Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_dslr_mirrorlesss.thumb.jpg.5b348d6a5e7f27bdcb79e9356b7fc03b.jpg

Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone

I need some eyepiece recommendations.

I currently own a set of Meade Series 4000 UWA and SWA eyepieces. These are my pride and joy and are awesome eyepieces. Much better than the new Series 5000 range.

I've not been keeping up with equipment news and reviews for a few years as I prefer my current eyepieces.

However, I'm getting back into public observing events and was hoping you could recommend good UWA eyepieces that won't break the bank. I can't afford Televue and I wouldn't want to use works of art such as Televue or my Meade eyepieces for public use.

What are the current good Ultra Wide Angle eyepiece offerings? What should I look out for and what should I avoid?

Cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For outreach then by far the most used eyepieces in my set up are the 14mm and 20mm ES 82' examples.  I use them all the time in my ED80 and Lunt Ha Solar Scope.  Both were purchased secondhand in great condition from this very forum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the recommendation. I will check them out. I've had the odd bit of Explore Scientific kit in the past and it wasn't bad. Cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The ES 82's are better performers than the Meade's you have in my view. Very close to Tele Vue Nagler performance.

The Nirvanas are very nice as well although their range of focal lengths is limited to 4mm, 7mm, 16mm and 28mm (a 2 inch eyepiece):

https://www.harrisontelescopes.co.uk/acatalog/skywatcher-nirvana-eyepieces.html

Again the Nirvana's are probably better performers than most of the 4000 Meade series eyepieces.

Maybe the Meades are the ones to use for the outreach events ?

What scope will you be using the eyepieces with ? - low cost ultra wide eyepieces don't do so well when the focal ratio drops below F/7 or so.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If these are for public use not your own then I think cheaper is better. If it has to be UWA then Nirvanas or whatever appears on the second hand market at a reasonable price.

If you change your mind and want something better for your own use, perhaps push the boat out a bit and look at the Baader Morpheus range.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Ricochet said:

If these are for public use not your own then I think cheaper is better. If it has to be UWA then Nirvanas or whatever appears on the second hand market at a reasonable price.

Agree, especially where children are involved. For some reason there's always one of two small boys (for it is normally boys!) who insist on grabbing the eyepiece or sticking their finder on the eye lens. Partly because they get so excited, which is a good thing. Easily cleaned, of course.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you John, Ricochet and Jeremy S

I will be using the eyepieces with a 10 inch Skywatcher Dobsonian and possibly a Meade ETX 125 as well if it's busy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, VirtualAstro said:

I currently own a set of Meade Series 4000 UWA and SWA eyepieces. These are my pride and joy and are awesome eyepieces. Much better than the new Series 5000 range.

🤔 Did you actually compare the discontinued Meade Series 5000 SWAs against the 4000 SWAs?  I've found that the 5000 series perform very closely to the TV Panoptics while the 4000 series perform more closely with the older TV Widefields.  I love my decloaked 40mm 5000 SWA for widest field views.  It is very sharp and well corrected across the field at f/6.

I've also compared the 14mm 4000 UWA against the 14mm Pentax XL and Morpheus, and 12mm Nagler T4 and ES-92, and in all cases, the Meade has much poorer contrast and stray light control.  It is fairly well corrected to the edge, reasonably sharp, and is usable with eyeglasses (at least the smoothie I have) without any kidneybeaning.  However, it lives in my spare eyepieces case.

For outreach, I'd pick up some used 70 degree, long eye relief eyepieces such as the Celestron Ultima LX, TS Optics Expanse, AstroTech AF70, Omegon Redline, Tecnosky Superwide HD, Olivon 70, etc.  Correction is good enough for outreach, they have enough eye relief for eyeglasses wearers so they don't have to refocus (adults are too timid to touch the focuser and so live with a blurry image), and they're pretty cheap used ($70 to $80 typically here in the states) so you won't get upset when some sticks a finger into the eyelens asking if that is where they're supposed to look.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll be looking at one of the cheaper zoom EPs for the school observing sessions in the autumn.

It'll cut down on the time taken to switch EPs. :)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, bingevader said:

I'll be looking at one of the cheaper zoom EPs for the school observing sessions in the autumn.

