Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

Recommended Posts

I bought this second hand, but it was almost untouched, and a relative bargain to boot.  New it costs 1199 EUR from TS (approx. £1035 as of 08/03/2019 but who has any idea how this might fluctuate).

 

Highlights:

  • Apo air-spaced triplet with FPL53
  • Multiple focus positions thanks to removable tube segments
  • 2.5” rack and pinion focuser, rotatable, dual speed controls, 6kg payload, with printed scale
  • CNC tube rings and dovetail supplied
  • Retractable dew shield

 

First impressions:

It’s a really nice box.  Whilst it’s described as a ‘transport case’ the supplied storage box is sturdy and well made.  Inside, the foam fit is precise bordering on tight.  It’s actually mildly difficult to get the scope out of the box.  Things get a little easier if you loosen the tube rights slightly, allowing for some tube rotation, and a longer term fix will be some straps to aid lifting the scope out vertically.

The scope itself feels very well made, and is what I’m choosing to refer to as ‘reassuringly weighty’.  At just over 4kg (without diagonal, eyepiece, or finder) there are definitely lighter options available, but it’s hardly a heavyweight.  The finish is powered coat white, which looks and feels very nice.

The focuser is very smooth (compared to my SW ED80) and feels pleasingly solid.  I’m not going to be testing the stated 6kg payload any time soon, but I can easily believe it will be able to handle it.

The dew shield is held in  position with a single thumbscrew, and whilst it’s retractable credentials are clearly warranted, it only seems to extend a couple of centimetres.  As it happens, this takes the overall length down to 450mm which was the very top end of my acceptable range in order to meet my ‘travel’ requirement.  The focuser body also incorporates a finder shoe, but if you wanna  finder then you have to supply your own as there’s nothing included.

The idea of having additional tube segments is that you don’t have to rack out the focuser so far, and so improves stability.  This also allows for multiple reducer/flattener options for imaging use.  The TS website details the specific configurations using their recommended equipment which provide a faster f/4.9 option for sensors up to 36mm, or a full frame flat image at the standard f/6.6.  I might be exploring these options later, but for now, this is going to be for visual use.

 

First light:

OK - this barely counts, but I was impatient.  Predictably enough, first evening with a new telescope and it’s raining.  But I did manage a pretty decent look at my neighbours TV aerial and chimney stack.  They need some re-pointing.

The following evening (9th March 2019) was less rainy, but much the same for cloud, all but for about 30 minutes of relatively clear sky, interrupted regularly by patchy cloud.  So still not great.  However, my ambitious setup to allow for cooling paid off and I did manage a few minutes of actual use with a SW 28mm eyepiece.  The Baader Zoom I also treated myself to for my travel use is frustratingly still not dispatched.  And when I say set-up, I mean just carrying everything outside.  I’m using this on the SW AZ-Gti mount, and a Manfrotto tripod I had already, so it’s very easy to pick up and take outside.

I was using the scope with one of the two removable sections in place (this is how it is stored in the supplied case) and was able to achieve focus with a 2" diagonal without having to rack out excessively.

Sirius was an obvious target to the south, and an easy hit.  Brilliantly bright, as expected, and a blue-ish white colour.   The upper half (the rest was below my sightline from home) of Canis Major was easy to see, with several of the background stars also visible.  Despite the less than great seeing, the view was impressive.  Stars were tight and there was no obvious chromatic aberration.   Moving up to Betelgeuse, it’s orange-red brilliance was very pleasing, and again I was able to make out some of the fainter surrounding stars.

Overall the view was very impressive, and bright.  My only real comparison is with my SW80, and of course I now have over 25% more light, so that’s to be expected.  But still, it makes an obvious difference.  I wasn’t able to note any CA or distortion, and a quick full visible spectrum (no filters) star test reflected spot on collimation and no apparent astigmatism.

Alas, the break in the patchy clouds did not last long, and I was soon packing up for the night and heading out for a beer.  I’m looking forward to getting some more quality time with this kit, and who knows, I might even align the AZ-Gti next time and write a brief review for that too.

258703090_1(1).thumb.jpg.fefb83f7cf14e597c35b7a2422300b48.jpg2.thumb.jpg.7e6f267a42f7bf2ac322fab4cf810a6b.jpg

TS-Optics Photoline 90mm F6.6 specs.png

  • Like 10

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a bonney looking refractor Justin. It doesn't really matter that it clouded over, as you can just sit looking at the scope and imagine what fun youre going to have together. :icon_cyclops_ani:

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, mikeDnight said:

That's a bonney looking refractor Justin. It doesn't really matter that it clouded over, as you can just sit looking at the scope and imagine what fun youre going to have together. :icon_cyclops_ani:

As enjoyable as that may be, I'd rather be outside ;) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@jadcx

Great looking scope - the 2cm dewshield extension does not sound much but how much depth does this give to the front of the optics ?

Edited by dweller25

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, jadcx said:

 

The idea of having additional tube segments is that you don’t have to rack out the focuser so far, and so improves stability.  This also allows for multiple reducer/flattener options for imaging use.  The TS website details the specific configurations using their recommended equipment which provide a faster f/4.9 option for sensors up to 36mm, or a full frame flat image at the standard f/6.6.  I might be exploring these options later, but for now, this is going to be for visual use.

