Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Highburymark said:

If I remember accurately, the Pentax zoom was the first 'non-stock' eyepiece I ever bought. I went to the retailer (as we used to do in the olden days - physically walked there - complete madness!) in search of a Baader zoom for standard night viewing, about which I'd heard good things. Anyway, they were out of the Baader, but recommended the Pentax XF, claiming it was even better, and worth the extra few quid. When I tried it out I was disappointed - even on slow scopes it was a step down from the perfectly good plossls I'd been using for years. Then later I got to use it for solar white light and ha, and it's been a faithful companion ever since. Hope you enjoy it as much as I have Adam

Thank you. I am more and more convinced that I have made a good choice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 22/07/2019 at 20:53, johninderby said:

The TS version of the Lunt zoom is on special right now at Telescope Service 

Nice one! I think I'll pull the trigger at that price ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I did not already have my 'cheap & cheerful' zoom, (image below), then I definitely would buy one.

PIC040.JPG.c540c892498ad1b5e850bed6a457d246.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 22/07/2019 at 20:53, johninderby said:

The TS version of the Lunt zoom is on special right now at Telescope Express and a great buy. 

https://www.teleskop-express.de/shop/product_info.php/info/p4651_TS-Optics-Premium-Zoom-Eyepiece--7-2-mm-to-21-5-mm---1-25-.html

Trigger pulled & delivered today :) Thanks again for the heads up.  Been himming and hawing over picking up one of these for yonks.

Cloudy here (what are the odds...) but looking forward to trying it out.  If it works well, it'll be a very convenient addition!  In my Ha scope, the narrow fov shouldn't be a concern.  I'm sure it will be handy for my 130p if camping with the family too.

Edited by niallk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Hi, i just see the hyperflex zoom (60=40 degree) for 69 pounds  At Bristolcameras store. Also the pentax xF zoom for 199 pound.   I was messing around with my seben zoom and it got broken At the bottom. ( some dust get in)  Becource of this , maybe to me the better build quality of the Pentax will make the difference.

Edited by andre2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use a Pentax XW 8- 24mm zoom for Ha observing. Great performance but it's BIG!! and heavy.

Must try it out at night to see if it suffers the same performance issues as the current XF zoom.

 

pentax zoom.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

You now what -maybe I just go for a Celestron clone again at AliExpress for just 52 dollar!! And be a little careful next time. And  dond try to clean the glasses or shake it.  things can get broken fast with zooms!  maybe also a" simple " Zoom glass with just a few coatings is better or at last as good for alpha-H= who knows? 

 

Edited by andre2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Merlin66 said:

I use a Pentax XW 8- 24mm zoom for Ha observing.

Technically, it's a Pentax XL.  The 8-24mm zoom was never updated with the XW release, so it's a 20+ year old design rather than 16+ years for the XWs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

That's a newer Pentax PR XL zoom for which there are no reports whatsoever.  It was introduced a few years ago.  Who wants to go first buying and testing it?

Here's the Pentax SMC XL zoom on FLO, Bristol Cameras, and Agena Astro.  You would also be correct to simply refer to it as the Pentax SMC 8-24mm Zoom as B&H Photo and several others do.  However, I've never seen a single commercial reference to it being labelled the Pentax XW zoom anywhere, and that was simply my point.  As far as I can recall, Pentax has never put the XW appellation on any zoom eyepiece.

Edited by Louis D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Steely Stan
      Hello
      Now I've got my telescope working and I'm regularly shouting at the sky with cloud-rage, I'm starting to think about eyepieces.  My telescope (Celestron Nexstar 8SE) only comes with a single 25mm Plossl, so my thinking was to lay hands on a zoom, say 7-21 or 8-24, and work out what settings I use most and then buy dedicated fixed focal length eyepieces accordingly.
      With that strategy in mind, I've been waiting to get lucky on flea-bay for a Baader mk 3 or even mk 4 zoom but its such a waiting game not knowing if you can win an auction. - looks like about 2 a week come up.  There seem to be three options...
      Get a brand new Baader - £185
      Lurk on eBay till you get lucky - £100 to £125
      Lose patience and  drop a crafty £40 on a SVbony 7-21 and find it good enough to perform my experiment, or perhaps better than the price might indicate.
       
