Jump to content

stargazine_ep34_banner.thumb.jpg.28dd32d9305c7de9b6591e6bf6600b27.jpg

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I've just ordered a Sky-Watcher Skymax 150 PRO from FLO. It will replace my wonderful 250px which is simply taking up too much room amongst my kids' growing population of Peppa Pig and friends!

Will I miss the wider field of view and the light gathering capabilities of the big(ish) dob in my little backyard in averagely light polluted Bedford?  I've read good things about the MAK but I'm nervous!

Part of my motivation was that I want to be able to share the joy of the night skies with my young kids (6 & 3). The dob is fabulous but it's not that easy for them to see through the eyepiece without knocking it off target. I have an HEQ5  Pro mount (which I've never used). I'm hoping that, along with the MAK, the kids might have a better chance of seeing things and being inspired rather than frustrated.

I'll almost certainly sell the 250px asap and free-up the space for 'Peppa Pig land'.

I hope I'm not making a grave (and expensive) mistake!

Best wishes,

Jason

Link to post
Share on other sites

I felt about as nervous as you when I took the plunge and bought my Mak 150. That feeling was quickly quashed the minute I aimed it at the moon/planets, yes it has a more narrow FOV but, wider eyepieces work great to alleviate that. Oh yeah, it does a good job on brighter DSO’s also, M42 was beautiful recently and revealed E&F stars which was a treat. As mentioned above, one look at the moon and planets once that scope has reached temperature and you won’t turn back.

Besides that, with the most inexpensive camera you can imagine (Neximage 5) I have managed great planetary images, the 150 Mak is a little gem, you couldn’t pry it from my cold dead hands. 

Edited by Sunshine
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think you need to worry! A 150mm scope is a very powerful tool and could serve you well for a lifetime. Maksutov's have a well deserved reputation for producing sharp high definition views, so what you feel you may lose in light grasp and resolution,  may be compensated for with finer definition and contrast.

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reassurance! I'm feeling very excited now! 

I've been trying to get my head around calibration and alignment of the HEQ6 pro mount now. It's a new learning curve for me so I've been scratching my head and scouring this forum and youtube which have been a wealth of information as always! 

I'll report back once I've had my 'first light' moment!

Best wishes,

Jason 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 4 weeks later...

I had the same dilema as you , Jason ...i went through 3 scopes before i settled on a 180 mak ... ive not had the best chance to use it yet , and its certainly a different proposition from my 250 dob and my lovely little WO Z73 ( which i hate myself for parting with). But , i , like you , think the Mak is the way to go .. it was when i looked at the Plaides that i knew i had done the right thing .. especially with Mars close by . Im looking forward to seeing the planets and the moon in more detail . Now all we need is some lovely clear nights . Good luck , mate .

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Stu1smartcookie said:

it was when i looked at the Plaides that i knew i had done the right thing

That's interesting. I would have thought the Pleiades would have been one of the less suitable targets for a Mak with narrow field of view? I prefer it framed by some dark sky to put it in context.

That aside, Maks are great scopes. If you get on top of the dew and cooling the contrast is excellent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes , you are right,of course, but i was actually surprised that i had at least some of the cluster in view . For me , nothing will come close to the wide angle WO Z73 , but i took the plunge with my mak 180 and i don't regret it . I was a bit worried when people told me the cooling times on a mak , but i found it to be reasonable . Also , i do find that focusing is a bit tricky sometimes  .. there is a really small sweet spot.. i guess  that is normal for these scopes . Or am i doing something wrong ?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Cooling time seems to negatively affect the high power views rather than lower power observing. My 12 inch dob provides good views at 50-70x straight out of the house. For 200x-300x 30-40 minutes cool down make a big difference to the image quality.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By lenscap
      If anyone is looking for a used Skyliner 200p dobsonian there is one for sale in Bridgnorth, on Facebook Marketplace.
      No connection with seller.
    • By JoeS81
      Hi everyone,
      I'm completely new to telescopes and know nothing but I want to learn and I need some advice!
      I have a budget of £200 which I can't stretch. I really like both the Skywatcher Heritage 150p and SW Skyliner 150p which I believe has been along longer than the Heritage.
      I would like to take the scope out occasionally to dark skies (so the heritage would be easier to transport) but with 2 very young children at home the reality is that I will mostly be using the scope in the back garden.
      Obviously both scopes are 150p but come with different accessory spec (specs below).... please could someone advise which would give me the most bang for my buck?!
       
      Heritage 150p:
      Magnifications (with eyepieces supplied): x30 & x75
      Highest Practical Power (Potential): x300
      Diameter of Primary Mirror: 150mm
      Telescope Focal Length: 750mm (f/5)
      Eyepieces Supplied (1.25"): 10mm & 25mm
      Parabolic Primary Mirror
      3-arm Secondary Mirror Spider Support
      Red Dot Finder
      Wooden Alt-Azimuth Mount
      Collapsible/ Extendable Tube Assembly
      Weight Approx 7.5kg
      Supplied with Gift Box
      33% more Light Gathering than 130mm
      Skyliner 150p:
      Magnifications (with eyepieces supplied): x48 & x120 Highest Practical Power (Potential): x306 Diameter of Primary Mirror: 153mm Telescope Focal Length: 1200mm (f/8) Eyepieces Supplied (1.25"): 10mm & 25mm Parabolic Primary Mirror 0.5mm Ultra-Thin Secondary Mirror Supports 6x30 Finderscope Direct SLR Camera Connection Wooden Alt-Azimuth Mount with Accessory Tray 73% more Light Gathering than 114mm Many thanks!
       
    • By Astropedro
      Looking to buy either an NEQ6 or a HEQ5 mount.  Im in Cheshire but dont mind paying for delivery/postage.  Would consider a good imaging scope or setup too.
       
      Thanks.
       
      Pete
    • By astrosathya
      Recently I had belt modded my HEQ5-PRO and last night i gave it a full run and i was absolutely stunned to say the least about the guiding results I achieved. I was left wondering if its even too good to be true! 
      Below are Before and After images of guiding.


    • By Martin AB Cohen
      After trying and failing some time ago to find a video tutorial on how to strip-down my Skywatcher HEQ5 Pro mount, clean all the bearings and gears, re-grease them, and put it all back together again, I eventually learned how to do this from various other online resources and have now created my own video tutorial. For those of you with a Skywatcher HEQ5 or HEQ5 Pro mount, or indeed an Orion Sirius EQ-G mount (which is the same mechanically), this video can help you to keep you mount running smoothly through regular DIY servicing (~every 2 years).  I hope you find it useful.  Here is the link...
       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.