Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

parallaxerr

TS Optics 102ED FPL51 - Any info/reviews/users?

Recommended Posts

Hi grjsk,

No, the alignment of the screws is not a problem, functionally. It just bugged me given the other issues I was having. If your focuser is OK then I'm sure the scope will perform fine!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, parallaxerr said:

Hi grjsk,

No, the alignment of the screws is not a problem, functionally. It just bugged me given the other issues I was having. If your focuser is OK then I'm sure the scope will perform fine!

Thanks alot, that was the answer I was hoping for!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 17/02/2019 at 15:07, mikeDnight said:

Hi Jon,

Most of my observing is lunar and planetary, mostly because my site tends to be misty and not because I have no interest in dso's. Obviously, even if my site had really dark skies, a 4" scope will have limits with regard to light grasp. However, I've found by blocking out stray light from entering my eye from surrounding light sources by using a dark hood or blanket over my head and eyepiece,  I can attain a really good level of dark adaption. Rather than rushing from one dso to the next, I will spend some time observing each, even upto an hour depending on the intricacy or difficulty of the target. I think you'll find the 102ED to be a surprisingly good fuzzy finder. TeleVue designed one of the world's most popular 4" refractors as a visual rich field/deep sky scope, so if they ere not very good on dso targets, I think TeleVue would have dropped them decades ago.

I've attached a few dso sketches made from home on the outskirts of Burnley on the Lanc's/York's border. All sketches were made using a 100mm F7.4 apo. 

2130794176_2019-02-1714_46_26.thumb.jpg.9efb96d8bf6d1c060d8aeb3d9d034705.jpg M82 

1183021051_2019-02-1714_44_36.thumb.jpg.51772a34362cee3941dcbfd766ebcbd3.jpg M33

1468958421_2019-02-1714_43_40.thumb.jpg.e2c553fbdcacf2490aa3ac910a558db9.jpg M97

1405080950_2019-02-1714_41_42.thumb.jpg.f536f2d7a96df6fee4d933cafdf52187.jpg M78

139519066_2019-02-1714_42_36.thumb.jpg.c7f873016e81f6544f2be9913e6b2eb5.jpg M42 

646146244_2017-07-1819_16_53.jpg.f8ca41786a61849a88e814bb8df5c71b.jpg M57 

1952923925_2017-07-1709_13_23.jpg.1b4937fa0f94c33a295227b0c22d5b77.jpg M27 

IMG_20160205_175527.JPG.8141fecf4ac4948e3e44ea9d7fe36d7a.thumb.JPG.df235ded44e4ab302812da1d85e00f92.JPGM45 

 

Found them, nice sketches Mike.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Martin13 said:

Found them, nice sketches Mike.

I'm glad you found what you wanted Martin. I wasn't sure which thread you were looking for so I sent you a selection of sketches, in the hope I'd include the right ones. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 22/02/2020 at 08:42, mikeDnight said:

I'm glad you found what you wanted Martin. I wasn't sure which thread you were looking for so I sent you a selection of sketches, in the hope I'd include the right ones. 

Very impressive Mike, certainly convinced my wife that it is a worthwhile investment. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.