level or not makes no difference to the correct operation of the mount.

Yes quite.

I do however hanker after a Fell Bubble Level mainly because it’s a thing of beauty and engineering excellence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

New question:

Do I have to adjust the screws on the polar scope to make an object in center of my polar scope before i use it to polar find? In my image below i have paintrd a radiotower, so what im wondering is does the white dot have to be complete still when I rotate the ra axis? Or is this just needed if I use the clock rings on the mount? I hope you understand what i mean.. 

Because yestarday when i finally pilar aligned and had a great focus i tried to photo andromeda galaxy, but after just 20-30 sec i had some star driftig... 

I have no guidescope yet but that shouldt be needed on so short exposers right? 

Screenshot_20190914_095910.jpg

 

 

 

 

Screenshot_20190914_095910.jpg

Screenshot_20190914_095910.jpg

Edited by Calzune
Delete image

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

not messed with the polar scope on my EQ5 as yet, but my understanding is that you need to collimate it to the mount. As in, during daylight aim at a distant static object and centre it, then adjust the retaining screws such that you maintain centre of the object as you rotate the polar scope (not the R/A - on the EQ5 that'd cause the axle to block the polar scope portal). Once the object remains centred the polar scope is collimated to the mount and ready to use for polar alignment, no further adjustment to its adjuster screws. Make sure you've nipped them up so things don't drift, then recheck alignment and redo as needed. You'd have to redo this process if you later remove and reinstall the polar finder tho.

Edited by DaveL59
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Calzune said:

does the white dot have to be complete still when I rotate the ra axis?

Yes. do what @DaveL59says if it isn't.

Ady

Edited by adyj1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Astrofriend
      Hi,
      I was asked on a Swedish forum to put an "Astronomical Dictionary" on my homepage. I have made a test page in an easy form. Astronomical related words linked to wikipedia.
      It aims to the beginners in astronomy so it should not be too complicated words.
      http://astrofriend.eu/astronomy/astronomical-dictionary/astronomical-dictionary.html
      Let me know if it's useful and and I shall add more words.
      /Lars
    • By Waldemar
      I often read that leveling your mount is nonsense or a ‘myth’…

      Although it is not absolutely necessary to level a GEM to achieve good polar alignment, leveling is a very easy and handy way to make the first step into polar alignment, for the simple reason there is a relation between level and latitude. Latitude is always measured as a deviation from level, so why not start with level in the first place? When leveled you can use the marks on the mounts latitude adjustment scale to get a rough alignment together with azimuth adjustment. Yes, without leveling you can get polar alignment as well, but it is a lot harder, because there is nothing to start with…


      Especially when you cannot see Polaris at your favorite site, it is a good idea, to go to a site where you can see Polaris and prepare your mount for ‘blind’ pa, by leveling it as precise as you can, do a polar alignment as good as you can and leave the settings as they are for your next session at the ‘blind’ place. On that place point your mount roughly North with the tripod or azimuth adjuster and level again as precise as you can . Then slew to a star that you can see (preferably South)  about the same latitude as Polaris. You will need to adjust azimuth to get it centered, and maybe a little tweak with latitude (because of ‘flaws’ in your bubble level), but it should be very close if you did a precise leveling... Simple one star polar alignment on a place where you cannot see Polaris!
      For imaging this alignment procedure together with  the use of PHD will be (reasonably) ok as well.

    • By t0ny
      Unlike many I was fortunate enough to get an hour or so of crystal clear skies last night. 
      Up until now I have always roughly plonked my EQ3-2 due North and had fun with some observing. Last night however was my opportunity to try my new  HEQ5 (birthday present) and I thought I would set-up properly for the first time.
      Having been given some great advice on Polar alignment in another topic (I started) I was quite confident this would not be too tricky for me, I was very wrong.
      I spent the first 20 mins looking at the counterweight rod, and again nothing as the dec axis was not rotated to look through. I was just too excited and forgot everything I had read through these cloudy evenings about setting up.

      Anyway I could finally see stars after about 30mins but too many to pick Polaris. I think I was in the general direction but I could not make out which one was him. Should Polaris be really obvious to me, like way brighter? 

      Also it seemed that I had to tip the altitude back almost as high as it could point, does this seem right? I was basically sitting on the cold wet floor squinting up through the polarscope at maybe 10/15 stars with no clue what was what.
      Deflated I resorted to manually moving the scope for 5 mins before the clouds rolled in, the night a failure. 
    • By StevieDvd
      Result from alignment using PhotoPolarAlign by Themos.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.