Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_30_second_exp_2_winners.thumb.jpg.b5430b40547c40d344fd4493776ab99f.jpg

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I've just ordered a Sky-Watcher Skymax 150 PRO from FLO. It will replace my wonderful 250px which is simply taking up too much room amongst my kids' growing population of Peppa Pig and friends!

Will I miss the wider field of view and the light gathering capabilities of the big(ish) dob in my little backyard in averagely light polluted Bedford?  I've read good things about the MAK but I'm nervous!

Part of my motivation was that I want to be able to share the joy of the night skies with my young kids (6 & 3). The dob is fabulous but it's not that easy for them to see through the eyepiece without knocking it off target. I have an HEQ5  Pro mount (which I've never used). I'm hoping that, along with the MAK, the kids might have a better chance of seeing things and being inspired rather than frustrated.

I'll almost certainly sell the 250px asap and free-up the space for 'Peppa Pig land'.

I hope I'm not making a grave (and expensive) mistake!

Best wishes,

Jason

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I felt about as nervous as you when I took the plunge and bought my Mak 150. That feeling was quickly quashed the minute I aimed it at the moon/planets, yes it has a more narrow FOV but, wider eyepieces work great to alleviate that. Oh yeah, it does a good job on brighter DSO’s also, M42 was beautiful recently and revealed E&F stars which was a treat. As mentioned above, one look at the moon and planets once that scope has reached temperature and you won’t turn back.

Besides that, with the most inexpensive camera you can imagine (Neximage 5) I have managed great planetary images, the 150 Mak is a little gem, you couldn’t pry it from my cold dead hands. 

Edited by Sunshine
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think you need to worry! A 150mm scope is a very powerful tool and could serve you well for a lifetime. Maksutov's have a well deserved reputation for producing sharp high definition views, so what you feel you may lose in light grasp and resolution,  may be compensated for with finer definition and contrast.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reassurance! I'm feeling very excited now! 

I've been trying to get my head around calibration and alignment of the HEQ6 pro mount now. It's a new learning curve for me so I've been scratching my head and scouring this forum and youtube which have been a wealth of information as always! 

I'll report back once I've had my 'first light' moment!

Best wishes,

Jason 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had the same dilema as you , Jason ...i went through 3 scopes before i settled on a 180 mak ... ive not had the best chance to use it yet , and its certainly a different proposition from my 250 dob and my lovely little WO Z73 ( which i hate myself for parting with). But , i , like you , think the Mak is the way to go .. it was when i looked at the Plaides that i knew i had done the right thing .. especially with Mars close by . Im looking forward to seeing the planets and the moon in more detail . Now all we need is some lovely clear nights . Good luck , mate .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Stu1smartcookie said:

it was when i looked at the Plaides that i knew i had done the right thing

That's interesting. I would have thought the Pleiades would have been one of the less suitable targets for a Mak with narrow field of view? I prefer it framed by some dark sky to put it in context.