      Anyway, the point of this is to ask, do the better quality, and probably pricier zooms earn their corn becoming "keepers"; or do they inevitably get relegated when one finds one's sweet spot with two or three fixed eyepieces?
      Stan
    • By alex_stars
      Dear Stargazers!
      as a follow up of the discussion on 12mm planetary eyepieces: [settled] 12 mm planetary eyepiece ortho or zoom I though I share with you my experience with my newly acquired EPs which arrived last Monday from Aunty FLO 😉. Just before placing an order, I had a change of mind and went for the 10 mm BCO instead the Q-turret barlow. So here is the list of EPs in this comparison:
      Hyperflex 7E1 Zoom: 7.2 - 21.5 mm (which has already a very good reputation as we all know) Baader Classic Ortho 18 mm Baader Classic Ortho 10 mm Seben Super Plössl Zoom: 8 - 24 mm (same as Skywatcher, Starguider, Zhumell, Agena, ....)
      So here are the contenders. I am well aware that all those have been reviewed and compared, but I though I share my experience with them in the hope that somebody finds it useful.
      The comparison was done with my 180 SkyMax Mak-Cass, set up with the original VB, an Omegon ADC, a TS-1.25" star diagonal and then the EPs. In this configuration, which works really well to correct for atmospheric dispersion, my scope has an effective focal length of 2940 mm. I had the chance to use the EPs two nights in a row, one with ok seeing and yesterday with good seeing conditions. After cooling the scope for about an hour (where I try to place the scope outside for cooling when the outside air temperature is the same as the storing temperature of the Mak, about 24 deg C) I went to work comparing the EPs. Each comparison was done for about an hour, where I switched EPs back an forth, using the orthos as baseline for quality.
      Comparison on Saturn at 10mm, so the BCO 10, the Hyperflex at 10 and the Seben at 10 were compared. That's at 294x magnification:
      The BCO 10 is really sharp (as expected) and to me surprisingly comfortable to use. I was initially sceptical about the 8 mm eye relief, however for me it works and thus gives superb views. 52 deg FOV is also very comfortable. The Cassini Division was clear and easily discernible. The Hyperflex, even though with a smaller FOV, was very close to the performance of the BCO 10. Also expected, I read a lot of good reviews on the Hyperflex. Again Cassini Division nice and clear. The Seben zoom also performed, however noticeably less good than the Hyperflex or even the BCO 10. Basically I missed some sharpness, obviously in comparison with the BCO, but also with the Hyperflex. For my eye it was harder to make out the Cassini Division through the Seben. Comparison on Jupiter at 18 mm: BCO 18, Hyperflex and Seben at 18. That's at 163x magnification. Here a picture of how Jupiter should have looked like to describe what I managed to see:

      Again the BCO 18 gave superb views, sharp with lot's of contrast (as expected for an ortho). Quite some structure visible in the cloud bands.The two main bands where easy to see, no problem there. I was able to see the short dark band below the lower main band, as well as the eddy structure to the right of it (referring to the picture above). I have to say I was impressed. The Hyperflex zoom was quite up there with the BCO, maybe a bit less contrast, but I still could make out the short dark band. With the Seben zoom I had a hard time discerning the short dark band as well as the eddy structure to the side of it. Would I not have known where to look, I would have missed that. So noticeably less contrast in the Seben. Summary comments:
      Using the BCOs as baseline, they both produce very sharp and contrast rich views. The 52 deg FOV is very comfortable to view planets. As said I was surprised how comfortable the BCO 10 is to use even though with its short eye relief (8 mm). Obviously not useful to people who have to wear glasses. The Hyperflex zoom is quite close to the BCOs, even though with a narrower FOV. Sharpness and contrast are comparable. Probably one would not switch too often to the BCOs and happily observe with the Hyperflex. The Seben zoom is a good EP, but not there with the Hyperflex or the BCOs. To my eyes its a workable zoom, but you miss out on details of the planets with respect to sharpness and contrast. I can recommend going for a Hyperflex (as so many have said before) if your are looking for a zoom EP. These three EPs, BCO 10, 18 and the Hyerflex are a very functional base set for a 180 Skymax. BCO 10 very sharp on Saturn (looking forward to see Mars with that). BCO 18 produces contrast rich views of Jupiter. And the Hyperflex for everything between 136x - 408x 😉. Maybe another fixed focal length EP in the 14-15 mm range, just to bridge the gap between the BCO 10 and 18. However the Hyperflex does a great job at that already. A yes, and I really can only recommend an ADC. Without it the cloud band details on Jupiter disappeared even in the BCO 18 and the typical blue/red colour seams were clearly visible. Clear skies,
      Alex
    • By rjc404
      Does anyone who has one of these zoom eyepieces know if there is a t-thread hidden under the twist-up rubber eye-cups like there are on some other zooms?
      I don't have a zoom in my set yet and don't want to break the bank. I just aim to use it mainly for visual e.g. being lazy with one 'no faff' eyepiece or when I'm being more dedicated, scoping out the seeing at different magnifications before changing to a dedicated eyepiece.
      I'd only use it for occasional photography but would rather buy one with a T-thread.
      For reference here are the different branded versions I can find:
      OVL Hyperflex version: https://www.firstlightoptics.com/ovl-eyepieces/hyperflex-72mm-215mm-eyepiece.html
      Skywatcher Hyperflex version: https://www.365astronomy.com/SkyWatcher-HyperFlex-7E-7.2-21.5mm-High-Performance-Zoom-Eyepiece.html
       