 

 

The focuser looks similar to the Explore Scientific 2.5 in Hex Focuser, which has just 45 mm of travel.

John

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, dweller25 said:

@jadcx

Great looking scope - the 2cm dewshield extension does not sound much but how much depth does this give to the front of the optics ?

There is approx. 23mm from the front of the lens to the end of the tube (with the printed text in picture), and fully extended the dew shield adds a further 36mm.  And wow it looks dusty!

 

90mm front - 1.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, johnturley said:

The focuser looks similar to the Explore Scientific 2.5 in Hex Focuser, which has just 45 mm of travel.

John

I don't know about the ES comparison, but with this you get 80mm travel.  I achieved focus with one tube segment and a diagonal at approx. 51mm.

 

focuser - 1.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, I see from the photo that its quite a bit different with a much more adequate 80 mm of travel, the first photo gave the impression of a hexagonal shape, but it looks like that it was just an effect of the light.

John

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, johnturley said:

No, I see from the photo that its quite a bit different with a much more adequate 80 mm of travel, the first photo gave the impression of a hexagonal shape, but it looks like that it was just an effect of the light.

John

Yes it's definitely cylindrical.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice scope @jadcx!

I nearly bought it on two occasions so you saved me from myself! Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Stu said:

Nice scope @jadcx!

I nearly bought it on two occasions so you saved me from myself! Thanks!

So third time lucky, right? :)

You know you want to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, jadcx said:

So third time lucky, right? :)

You know you want to.

Maybe so. It was a very good deal so you did well. I suspect will end up with one at some point though, specifically for travelling.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, jadcx said:

There is approx. 23mm from the front of the lens to the end of the tube (with the printed text in picture), and fully extended the dew shield adds a further 36mm.  And wow it looks dusty!

 

90mm front - 1.jpg

Thanks for the info ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lovely looking scope - I considered it as well before realising that because I already have 80mm and 100mm refractors, perhaps a new 90mm refractor wasn't the most imaginative way forward. Triplet, good for imaging and visual, and I presume aircraft cabin friendly - it's the perfect travel scope.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Highburymark said:

Lovely looking scope - I considered it as well before realising that because I already have 80mm and 100mm refractors, perhaps a new 90mm refractor wasn't the most imaginative way forward. Triplet, good for imaging and visual, and I presume aircraft cabin friendly - it's the perfect travel scope.

Yes, it’s all of the above :)  and whilst I do have an 80mm I’ve justified it because of its travel credentials and “the other one is set up for imaging” which is apparently a believable reason.

Edited by jadcx
Spelling

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, jadcx said:

Yes, it’s all of the above :)  and whilst I do ha e an 80mm I’ve justified it because of its travel credentials and “the other one is set up for imaging” which is apparently a believable reason.

Excellent reasons! Fully justified. Though looking at the pictures you don't need to justify it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By MrGuGuZai
      Skywatcher skymax 90mm mak or Skywatcher evostar 90mm.

      which one is better for planetary?
    • By jackrussell0232
      Who knew renovating a house could take so long - and it's still a long way from being finished (maybe I shouldn't have tried to tackle it all myself...)
      But having finally uncovered some of the boxes containing my kit, and with a bit more free time than normal, I decided to have another go, starting with one of the top targets this time of year. (I am working from home, honestly).
      I felt like I was learning again from scratch.  But at least I've discovered the masked stretch.  This image might be over-saturated for some tastes, but what can I say, it's the first time I've managed to get any colour in my
      stars! 🙂
      20x10 mins L
      10x300s RGB
      Altair Astro Wave 115 refractor, SBIG STF8300M, GM1000HPS (never managed to get it to track unguided, but at least it can be guided now)

    • By JonCarleton
      It figures!  First clear night in ages and the pollen is as thick as..well, something really thick.  Up to now, I have been fairly careful to avoid dust getting down the tube, but pollen is going to be unavoidable for the next several weeks.
      So...what does one do?  Are there some do and don't things I should be aware of?  It looks like my mirror comes out fairly easy (SkyWatcher 10" ).  I'm guessing  "chuck into the dish washer on the pot scrubber setting" is probably a really bad idea.
      What then, is the plan?  What chemicals/detergents should be used...or maybe all chemicals should be avoided?  Is it a no-touch surface?  Is there perhaps some magic spray that one uses?  I do have a can of electronics air that I plan to use from a safe distance to persuade away loose pollen, and that may be enough for the present.
       
    • By MrGuGuZai
      Hi, want to get a new telescope, SkyWatcher Evostar 90 EQ2 or SkyWatcher heritage 130p? i saw many suggested refractor is good for planets, i mostly target planets, moon and some star only, live in city.  need some advice. thanks. 
    • By MrGuGuZai
      Hi, i have a Celestron ExploraScope 70AZ,  when i look at the saturn or jupiter (low or high magnification) the picture is clear if the object is at middle of my viewing but blurry and color mismatch if the object is at left side of the viewing.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.