Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_dslr_mirrorlesss_winners.thumb.jpg.9deb4a8db27e7485a7bb99d98667c94e.jpg

Recommended Posts

Had a quick search but not found much info, I've just 'transitioned' from DSLR to a CMOS (AA 183C pro)

Used to capture with APT or Backyard Nikon, save as RAW, DSS to stack and use autosave.tif to work on in Photoshop. Whats the general consensus on CMOS ?

So far trying APT or Sharpcap, saving as FITS, stacking in DSS still and using autosave.tif into Photoshop. I keep seeing fits liberator mentioned ?

Opinions gratefully received.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That is pretty much it.

I would probably use different software for different tasks - like SGP for acquisition, my own mumbo jumbo for stacking, and Gimp for processing, but work flow is pretty much the same.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, so I guess I'm going to have to learn processing in a different way, this is about 60 mins of 15 seconds and 20 mins of 45 seconds but only stacked approx 60 % as SAM wasn't up to the weight / length of SW 72 ED (was just a test !)

Saved as FITs, stacked in DSS, Autosave.tif into PS6, convert to 16 bit, convert to RGB, levels in RGB several times, curves several times ... Just what I do to Nikon files (except save as NEF)

Where has all the colour gone ?

This is with a nice stretched histogram, slightly biased to the left and saturation turned up several times .

Slight crop to remove stacking edges and raised approx 60% to save SGL bandwidth.

M42-23-2-19.png

Edited by knobby
Typo ...autostakkert instead of autosave

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Next to per channel background, tick box says debloom, I'm stacking again using recommended settings, one of which is per channel background, just have to wait 4 hours now ...

Thanks again for your help Vlaiv

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

'sad face' same result, image is rgb but can't get any real colour showing ...

used black point 31 and gain at 400 in APT

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

edit, just tried these settings, found on Cloudy nights, 

Only stacked 20 x 15 seconds and 5 darks as test but with some seriously aggressive / quick levels / curves in PS6 got some colour !

image.thumb.png.25cec5a4501a33fc830768ae7c5358b5.png

M42.png

Edited by knobby
Added pictures
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe it's my sense of humour but the title of the thread amused me:  transition from DSLR to CMOS. 

Since the DSLR is a CMOS, you have successfully transitioned from CMOS to CMOS ? 

Mark

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just noticed your reply Mark ! Note to self , must pay more attention to thread titling ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 27/02/2019 at 01:13, sharkmelley said:

Maybe it's my sense of humour but the title of the thread amused me:  transition from DSLR to CMOS. 

Since the DSLR is a CMOS, you have successfully transitioned from CMOS to CMOS ? 

Mark

Was thinking the same mark but didn't want to get shot down

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 24/02/2019 at 15:25, knobby said:

Where has all the colour gone ?

This, my friend, is what I wonder too after each Stack of my Canon 600d with DSS, even with "per channel bkgd calibration", as @vlaiv correctly suggest. 

DSS just desaturates the images so much, that to pull colour out again I have to boost saturation and noise steps back in. Don't know if I'm missing something. 

Edited by FaDG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, newbie alert said:

Was thinking the same mark but didn't want to get shot down

It's really fine, I have a sense of humour ?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, FaDG said:

DSS just desaturates the images so much, that to pull colour out again I have to boost saturation and noise steps back in. Don't know if I'm missing something. 

I found the same with DSS so i switched to Astro pixel processor which i find great. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Allinthehead said:

I found the same with DSS so i switched to Astro pixel processor which i find great. 

I'll try that. I have a few images that didn't satisfy me, as I have the impression to see more signal in the raws than in the Stack. 

Edited by FaDG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, FaDG said:

I'll try that. I have a few images that didn't satisfy me, as I have the impression to see more signal in the raws than in the Stack. 

There's a trial version so well worth giving it a go. Make sure you select your bayer pattern and force cfa in raw/fits files before pressing integrate. Also try Sara Wagers website for some simple to follow tutorials.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By astrosathya
      Just thought i'll bring this up as a point of discussion. Today, cooled CMOS Astro Cameras are available in plenty. QHY, ZWO and other variants of the same camera are selling for very reasonable prices. However, there was a point of time when astrophotographers used to cool down their DSLR's as a cheap OSC alternative to CCD cameras. Give a choice, I would've purchased a dedicated CMOS OSC which can cool to 40 C below ambient, but since I had a Canon 500D which I had self modded, I requested a friend Kaustav Chatterjee (an avid model railroader) to cold mod my 500D (he had cold modded his 1000D long back). This newly modded camera has a TEC12703 single peltier and cools to approximately 20 below ambient.What do you guys think?




    • By lux eterna
      Hi all,
      This is 6 hours (30 x 12 min), taken with my modded Nikon D7000 @iso200 and Astronomik 12 nm Ha 2" filter on Meade LX200-ACF with reducer (=1600 mm FL @ F8). Guided with NexGuide on HEQ5 Pro.
      The plan was to do a Ha O3 bicolour on this target, but the O3 may be a future thing due to weather conditions.
      I usually remove the stars during part of my processing workflow and put them back later on, but this time I think the nebulosity and dust came out best without them. I did however try to find out which stars belong to Melotte 15 and include only those, just to portrait the Melotte 15 without anything between it and us, but I could not find that info.
      Processed with DSS, Starnet and PS.
      Ragnar

    • By LuminousCRO
      I was looking to get into astrophotography with my 10 inch dobson and for start would like to buy something affordable. Cameras can be used or new. Thanks in advance!
    • By masjstovel
      Hi,
      I bought my first telescope, SW 150pds about 6 months ago with the purpose of astroimaging "when i feel ready".  So far ive used my Nikon D810 for that, and I'm now  planning on taking the step buying my first AP camera.
      My targets would be DSO's, and not planetary. I want a mono-camera, not color. 

      I want to get away with a very good camera to a reasonable price (wouldn't we all...) and in this regard I've been drooling on the ZWO ASI 1600MM Mono for some time. The price for it is in the upper part of my budget, but I'm willing to if its worth it.  I've seen from other treads that sensor-size isn't everything, and dynamic range and gain and all is just as important, but i have trouble understanding it all 100% when it's all new to me, but in my experience i am a practical person who learns things much better and faster with the gear in my hand. So without getting to technical, and staying as objective as possible - please help me with; 

      1. Is this a good camera to go for?
      2. It's sold with options of filters 1.25", 31mm or 36mm - Why these options, and what determines what i would choose?

      3. Would you go for another camera in this price range, and why? - Or to rephrase it a bit; If you were in my shoes, which camera would you og for?

      I'd appreciate any help:)

      I might add, that i understand that with my lack of experience, buying a mono-camera with filters and all might seem premature, but for some strange reason. I enjoy these "way over my head"-projects and figuring  out things as time goes - I just need some guiding in the right direction. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.