That aside, Maks are great scopes. If you get on top of the dew and cooling the contrast is excellent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes , you are right,of course, but i was actually surprised that i had at least some of the cluster in view . For me , nothing will come close to the wide angle WO Z73 , but i took the plunge with my mak 180 and i don't regret it . I was a bit worried when people told me the cooling times on a mak , but i found it to be reasonable . Also , i do find that focusing is a bit tricky sometimes  .. there is a really small sweet spot.. i guess  that is normal for these scopes . Or am i doing something wrong ?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cooling time seems to negatively affect the high power views rather than lower power observing. My 12 inch dob provides good views at 50-70x straight out of the house. For 200x-300x 30-40 minutes cool down make a big difference to the image quality.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By teoria_del_big_bang
      I had a plan, very simply my HEQ5 was at it's payload limit so needed to upgrade. Part of the upgrade would naturally mean parting with the HEQ5 to regain some much needed cash (Bought this as my Christmas Present now Boiler playing up and really needs replacing not repairing yet again).
      I received my CEM60 with Tri-Pier from FLO as usual within just over 24 hours and had a play with it and love it.
      So time came today to dismantle my old friend and put it up for sale in the usual places.
      BUT, I cannot believe how sad I felt when dismantling it 😞 . I feel such a silly so and so but I feel sort of some attachment to this inanimate object. Only had it just over 2 years but have replaced all the bearings (even though when I striped it down I do not think they were required), added the Rowan Belt modification, spent ages tweaking the backlash out of it the best I could, and when I needed a Losmandy saddle upgraded the original saddle to a dual load saddle.
      Now although sense tells me to sell it as planned I am now wondering whether to keep it in case I ever start to do some imaging other than on my patio. It seems to make no senseas I will probably not use very often but I am a bit of a hoarder anyway and really struggle to part with anything I think will be useful one day (my garage is testimony to this fact 🙂 ).
      I guess the sensible thing is at some stage getting a more light-weight tripod for the CEM60 as the weight difference is not that much to make the HEQ5 any better then the CEM60 for travelling and keeping two setups on APT for each mount may lead to mistakes being made.
      Steve

    • By Miguel1983
      Hi,
      just received this mount today and mounted my scope and accessories, as i was trying to get everything balanced i immediately noticed the RA and DEC aren't smooth at all even at almost full load (see pic) , not handy for balancing i would say.
      Other than that everything seems Ok, the motors do make a short cracking sound wen start and stop slewing, but that's normal i guess, it's not belt driven so..
      Got it running via EQMOD too so HC remains in its package.
      Maybe a little point of criticism, SW should have made the motor cables more flexible.
      Also strange that the counterweight shaft of this tiny mount is 20mm and the shaft on my EQ6R is 18mm.
      I need to check if my EQ6 polemaster adapter fits this mount, let's hope so.
      If anyone has this mount to i'd like too hear if RA and DEC are also not smooth and if a fix is possible.

      Thanks
       
    • By willcastle
      Has anyone used the celestron lithium powertank (the small one, not the pro version) with a skywatcher HEQ5?
      It looks like it should be perfect but that is coming from someone who is relatively clueless
      From the skywatcher specs, it looks like the mount needs 2 amps of current, and the powertank supplies 3, so that should be good?
      It also looks like the power cable is a double-ended tip-positive 2.1 mm plug, so i assume that even though it doesn't have one of those 12V car battery inputs, it shouldn't matter right?
      (just to save people some time, i'm not going to bother with a lead battery / leisure battery / jump-start pack / etc)
    • By I-d-b
      Sky-watcher eco star 72ED with celestron x-cel eyepiece. Diagonal and ax-eq avant tripod  
      for sale in Worthing. 
      excellent condition. 
      £290








    • By Miguel1983
      Hi,
      yesterday i've raided the piggy bank and pulled the trigger on some gear, so the waiting game is on 😏
      FLO order (you're welcome) Esprit 120 without te ES Reid test (contacted FLO, there's no test report delivered afterwards so 🤔) SW flattener for the scope A larger Bahtinov mask (my current one is too small for the 165mm dew shield) A Baader Click Lock for the Esprit 120 A Baader finder shoe (i've read somewhere the standard one isn't that good)  
      TS Optics order APM 330mm Losmandy plate (will mount this one to the bottom and the green one on top) Dew tape 160-200 TS 0,75 APO reducer/corrector  Variable M48 spacer (17-23mm) for getting to 75mm backfocus with the SW flattener Some M48 spacers  TS has already shipped, FLO hasn't, don't know why, i've made sure everything was in stock and i've paid triple shipping cost for Express.
      Anyhow i'm sure i'll get my toys by Wednesday.
      I've doubted on witch reducer to get, i've read good things on the Explore Scientific 3" 0.7 reducer, but that one needed quite some expensive adaptor rings for the same starting price of the TS reducer.
      Does anybody have experience with the 120 + TS reducer ?
      Thanks
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.