Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

stargazine_ep20_banner.thumb.jpg.c34e90166f1f5aa93f5211765a962cda.jpg

Recommended Posts

So I'm looking for the best grab and go planetary viewing (and maybe some DSOs) telescope that is relatively cheap (below 500$) that will also support some Astrophotography. I know the SkyMax 127 is a Maksutov and therefore has a high F number, but I'm okay with that because I'll just pop on a 0.5x focal reducer to bring it down to F/6 (still a bit high though.) With said Grab and Go I'm interested in viewing Saturn and Jupiter with high detail. What do you recommend?

 

Clear skies,

Leon.

Edit: I need one that'll fit into the Sky Watcher EQ5.

Edited by LR Watanabe
Forgot to mention which mount I'll be using

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm very pleased with the Skymax 127, it's lightweight, short and well made, the ideal grab and go scope in my book.

Of course it needs some time to cool down to ambient, but that should be an issue.

You always reed about how a Mak is best used for planetary observing, but in my experience it does a great job on the brighter DSO's, certainly most Messier objects are no problem.

As astrophotography goes, i've only used it for Lunar work, i wouldn't know if putting a 0,5 reducer on it would be pushing it too far.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hm, I see!

The Skymax DOES please me, only problem being that the EPs it takes are 1.25" ones...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know of any dedicated Mak focal reducers.  Those generic 0.5x FRs induce terrible field curvature, so I wouldn't use one for photography.  I have heard of folks using a 0.63x SCT reducer on a Mak, but only because they had one already.  I've not seen any photos proving it works well, though.

Used 127mm Maks are only $200 here in the states, so that leaves $300 for other stuff like a nice mount.  They are pretty close to bullet proof, so buy used with confidence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you'll be happy with Mak127 in intended role, except for AP.

What sort of camera are you planning to use it with? Thing with x0.5 reducer is that it is going to "squeeze" available field into smaller region. I think that Mak127 has about 20mm or so fully illuminated field - I'm not sure about that one. This means that any sensor larger than 10mm in diameter will start to vignette if you use it with x0.5 reducer. This is of course if you are happy with such reducer optical performance (which is questionable).

For this reason, I would consider Mak127 for planetary / lunar AP only (and obviously visual like mentioned).

If you are really keen on doing some AP - maybe start off with camera and simple lens on EQ5 and do some wide field shots first. Later on, you can switch to scope when funds allow - maybe something like 130PDS. That one will not be grab and go, probably inferior on planets than Mak - but will give you wider field DSO capability for viewing alongside AP.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do love Maks, they are pretty much bomb proof, lightweight and easy to mount and the views are jaw dropping at times on the right targets that suit its narrow field of view. I use a smaller version for lunar imaging and do like the secure way a heavy DSLR camera can be fixed to the visual back, I also find the Mak makes a decent long f/l telephoto lens for daytime use too.

Alan

Edited by Alien 13

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Everyone, thank you so so much for all your lovely replies! Just to clear things up, I’ll be using a Canon T3i (I know a CMOS Colour is better but alas). The Mak I’ll probably use for solely the photography of planets, and of course, the visual observation of planets like Saturn. Also, Vlaiv is right— I can’t find a focal reducer for the a Mak.

Anyways, other than the Skymax, what’s another good alternative that’ll feed my hunger for viewing planets?

Much love,

Leon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Bresser 127 mak (or the Explore Scientific version) is an alternaive. A bit more expensive but a bit better as well. Also it’s a full 127mm aperture wheras the Skymax is actually 118mm. Not sure about the price in Japan thpugh. 

https://www.firstlightoptics.com/bresser-telescopes/bresser-messier-mc-127-1900-maksutov-cassegrain-ota.html

Edited by johninderby

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good long focal length newtonian in same aperture is going to be very good planetary scope.

On the other hand in given budget, you'll be hard pressed to find better planetary scope than a decent 8" F/6 dob mounted newtonian. This will however be much removed from grab and go concept as it is fairly large scope at about 25Kg.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The big plus of a Mak that all other scopes struggle with is the ability to hang any camera off the back regardless of weight without issues of loading and distorting the focusser tube or wondering if you have enough or too much back focus....

Alan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Alien 13 said:

The big plus of a Mak that all other scopes struggle with is the ability to hang any camera off the back regardless of weight without issues of loading and distorting the focusser tube or wondering if you have enough or too much back focus....

Alan

Pretty sure SCTs are in the same category.  One thing I haven't been able to get a definitive answer on is whether or not extending focus further back on Maks adds spherical aberration to the image as it does with SCTs.  Does anyone know if moving focus far off of the design focus point for Maks adds aberrations to the image?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Louis D said:

Pretty sure SCTs are in the same category.  One thing I haven't been able to get a definitive answer on is whether or not extending focus further back on Maks adds spherical aberration to the image as it does with SCTs.  Does anyone know if moving focus far off of the design focus point for Maks adds aberrations to the image?

I agree SCT have the same strength when fitting cameras.

Would also love to know if changing focus position alters the performance, I can get focus with the DSLR screwed directly onto the built in M42 threads or still have plenty of adjustment to get focus with an additional 2 inch extension tube. My gut feel is that it must be beneficial to have the main mirror as far back as possible so presenting the smallest light cone to the secondary but I could be completely wrong.

