Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I've just ordered a Sky-Watcher Skymax 150 PRO from FLO. It will replace my wonderful 250px which is simply taking up too much room amongst my kids' growing population of Peppa Pig and friends!

Will I miss the wider field of view and the light gathering capabilities of the big(ish) dob in my little backyard in averagely light polluted Bedford?  I've read good things about the MAK but I'm nervous!

Part of my motivation was that I want to be able to share the joy of the night skies with my young kids (6 & 3). The dob is fabulous but it's not that easy for them to see through the eyepiece without knocking it off target. I have an HEQ5  Pro mount (which I've never used). I'm hoping that, along with the MAK, the kids might have a better chance of seeing things and being inspired rather than frustrated.

I'll almost certainly sell the 250px asap and free-up the space for 'Peppa Pig land'.

I hope I'm not making a grave (and expensive) mistake!

Best wishes,

Jason

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What not chat to FLO about the fact it might not have been the right option for you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I felt about as nervous as you when I took the plunge and bought my Mak 150. That feeling was quickly quashed the minute I aimed it at the moon/planets, yes it has a more narrow FOV but, wider eyepieces work great to alleviate that. Oh yeah, it does a good job on brighter DSO’s also, M42 was beautiful recently and revealed E&F stars which was a treat. As mentioned above, one look at the moon and planets once that scope has reached temperature and you won’t turn back.

Besides that, with the most inexpensive camera you can imagine (Neximage 5) I have managed great planetary images, the 150 Mak is a little gem, you couldn’t pry it from my cold dead hands. 

Edited by Sunshine
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think you need to worry! A 150mm scope is a very powerful tool and could serve you well for a lifetime. Maksutov's have a well deserved reputation for producing sharp high definition views, so what you feel you may lose in light grasp and resolution,  may be compensated for with finer definition and contrast.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reassurance! I'm feeling very excited now! 

I've been trying to get my head around calibration and alignment of the HEQ6 pro mount now. It's a new learning curve for me so I've been scratching my head and scouring this forum and youtube which have been a wealth of information as always! 

I'll report back once I've had my 'first light' moment!

Best wishes,

Jason 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had the same dilema as you , Jason ...i went through 3 scopes before i settled on a 180 mak ... ive not had the best chance to use it yet , and its certainly a different proposition from my 250 dob and my lovely little WO Z73 ( which i hate myself for parting with). But , i , like you , think the Mak is the way to go .. it was when i looked at the Plaides that i knew i had done the right thing .. especially with Mars close by . Im looking forward to seeing the planets and the moon in more detail . Now all we need is some lovely clear nights . Good luck , mate .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Stu1smartcookie said:

it was when i looked at the Plaides that i knew i had done the right thing

That's interesting. I would have thought the Pleiades would have been one of the less suitable targets for a Mak with narrow field of view? I prefer it framed by some dark sky to put it in context.

That aside, Maks are great scopes. If you get on top of the dew and cooling the contrast is excellent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes , you are right,of course, but i was actually surprised that i had at least some of the cluster in view . For me , nothing will come close to the wide angle WO Z73 , but i took the plunge with my mak 180 and i don't regret it . I was a bit worried when people told me the cooling times on a mak , but i found it to be reasonable . Also , i do find that focusing is a bit tricky sometimes  .. there is a really small sweet spot.. i guess  that is normal for these scopes . Or am i doing something wrong ?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cooling time seems to negatively affect the high power views rather than lower power observing. My 12 inch dob provides good views at 50-70x straight out of the house. For 200x-300x 30-40 minutes cool down make a big difference to the image quality.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By astrosathya
      Recently I had belt modded my HEQ5-PRO and last night i gave it a full run and i was absolutely stunned to say the least about the guiding results I achieved. I was left wondering if its even too good to be true! 
      Below are Before and After images of guiding.


    • By Martin AB Cohen
      After trying and failing some time ago to find a video tutorial on how to strip-down my Skywatcher HEQ5 Pro mount, clean all the bearings and gears, re-grease them, and put it all back together again, I eventually learned how to do this from various other online resources and have now created my own video tutorial. For those of you with a Skywatcher HEQ5 or HEQ5 Pro mount, or indeed an Orion Sirius EQ-G mount (which is the same mechanically), this video can help you to keep you mount running smoothly through regular DIY servicing (~every 2 years).  I hope you find it useful.  Here is the link...
       