      I had read in the previous thread that the Lunt version of this zoom is also generic but the only one I can find looks quite different and is twice as expensive and has a different field of view so not sure about that?
      https://www.firstlightoptics.com/lunt-solar-accessories/lunt-125-zoom-eyepiece-72mm-215mm.html
      Thanks for any feedback (or any other recommendations for circa £100 zoom lens that might have a hidden T-thread)!!!
       
    • By acr_astro
      Hi all,
      as well today the sun is shining brightly here. I set up the Lunt to have a look at it, at first just for observing. However, somehow I cannot resist and have to do a sketch This time I've chosen reddish pastels on grey paper to better catch the color of the view in the eyepiece.

      Telescope: Lunt LS50THaB600PT
      Eyepiece: Celestron X-cel 10mm
      Date & Time: May 15th, 2020 / 1400-1430 CEST
      Location: home terrace, Dusseldorf region, Germany
      Technique: red and orange Koh-i-Noor pastels and pastel pens on grey Canson Mi-Teintes pastel paper
      Size: 24 x 32 cm
      Clear (and sunny) skies!
      Achim
    • By Bajastro
      I finished observations of the Mizar A spectroscopic binary.
      Calibration for the Hα line made on water lines contained in the Earth's atmosphere.
      I used LowSpec spectrograph with 1800 grooves/mm reflective holographic grating, APM APO 107/700, QHY163M camera and HEQ5 mount with guiding.
      It turned out that the Earth's movement practically compensated for the radial velocity of the Mizar A system.
      Based on the analysis, I received the result:
      vr = -8.8 km/s
      in fact the system is approaching at a radial velocity of -6.3 km/s.

      I also determined the phase plot of radial velocities based on my measurements for the Na (together for both lines) and separately for Hα line:




      Error is based on half my spectral resolution (0.2 Å/pix corresponds to rv = 10 km/s). Each measurement corresponds to the stack a few images.

      The most important purpose of observing this binary system was to record the historical Ca II line (often called as CaK, 3933.66 Å).
      The distances in the violet part of the spectrum are almost 2x smaller than the corresponding shifts for the Hα line. This line initiated the discovery of spectroscopically binary systems, and Mizar A was the first discovered system of this type.

      These were the spectroscopic observations in the 19th century:



      Source: https://www.leosondra.cz/en/mizar/#b20

      I've made several observations of this line in the last two weeks:



      Animation showing the changes in the CaK line based on my observations:



      Not only the Ca II is split, but the surrounding lines also, shown below in a wider environment:



      Balmer hydrogen lines are becoming more dense as Balmer's gap approaches (3646 Å).

      Observation result of the Hα line:



      And animation showing the changes in this line:



      The Na I doublet was much more difficult to observe, because stars with A spectral type contain very faint lines of this metal:



      Animation showing the changes in the sodium doublet:



      We received the sodium quartet
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.