Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_30_second_exp_2.thumb.jpg.7719b6f2fbecda044d407d8aba503777.jpg

Sign in to follow this  
eshy76

NGC281 The Pacman Nebula in Narrowband

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

This has been on my hard drive for some months, so nice to have finally got round to processing it! Shot over several nights in January in my back garden.

NGC 281, also known casually as the Pacman Nebula, is a bright emission nebula and part of an H II region in the northern constellation of Cassiopeia and is part of the Milky Way's Perseus Spiral Arm. It lies about 9,500 light years from us and is 48 light years across.

As the final version, I've gone for a crop, which I think holds up well, though I'll include the wider fov version in the next post.

I used a more natural colour blend for this image:

R = 76%*Ha + 24%*SII
G = 100%*OIII
B = 85%*OIII + 15%*Ha

For some reason, I was not expecting much from this image, but the result looks like it will be one of my favourites...the narrowband data was really good!

Captured using APT, stacked using APP and processed in Pixinsight.

5.4 hours integration time.

Link to full details and higher res version.

Thanks for looking!

NGC281_2019_01_20_Natural_Crop-900x676.png.6758d4dabd29f31772c9f8c36fa916fe.png

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And here's the original field of view

NGC281_2019_01_20_Natural_Wide-900x678.png.4befc01779f9add16b85429d2f176cdf.png

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Both look very nice indeed and to think you were not expecting much from, turned out well, must try this myself when my roof allows me to.

Alan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, alan potts said:

Both look very nice indeed and to think you were not expecting much from, turned out well, must try this myself when my roof allows me to.

Alan

Thank you Alan - yes, I collected the data pretty much as a side project to the tadpole/flaming star mosaic I was working on. It wasn't one of my primary targets for the winter - I was also after M45 and the Horsehead - so the data just got forgotten. But processing the clean narrowband data was a pleasure and NGC 281 itself surprised me with its pillars of dust and the little star cluster at its heart. It's a beautiful object in its own right, which I realised when I zoomed in.
 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Xiga
      Hi guys
      First things first, apologies for posting this one out of season. A combination of no astro dark, crappy weather, and being busy at work has meant that there's no imaging getting done at all these days. So, i've had to turn to old data to re-process, and this data set was an obvious candidate as i was never happy with how it came out originally. And looking back on it now with fresh eyes, boy did it need it! 
      Nikon D5300, SW 80ED, HEQ5-Pro. 
      3 x 1200s, 2 x 1380s, and 4 x 1500s of Ha
      9 x 1200s of Oiii. 
      11 x 480s with an IDAS-D1, for RGB stars only
      7 Hrs 54 Mins in Total. 

      Stacked in APP and processed in PS. 
      Combined as SHO (using a 70/30 blend of Ha/Oiii for the Sii). 
      The main differences this time were, using Starnet++ to create the starless versions, using more Ha in the synthesized Sii (70% instead of 50% last time), but mostly the improvement has come from toning down the stretch a lot (ok, a heck of a lot!) before making the colour map for the tone-mapping. From then on it was immediately apparent that i'd made a massive boo-boo first time round 🙈
      I've included a 1080p rotated crop too, as i quite liked the framing.
      Feels like ages since i last did any NB imaging. I almost forgot how much i enjoy it! 🙂 


       
       
      And rather embarrassingly, here's the original. Try not to laugh too hard! 😂 😂 😂

    • By MeyGray3833
      Finally completed my SHO version. There is some purple in the image I cannot figure out how to get rid of and I'm sick of playing with it. Hints and tips on how to get rid of it welcome, I'm using PixInsight.


      https://pbase.com/grahammeyer/image/169136922


      Scroll to the bottom for size options and details.


      Thanks for looking!
       