Alan

Edited by Alien 13

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By spaceboi
      Hi there! I am seeking for advice from you good people.
      I want to create a setup for stargazing which is fully automated. Ideally every process like scope calibration, guiding, tracking, focusing and taking photos should be done through WiFi, preferably from an iPad tablet.
      Planetary imaging is the main purpose. I don't really care about deep space imaging.
      I want the whole setup to be rather cheap, small and light, at the expense of imaging quality.
      I am a total noob (used to play with an ETX-70 lots of years ago), but I really need the functionality I have described above.
      I am thinking of using the bellow components and kindly request that you correct/add to the list:
      1) AstroFi 102
      2) A ZWO camera suitable for planetary imaging (any ideas for less than or equal to $250)
      3) An auto focuser and motor drive (any ideas)
      4) Smth like an ASi air device?
      Is a guider necessary for planetary imaging, by the way?
      Do you think I am in the right path?
      I still have not been able to really comprehend  the full picture. Is what I am asking for doable?
      Thank you very much in advance!
    • By JimB
      Has anyone fitted a ZWO electronic focuser to an Altair Astro 115 wave series apo with the rack and pinion mounting?
      I'm thinking of buying one and would like to be sure it will fit first. Many thanks.
    • By Interactive
      I am intending to buy a Sky-Watcher Skymax-127 Maksutov-Cassegrain, primarily to make a number of daytime photographic terrestrial observations ranging from 1-5.5 miles, the most distant of which is of a target at 5.5 miles that is about 5 feet in size. The distant target would have an angular size of about 0.01 degrees. To get an object of an angular size of 0.01 degrees to appear as 100pixels vertically on the APS-C sensor (22.3mm x 14.9 mm) of my Canon EOS 250D camera, I would need a telescope/lens with a focal length of about 2.1m. The Skymax 127 with a focal length of 1500mm is pretty close to the required value and if used in combination with a Barlow lens I would be able to get more than the focal length I require.
      The FOV of the Skymax-127 with its 1500mm focal length in combination with the vertical sensor size of 14.9mm gives a field of view that can be derived from the following attached diagram

      which gives a FOV of 0.569°.
      But I would also like to make some lunar and solar observations with my system and capture images of the complete objects, and the maximum angular size of the Moon at perigee is 0.568°, so in theory the FOV of my system at 0.569 should be sufficient to gather the whole of the Moon at its largest angular size.
      But I have seen a video in which someone is using a Celestron SE6, which also has a focal length of 1500mm and when using it with a Canon 60da camera with an ASP-C sensor https://www.dpreview.com/products/canon/slrs/canon_eos60da which has the same size sensor as mine, then the camera does  not seem able to capture a full view of the Moon. The video is at https://www.all-startelescope.com/video/scope-setup/nexstar-6se-dslr . The section where the Canon 60da is used is just before the end of the video and a clipped moon is shown, and then a full sized sensor camera is used to capture the whole Moon.
      Does this video not suggest that my camera with its APS-C sensor coupled with the Skymax 127 with its 1500mm focal length would not be able to capture the whole Moon, despite my calculations suggesting that it would?
      I understand that a reducer does not work well with a Muksatov-Cassegrain, so if I buy this telescope and use it in conjunction with my Canon250D, am I doomed never to be able to get an image of the complete moon?
      Thanks in advance for any suggestions/help etc
    • By Abhinav
      which webcam is best for planetary imaging under 25 USD . If you have experience of any webcam for planetary work please help me out 
       
    • By Cliffy Biro
      Hello, I have been lurking in the background for the last few months, reading the great posts from many very knowledgable members, I’m now after some personal equipment advice and thought it was time I asked the pros!
      I’ve been interested in the stargazing for a long time and have been enjoying casual scanning with tripod mounted binoculars for the past year. Up until now, due to work commitments, I’ve been unable to dedicate much time to my interest. However, I recently changed jobs and now have a lot more free time and the opportunity to really get started.
      I’m in Yorkshire, fairly rural and not too much light pollution. I’ll be setup primarily from the garden but I’m only five minutes drive from remote moorland for any local out-of-home viewing. My aim initially is visual viewing and studying with a good quality scope. I worked as a photographer a long time ago so further down the line I’d like to try AP and add a second scope specifically for imaging. I’m thinking long term overall but would like to jump in with a solid core setup I can add to over time. My budget can be up to £2,500.
      After much research I’m considering the Sky Watcher AZ-EQ5 or AZ-EQ6 mount - both these seem highly regarded and adaptable to future needs, I believe the EQ6 may be better considering future imaging use? For the OTA I’ve been looking at the Celestron 9.25? It seems to deliver well for planets and lunar but I would welcome personal recommendations of other ideal scopes within budget. I’ve also briefly looked into accessories such as the Baader Hyperion Zoom Eyepiece and William Optics / Baader diagonals but one area I need to know more about is eyepieces.
      Thanks for your time, I’d really welcome advice from you all on what I should consider for my aims and budget.
      Cheers 🙂
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.