It'll cut down on the time taken to switch EPs. :)

My outreach eyepiece set is:

- 7.2-21.5mm zoom eyepiece

- Baader 2.25x barlow lens

- Orion 27mm Edge-On eyepiece

This set covers a lot of options, cost relatively little, is easy to view through and all three items can fit in my coat pockets easily :smiley:

In fact I seem to be using these quite often when observing on my own at home as well.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By borapanda
      Hi everyone!
      I have a Celestron Astromaster 114 eq (114/1000mm), and I do use it whenever I can, but I'm still quite the newbie when it comes to observing.
      My point is, I'd like to observe the planets, but  I dont't think the standard eyepieces that came with my telescope (10 mm and 20 mm) are powerful enough for that. For reference, the "furthest" I could see were the rings of Saturn , but they were very small and faint too.  
      Are there any specific eyepieces you could recommend? :) And of course, any tipps and advice are also very much appreciated.
      Thanks, Sophie.
    • By DavidJM
      Looking for my first televue eyepiece
      25mm 1.25" barrel plossl, happy with used as long as great quality, bank transfer preferred payment
      Sorry, can't stretch to other Televue models
    • By Kronos831
      Hey guys!i need to make this quick! I want to get a new 6mm eyepiece.I have a 8" f6 dob and i want to get a nice 200 mag and put the telescope to its limits at 400x
      The most i ve seen with is 240x for Jupiter and Saturn .i ve heard they looked stunning at 400x and i am keen on trying it.Ive got my eyes on a 6mm Skywatcher UWA eyepiece.and i have a Bst Starguider 2z Barlow lens.And i seem to be having problems with my 8mm Bst Starguider (300x in total).the bst has a 16mm eye relief and a 21mm lens diameter,but when i barlowed it and look at the moon yesterday,it was hard finding the right spot to look through the eyepiece and when i moved the image disappeared.I dont know if it will have that effect on planets,when I looked at mars it was fine but i definitely want to avoid that from happening again.Will it happen?
      The Skywatcher eyepiece i want to buy has a 16mm eye relief too.I dont want to make the same mistake now , i want a 6mm eyepiece at the price range of 50-70 euro either from flo or amazonuk.If the Skywatcher will have similar results,can you suggest another one?
    • By astronomer2002
      I thought my eyepiece collection was complete until I bought my "last ever" telescope. This operates at a native F8 and is just over 3250mm fl.
      I have the longer Naglers, 31, 26, 22, 17 etc and  35mm, 27mm Panoptics.  I was always a little disappointed with the kidney-beaning in the Naglers in other telescopes, though they were overall better than any other eyepiece I have used, but in this one they seem to be affected less and even the 26mm  is now a keeper. Before I got the Naglers (over many years all s/h) I had 35, 27 and 19 Panoptics. These were my favorite eyepieces until the Naglers came along. I kept the 35mm as stars seemed a little sharper in the inner 50 degrees than the Naglers, but trailed off in the outer regions and the 27mm as it really is an exceptional eyepiece.  In any case I often wanted to darken the sky with higher magnification so the longest ones were primarily used for sweeping and finding. Given sky brightness is becoming more of an issue I thought I would never need a longer focal length. Now the Naglers seem sharper over the entire view and with the higher magnification of a longer scope the sky is darker and I hanker after the widest possible field.
      The issue is that the 82 degree 31mm Nagler gives me a true fov of 0.78 degrees and the 35 mm Panoptic 0.73 degrees. There is noticeably more sky in the 31mm Nagler. A 41mm Panoptic will yield 0.85 degrees, an improvement of nearly 10% over the Nagler 31. As I can readily see the difference in the amount of sky covered by the 31mm Nagler and the 35mm Panoptic I believe the time to look at a 41mm Panoptic is here.
      Before going into a debate on whether ES eyepieces could fill the slot all I can say is that having been able to compare my old Naglers with new 82 degree ES ones in my scopes I and convinced that, for me, there is a small improvement with the Naglers at the outer regions of the field and so I am minded to discount them. They are fantastic value and I won't deny they are very good eyepieces.
      The 41mm Panoptic would seem fit the bill for this long fl scope though I suspect it would be a disaster in a fast Newtonian, which I also have.
      My quest is to find someone willing to part with theirs and/or suggestions of an alternative that someone has used in practice.
      Thankyou for reading
       
      Ian B
       
       
       
       
       
    • By fwm891
      SOLD - Morpheus 6.5 - 76° eyepiece. 1¼" and 2" barrel
      Purchased about a month ago, a really great eyepiece - so still in mint condition.  Includes the accessories in the photos.
      Asking £130.00 posted RM signed for (UK mainland). PP gift or add PP fees   + Full courier cost (delivery & insurance) elsewhere
      Francis
      Reason for sale: Prefer longer focal lengths giving wider fov's


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.