Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Urgent pier height help


Anthonyexmouth

Recommended Posts

Just now, adyj1 said:

Well, I think we can safely say it isn't going to fall over ? 

Looking good 

i'm thinking its gotta be at least 10% more stable than the tripod. 

next plan is to make a cage around the lower studs and make knockouts for power distribution (240v,12v and usb power sockets), plate mounted usb hub and cat6 faceplate. that will enclose the bottom section and seal it, then i'll drill a 40mm hole in the center of the plate and mount a 12v case fan, that will draw air up through the conduit and into the space when the cover is on, this will run all the time the mount and scope are covered. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Anthonyexmouth said:

i'm thinking its gotta be at least 10% more stable than the tripod. 

next plan is to make a cage around the lower studs and make knockouts for power distribution (240v,12v and usb power sockets), plate mounted usb hub and cat6 faceplate. that will enclose the bottom section and seal it, then i'll drill a 40mm hole in the center of the plate and mount a 12v case fan, that will draw air up through the conduit and into the space when the cover is on, this will run all the time the mount and scope are covered. 

I've stayed in hotel rooms that haven't been that well equipped ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good to see it coming together :)

Looking at the design of the studding, I can't help wonder why you chose to have a separate plate between the pier and the mount adapter. I think you could have embedded the studding from the adapter straight into the concrete, without the need to have a plate and 4 extra lengths of studding. This is basically the design I used for mine. I bent the conduit in the pier through 90' to bring the opening to the side of the pier instead of on the top.

I realise this is a bit late to suggest this now (!). I'm just curious why you chose to do it this way?  I'm sure your design will work fine, it just seems a lot of extra effort!

IMG_5439.jpg

Edited by Astrokev
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Astrokev said:

Good to see it coming together :)

Looking at the design of the studding, I can't help wonder why you chose to have a separate plate between the pier and the mount adapter. I think you could have embedded the studding from the adapter straight into the concrete, without the need to have a plate and 4 extra lengths of studding. This is basically the design I used for mine. I bent the conduit in the pier through 90' to bring the opening to the side of the pier instead of on the top.

I realise this is a bit late to suggest this now (!). I'm just curious why you chose to do it this way?  I'm sure your design will work fine, it just seems a lot of extra effort!

future proofing really, i thought if i have a base with 4* 16mm studs and a sacrificial plate that can then be swapped if i ever change mounts. if i had done the studs to the mount adapter directly then id have been stuck with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Astrokev said:

Good to see it coming together :)

Looking at the design of the studding, I can't help wonder why you chose to have a separate plate between the pier and the mount adapter. I think you could have embedded the studding from the adapter straight into the concrete, without the need to have a plate and 4 extra lengths of studding. This is basically the design I used for mine. I bent the conduit in the pier through 90' to bring the opening to the side of the pier instead of on the top.

I realise this is a bit late to suggest this now (!). I'm just curious why you chose to do it this way?  I'm sure your design will work fine, it just seems a lot of extra effort!

IMG_5439.jpg

looking at yours, the only difference to mine is i have raised the adapter above the plate for a bit more height. not totally decided on height yet but when i do i'll cut a length of pipe to clamp between the mount and bottom plate for extra stiffness so im not relying on the 3 16mm threaded rods

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Anthonyexmouth said:

future proofing really, i thought if i have a base with 4* 16mm studs and a sacrificial plate that can then be swapped if i ever change mounts. if i had done the studs to the mount adapter directly then id have been stuck with that.

Yep, that's fair I s'pose ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Anthonyexmouth said:

looking at yours, the only difference to mine is i have raised the adapter above the plate for a bit more height. not totally decided on height yet but when i do i'll cut a length of pipe to clamp between the mount and bottom plate for extra stiffness so im not relying on the 3 16mm threaded rods

Yes, that's a good idea. The 3 adapter rods being fixed to the bottom plate with only a single nut on each side is, theoretically at least, a potential point of flex. In practice it may be fine, but if it were me, I would add something to stiffen this up as you suggest.

For my pier I designed the height so that the adapter plate was as close as possible to the top of the pier. The factors affecting the pier height were the desired height of the eyepiece, and the height of the walls to ensure the roof would close without fouling the scope. The only reason there's a gap is to access the bolt holding the mount to the adapter plate, to help with azimuth adjustment. In the unlikely event that I upgrade my mount, I can simply either replace the plate or drill extra holes in it to fit the requirements of any new adapter or mount head. That's the theory anyway ?

Edited by Astrokev
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Finally got around to cutting the pipe to go between the plate and the mount. just waiting for the wind to stop so i can go and fit it. this should substantially stiffen the setup, not that it really need it. next project is a steel square box to go under the plate to house all the connections. this will be usb power outlets, 240v socket, network and various 12v sockets and an 8v one .

20190316_093604.thumb.jpg.5054e850c6fc865fbc7128e0fa4ba4c7.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

In my opinion it's a pretty big engineering fail to make such a sturdy concrete pier and have long extensions of threaded rod, it can create unwanted vibrations when guiding and during windy conditions.
The pier is nice thou and smart with the through pier cabling, also the "camouflage" is a good idea :) 

Edited by Xplode
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Xplode said:

In my opinion it's a pretty big engineering fail to make such a sturdy concrete pier and have long extensions of threaded rod, it can create unwanted vibrations when guiding and during windy conditions.
The pier is nice thou and smart with the through pier cabling, also the "camouflage" is a good idea :) 

If you look back a few posts you'll see that there is a 4mm steel tube that's going between the mount and the plate. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Anthonyexmouth said:

If you look back a few posts you'll see that there is a 4mm steel tube that's going between the mount and the plate. 

How d'you plan to attach the steel tube to the plate?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.