    • By Dimitry
      Hi all,
      With the advice I'm getting here, I'm planning to start my hobby with Skywatcher Maksutov 102 telescope. There are several models with this optical design, BUT it looks like they all sold out! 
      Almost all... FLO still could sell a Mak on the older EQ2 mount. https://www.firstlightoptics.com/maksutov/skywatcher-skymax-102-eq2.html 
      What would yo say about this combination - is it an obsolete scope, or the same as modern versions? How it this mount? I gather it can be also used as Alt-As, right? 
      And one more question, with this long focal length I think as a beginner I'm running into an issue of finding objects with it's FoV. What eyepieces would you recommend to add immediately to this scope? A good price/performance would be great!
      For instance, should I add a 0,5 reducer or a 35-40 mm eyepiece, should I immediately replace 10mm?
      I've read the great post of @The Warthog, so have an idea what focal lengths I'll need (10, 15, 25, 40). Just want to check your opinion what could be ideal price/performer.
       Thank you!
    • By Dimitry
      Hi all, 
      As I'm selecting a new scope with a great help and advice from this community!
      As the optical system is getting clearer, I'm now checking the model. And really puzzled with the new SkyWatcher line: StarQuest. It looks on the paper as exactly the same as the telescopes from the other lines, but costs less.
       
      Example:
      1. https://www.firstlightoptics.com/sky-watcher-az-eq-avant/sky-watcher-skymax-102-az-eq-avant.htm
      2. https://www.firstlightoptics.com/sky-watcher-starquest/sky-watcher-starquest-102mc-f127-maksutov-cassegrain-telescope.html
      Optical specs look identical, mounts are like twins, yet StarQuest is 20% cheaper.
      Have you had any experiences with these telescopes, are there any hidden tricks what aren't visible on the paper specs?
      Does it makes sense to pay extra for a SkyMax on Avant?
       
      And a similar question on a StarQuest refractor https://www.firstlightoptics.com/sky-watcher-starquest/sky-watcher-starquest-102r-f49-achromatic-refractor-telescope.html
      There is no direct comparison, but is the StarQuest is a copy of StarTravel 102 (https://www.firstlightoptics.com/startravel/skywatcher-startravel-102t-ota.html), or it's a different telescope optically and functionally? 
    • By Fred71
      Dear all,
      This is my first post. I'm quite new at astrophotography, although I've used a startravel mount together with a camera for a couple of years. I recently decided to upgrade to a skywatcher heq5 pro mount which I intend to use with a Ed-80 refractor, also from skywatcher.
      I've been spending countless hours trying to solve my problem and I am now to the point where I think my équipement is faulty and needs to be returned to be checked. Before I do, I wanted to ask you guys for advice because I can not exclude the possibility that I'm just doing things wrong. Here is my problem :
      The mount does not track even though I've done the polar alignment and hooked on the synscan handset. I initially believed I would not need the handset for simple tracking and that after polar alignment, the mount would automatically start tracking. Clearly it did not, as the mount did not move and was completely silent. I then hooked on the handset, entered all the info for initialisation, checked the sidareal tracking was checked, but still no tracking, even though the mount did make some noise at that point. I did try to align one or two stars, but the telescope would just be way off the targeted star. I mean totally way off, sometimes pointing the opposite direction. I gave up star alignment, so just skipped the alignment part, thinking I could still use the mount to track without star alignment. However, when pointing to a star, I would see it drift after a few seconds, so clearly no tracking.
      Can somebody help me out?
      Questions: is it possible to use the mount to track without any star alignment, or without using the synscan handset? Is there an on/off button somewhere I have missed to start tracking?
      Any idea why the star alignment is so incredibly off target? I doubled check all the gps, elevation, date info and the polar aligment is accurate as I checked it after a couple of hours and polaris was exactly where it should be according to my Find polaris app.
      I'm quite desperate now, so any advice is more then welcome!
      Thanks.
      fred
       
       
       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.