Jump to content

SkySurveyBanner.jpg.21855908fce40597655603b6c9af720d.jpg

Solar imaging kit


Thalestris24

Recommended Posts

Anyone had experience of the Daystar 60mm kit? https://www.firstlightoptics.com/daystar-solar-h-alpha-telescopes/daystar-solar-scout-ss60-ds-60mm-h-alpha-solar-telescope.html Pros? Cons? It seems quite affordable compared to other options. But can't find many actual imaging examples on Astrobin so wondering if it's actually not that popular for some reason?

Thanks for any advice

Louise

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Merlin66 said:

I think the issue is that it's a fixed 60mm aperture Ha solar scope.

The "Quark" module is built in and not removable (to allow it to be used in other larger telescopes)

 

Yeah, I saw that but was wondering how it performed as a dedicated solar imaging scope in practice.

Thanks

Louise

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Thalestris24 said:

Yeah, I saw that but was wondering how it performed as a dedicated solar imaging scope in practice.

Thanks

Louise

A number of us are wondering the same. Very few reports so far, maybe unsurprising considering the current lack of solar activity.   😀

Link to comment
Share on other sites

New scope and seemingly constant clouds since it’s been released has been the problem. Finaly got mine set up the way I wanted and ready to try some imaging and the SolarQuest mount stopped working. Returned to FLO and turned out to be just a loose plug inside. Due back this aft.

There’s a reason I put that name on the scope. 😁

9215584A-078B-4F0F-8063-174DC788AE82.jpeg

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Peter Drew said:

A number of us are wondering the same. Very few reports so far, maybe unsurprising considering the current lack of solar activity.   😀

I know - why I haven't bothered with white light. But should be able to see proms, as well as chromosphere, with the Daystar 60? At the back of my mind I'm thinking the costs of pretty much all astro equipment could soon skyrocket in these volatile times.. In addition, I reckon I've a better chance of seeing the sun (from Glasgow) than any other stars! No imaging done since mid-May :( I've forgotten how to :(.

Louise 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, johninderby said:

New scope and seemingly constant clouds since it’s been released has been the problem. Finaly got mine set up the way I wanted and ready to try some imaging and the SolarQuest mount stopped working. Returned to FLO and turned out to be just a loose plug inside. Due back this aft.

There’s a reason I put that name on the scope. 😁

 

The label didn't go unnoticed! Hope you get some return on your investment soon!

Louise

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, johninderby said:

The weather has been diabolical since the scope arrived. Cloudy if I’m at home and the sun only comes out when I’m not at home. Hopefully the motorised focuser will help a lot. 🤞🏻

I have several of those dc motor focusers lying around 😄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, johninderby said:

Not hard to motorise the focuser. Tricky bit was working out exacty what pulley and belts were needed. Access to a 3D printer helps as well.

 

Presumably, though, once focussed, only tiny refocussing movements needed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes shouldn’t need much movement to focus. I’ll be using the Hitec V2 DC Focus unit to control it. BTW Hitec is about to release a proper 64 bit driver which will make things easier for those using 64 bit capture software.

Edited by johninderby
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, johninderby said:

Yes shouldn’t need much movement to focus. I’ll be using the Hitec V2 DC Focus unit to control it. BTW Hitec is about to release a proper 64 bit driver which will make things easier for those using 64 bit capture software.

When I was using mine I wrote a bit of software to step control a MotorBee DC driver board via usb. It wasn't Ascom but did the job!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Mk1 human digits are an abomination above 200x when you have 4 meters of focal length grilling on yer laptop!

Those little DC motors are excellent for fine honing yer focus. Sadly the control paddles are unworthy of further mention.

RIP after a couple of hours.  <sniff>

P1380678 rsz 800.JPG

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rusted,

Why belt drive the 1:1 knob and not the 10:1 knob?

The 10:1 gives ever better focus control. I have this set up on all my scopes.....and no issues with the handcontrollers.

My SM60/ED80 sits on an HEQ5 outside, extended cables for the Synscan and focus motor then allow me to image in the cool and dark office.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Merlin66 said:

Rusted,

Why belt drive the 1:1 knob and not the 10:1 knob?

The 10:1 gives ever better focus control. I have this set up on all my scopes.....and no issues with the hand controllers.

My SM60/ED80 sits on an HEQ5 outside, extended cables for the Synscan and focus motor then allow me to image in the cool and dark office.

 

I tried the 10:1 slow-mo knob but even at maximum motor speed on 12V the focuser movement was glacial. Even now it takes 18 seconds per cm of travel flat out.
Sitting in my observatory is necessary because I must constantly correct the AWR/ASCOM Gotos manually. It also avoids OTA collisions with the pier.
Besides, I regular view as well as image. Constantly swapping the camera and EPs. between three OTAs means I have to be present anyway.

One useful thing I discovered is that a timing belt will slip smoothly on the FT focuser knobs given enough effort on the opposite knob.
This is important when I need a rapid four inches of drawtube travel after fitting/removing the Barlow, diagonal, prism, camera or binoviewer.

I'm using a 14T pulley now because the 20T couldn't manage a vertical lift of the 3.5" focuser tube, 2" Lacerta solar prism and camera.
It's all very manual and I really like that. While I could use the spacious ground floor as a warm room it make no real sense for me to do so.

Sitting on the north side of the pier in a 10'/3m diameter dome my body heat probably rises straight up and out of the top of the open observation slit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.