    • By MeyGray3833
      Hello Astro Peeps, I hope everyone is all good! Isn't there some amazing images on this site and others. Amateur imaging has never been so good!
      I myself have finally managed to get some data for an image, of which I am very happy. It has been so hot here it has been impossible to get any good data. One day a couple of months ago, I hung the thermometer from the grape vine under the back verandah and it was 47.5°C. Sounds far fetched, although true. I live in Adelaide, South Australia and we are 11km from the CBD and usually 1.5 degrees hotter than there!
      Anyway, I thought I'd try my hand at a Ha, OIII bi-colour image while waiting for my SII data to come in. There seems to be a halo issue with some of the filters for which I will need to do further testing so I apologise for their distracting nature. Details are with the image but basically 3hrsx15min subs for each channel.
      https://pbase.com/grahammeyer/image/169113477
      You can scroll to the bottom to choose another size or auto to fit your screen.
       
      Happy photon collecting! ?
      Details for those that cannot see them.
      Telescope: William Optics FLT132

      Guide Scope: QHY OAG

      Camera: QHY9 Mono @ -20c

      Filter Wheel: QHY 7 position Ultra Slim

      Filters: Baader 36mm unmounted L R G B HA OIII SII

      Guide Camera: QHY5L-II

      Mount: AZ-EQ6

      Mount Control: EQASCOM

      Focusing: SharpSky Pro and Sequence Generator Pro 3 (automated)

      Bahtinov Mask: No (initial focus)

      Capture Software: Sequence Generator Pro 3

      Guiding Software: PHD2

      Calibration and Stacking Software: PixInsight

      Processing Software: PixInsight

      Number and Type of Data Frames: L= X min, R= x min, G= x min, B= x min

      Ha= 12x15min, SII= x , OIII= 12x15min.

      Binning: 1x1

      Total Image Time: 6 hrs

      Location: Lockleys Observatory B, Tanunda, Sth Australia

      Light Box by Exfso
         
    • By Stargazer33
      Hi, this question has probably been done to death here, but can I ask the community to help me decide on a new camera?
      After struggling with my very glitchy QHY5LIIc camera for a while, as well as having a forced break from astronomy, I have decided to get a new camera. After all the problems I've been having with the QHY, I really don't want to use this manufacturer again. I know lots of people use them quite happily, but once bitten ...
      I have been looking at the ZWO cameras - OSC, as I haven't the time, clear skies, or patients to do LRGB imaging!
      I have about £250 to spend, which I may be able to push to £300 if I wait a bit. ? So I've been looking at the ASI224MC, ASI290MC and the ASI178MC cameras.
      I mainly do planetary/Luna imaging, but I have also dabbled in a bit of DSO and would like to continue with both. I have a C9.25 and a ST80 guide scope. I know these aren't ideal for DSOs but please humour me!
      I think from the specs/information that the 224 is probably the best option. Although the resolution and QE are the worst of the three, the well depth and read noise are the best and the fps is pretty good too.
      I don't know if there are better/cheaper cameras using the same chips, such as Altair's range. I just don't want to make the same mistake that I did with the QHY!n
      Any help/advice you can give will be much appreciated.?
    • By masjstovel
      Hi,
       
      I am looking at buying one of these, and need some guidance.
      Celestron Nexstar 4 SE
      Sky-Watcher Explorer-130P Synscan AZ GOTO
      Celestron Nexstar 127 SLT MAK
       
      I ended up With these 3 Choices mostly because of the cost I am willing to do the first time, and it seems like they have some abilities (motorized with GoTo-options)
      Priority 1: I want to observe nebulas, and galaxies (i.e. Andromeda)  on a decent "zoom" and focus.
      Priority 2: I want to do astrophotography.

      I've read elsewhere on the forum than its preferable to have an equatorial mount for astrophotography. As far as i can see none of the above have that, even if Celestron Nexstar 4SE is promoting astrophotography on the product info. Or have i misunderstood here and one of the above has an equatorial mount?
      The Product info on the Celestron Nexstar 4 SE says it has Alt-Az, EQ North & EQ South. Does this mean it has both options, az-al and equatorial mount?.
       
      I think should add that i consider myself at least an "above beginner"-photographer, and Photoshop user. I use NIKON D810 - is this even mountable on one of the telescopes mentioned here?
      I also have the Sky-Watcher Star Adventurer mini. Can i setup one of the telescopes mentioned with this and call it a telescope with equatorial mount? 

      I guess some of these questions might seem stupid to you, but I just dont know alot regarding telescopes yet:)

      Thanks in advance for any replies.
         
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.