Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

# Confused with aperture, & exit pupil - what will I see?

## Recommended Posts

lets imagine I wasn't to see a nice DSO about 15' size and I think it should look good nicely framed with a 1 deg field of view in the EP..

Which would give the better (or higher probability of seeing anything at all ) view from a semi urban light polluted home site (e.g Bortle 6)?

a) an 100mm f/6 refractor (fl 600mm) and a 10mm EP (60 deg afov, gain 60x = fov pf 1 deg)
(and exit pupil of 100mm / 60 = 1.6mm)

or

b) a  200mm SCT with focal reducer to give f/6 (fl 1200mm) and a 20mm EP (60 deg afov, gain 60x = fov of 1 deg)
(and exit pupil of 200 / 60 = 3.3mm)

My gut feeling is that the SCT should give a better view just based upon its 2xaperture - but Im not sure I understand fully the maths why.
Is the larger exit pupil going to result in a better / brighter / more successful view?
Or will the view be 'roughly' the same ?
Or have I got it all wrong.....

Thanks.

##### Share on other sites

Exit pupil is eyepiece focal length / telescope focal ratio.

Exit pupil is the size of the light beam not the size of what it sees. Imagine holding binoculars in your hand, exit pupil is the bright little light patch you see on the area youo would look through.

Whether using a focal reducer effects exit pupil calculation I don't know.

Edited by happy-kat

##### Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, happy-kat said:

Whether﻿ using a focal reducer effects exit pupil calculation I don't﻿ know.

Yes it does as it effectively reduces the focal length of the scope so reduces the focal ratio resulting in a larger exit pupil.

##### Share on other sites

With 2x the aperture a 200mm scope actually has 4x the light gathering area of a 100mm aperture so it's going to show DSO's better.

With SCT's and mak-cassegrains the long focal length restricts the size of the true field of view that is attainable so larger DSO's may not fit into the field of view. But if it can fit in, it should be brighter and more detailed than in a 100mm aperture scope.

##### Share on other sites

The SCT and focal reducer is superfluous to what I was trying to work out.

I was trying to understand why the larger aperture scope would give the better view. Since they both have the same overall F ratio in this example and the fov using the 2 eyepieces is the same.
Im thinking that (assuming the eye pupil remains fully open and is larger than the exit pupil)  the exit pupil is effectively controlling the aperture of the eye. Since size of the rods/cones are fixed in size (and treating them like a camera sensor) - so the larger exit pupil in this case is allowing the eye to have a higher f/ratio of its own and hence brighter and more differentiated light levels between the background and the subject view.
(as well as more detail due to the higher aperture resolution of the scope - and ignoring any sampling at the eye).

##### Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Fraunhoffer said:

The﻿ SCT and focal reducer is superfluous to what I was trying to work out.﻿﻿

Yes, I was just answering the question from happy-kat.

In some ways, the more interesting or relevant question is what happens when you keep the exit pupils the same as it directly illustrates the benefit of a larger scope.

Strangely enough, the even the largest scopes cannot make the surface brightness of extended DSOs brighter than they appear with the naked eye. What they can do is maintain brightness at larger image scales which helps with visibility and allows your eye to detect contrast more easily.

In your example, with both scopes giving an exit pupil of 3.3mm, the 100mm refractor will only be giving a magnification of x30. So, the SCT example can maintain the same surface brightness for the object at twice the image scale.

##### Share on other sites

Isn't the exit pupil of both telescopes in this example 1.6mm

10/6

##### Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, happy-kat said:

Isn't the exit pupil of both telescopes in this example 1.6mm

10/6

one is 10/6 and the other is 20/6.

exit_pupil = ep.focal_length / (t.focal_ratio)
= ep.focal_lenght / (t.focal_length / t.aperture)
= (ep.focal_length / t.focal_length) * t.aperture
= t.aperture / (t.focal.length/ep.focal_lengh)
= t.aperture / gain

sorry for the shorthand.

## Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×

• ### Similar Content

• Hi, want to get a new telescope, SkyWatcher Evostar 90 EQ2 or SkyWatcher heritage 130p? i saw many suggested refractor is good for planets, i mostly target planets, moon and some star only, live in city.  need some advice. thanks.

• Hi, i have a Celestron ExploraScope 70AZ,  when i look at the saturn or jupiter (low or high magnification) the picture is clear if the object is at middle of my viewing but blurry and color mismatch if the object is at left side of the viewing.
• By Tugboat
I'm having a bit of a clearout to make way for a new project.  For sale here are a couple of items that have seen very litle use:
1) Celestron Omni CG-4 GEM Mount + Tripod - £125 *** SOLD ***
This is in generally very good condition.  There are a few marks, and scuffs consistent with normal use.  There are also a couple of minor (small) patches of surface rust on a few of the bolts and steel legs.  It has seen very litle use, and has been in storage for the past few years so it is time to find it a good home.  The small rubber tips that go on the very end of the feet have perished, so these won't be included.
It includes tubular steel tripod, 2 counterweights, built in polar scope, built in bubble level and slow motion controls.
Due to size and weight, collection would be preferred from the RG27 area.  If you are reasonably local, I would also consider delivering.
Price: £125, but I am open to offers.  Payment can be made via Bank Transfer (preferred), Paypal or cash on collection
2) ***SOLD*** Celestron Omni XLT 127mm Telescope ***SOLD ***
Again this is in very good condition, and has been in storage for the past few years and has had very little overall use.  A few marks on the dovetail as is to be expected.
It includes a small finderscope, diagonal and a 25mm eyepiece
Can be collected from the RG27 area, I could deliver if you are reasonably local, or can be posted for an additional £8.
Price: £110, but am open to offers.  Payment can be made via Bank Transfer (preferred), Paypal or cash on collection *** NOW SOLD ***
Any questions please do let me know.

• By Gregely
Hi SGL
I popped this topic on CN too but noone seems to know anything.

I came by an old Celestron Ultima 8 pre-PEC. I really like the scope and the mount it may be that I have read too much of Uncle Rod's and other's praise that I feel this scope has some intangible personality and charm.
Anyway...
Circuitry in the base seems to work fine even though the batteries don't hold charge but drive the Ra axis . I have 2 replacement on its way to me.
Now my issue: It didn't come with a hand controller. I know it is not needed for tracking, and I don't have a Dec motor but I find it would be useful for centering in RA and D.A.R.V. method drift alignment.
I was on the verge of making a crude controller out of veroboard and 4 momentary switches that I thought to be correct from the info on various sites, but then I came across an Ultima 8 project that clearly showed the hand controller for my scope.
The pic attached is the one.

I am looking for help on how the dial and buttons are wired in and/or photos of the innards of the hand controller or if anyone knows what else is inside the handbox.
The sources I was going on so far is a combination of the following 3 links:
https://www.cloudyni...ding/?p=8015749
https://onstep.group...in/message/6300

These of course don't include drive rate rotary switch in the middle and if I could I would really like to to restore the full ability of this mount without spending too much  on electronics. Plus I don't want to spend time and effort on wiring something that doesn't work.

Oh and lastly I have no background  or experience in electronics just own a soldering station and a whole lot of determination.