Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

stargazine_ep3_banner.thumb.jpg.5533fb830ae914798f4dbbdd2c8a5853.jpg

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone, just looking to get into astrophotography but looking at a DSLR as I'd like to use it for daytime use too, I know usually it's better for them to be modified but I've seen this can be done to allow use for both with only white balance adjustment. 

I've seen 1300d's going around £200 on eBay with the 18-55mm lens but the 4000d is a couple of years newer and there is currently one with 18-55mm + 75-300mm going for £350 at Currys. From what I can work out there isn't much difference between them besides a smaller screen on the 4000d and the release date. I'm just wondering if there is some reason people go for the 1300d instead or is it just because of it being older it turns up cheaper?

Sorry for the long winded post but I'm doing lots of research to make sure I get the best one that'll last me the longest, thanks for any help.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, if also looking at second hand then the 600d is better as it has a useful articulated screen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I'm not sure but I think the 4000 may not / doesn't have an AC connection (better than battery for long exposure astrophotography), although a case could be made for astronomizing it (battery as AC source w/ a cigarette socket). I went for a 2000 after "repairing" my 1000.

- Andy -

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a 600d on E Bay with only 3000 shutter count for £185. Get the camera with the highest DIGIC that you can.

Peter

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I too would look at the 600D/650D/700D range of cameras they are all a significant step up from the 1300D or 4000D, have a look at the used prices on MPB Photographic (I buy quite a few lenses from them).

https://www.mpb.com/en-uk/used-equipment/used-photo-and-video/used-digital-slr-cameras/used-canon-digital-slr-cameras/canon-eos-600d/

Alan

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the advice, it's gave me a whole new avenue of cameras to explore, the prices of them on mpb.com don't look to bad but am I right in thinking they only sell the body and no lenses with them?

EDIT: Just had a look and it seems they do some of the basic lenses for around £40 so I guess that's not too bad then.

Edited by Pullock

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, Pullock said:

Thanks for all the advice, it's gave me a whole new avenue of cameras to explore, the prices of them on mpb.com don't look to bad but am I right in thinking they only sell the body and no lenses with them?

EDIT: Just had a look and it seems they do some of the basic lenses for around £40 so I guess that's not too bad then.

The prices on MPB and Wex Photographic are only a bit more than you pay on E-bay but they are usually very accurate with their descriptions and being big companies have a better returns policy if things go wrong..

Alan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Alien 13 said:

The prices on MPB and Wex Photographic are only a bit more than you pay on E-bay but they are usually very accurate with their descriptions and being big companies have a better returns policy if things go wrong..

Alan

That's good to know, thanks. Having that piece of mind if something goes wrong is helpful, some of the ones I'm looking at on MPB are actually cheaper than eBay, who'd have thought?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had the same dilemma a couple of weeks ago. I checked the 4000d side by side with a used 600d.

The screen resolution of the 4000d is much lower. It looks and feels cheaply made compared to the 600d. The lens mount is plastic on the 4000d, this might be ok with the kit lens mounted forever on, but not so good if you swap the lens with the telescope or a larger lens all the time. The wifi feature is pretty nice but on the other hand the 4000d comes with a digic4+ processor instead of the digic4 which should be a bit better but not yet cracked by the Magic Lantern guys.

Although similarly priced, I went for the 5000 clicks used 600d. Mpb.com is good place to look. Hope I helped.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, R26 oldtimer said:

I had the same dilemma a couple of weeks ago. I checked the 4000d side by side with a used 600d.

The screen resolution of the 4000d is much lower. It looks and feels cheaply made compared to the 600d. The lens mount is plastic on the 4000d, this might be ok with the kit lens mounted forever on, but not so good if you swap the lens with the telescope or a larger lens all the time. The wifi feature is pretty nice but on the other hand the 4000d comes with a digic4+ processor instead of the digic4 which should be a bit better but not yet cracked by the Magic Lantern guys.

Although similarly priced, I went for the 5000 clicks used 600d. Mpb.com is good place to look. Hope I helped.

Thanks that helps a lot, a plastic lens mount really knocks my confidence in it, I'm leaning towards a 700D at the moment, there's just so much choice!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On MPB at the moments, there are a number of 60D's, which are the bigger brother to the 600D's (of which I have two), at some very tempting prices.

FYI, Canon's off the shelf Astro camera, the 60DA, i.e. a 60D with IR Filter already removed....

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice everyone, I pulled the trigger on a 700D in 'Excellent' condition, it honestly looks brand new to me and I'm very pleased with it. I also got a Tamron 70-300mm lens which was primarily for attempts at shooting planes with it, however that will turn out anyway. It certainly isn't a good lens for around the house but I may pick up a standard kit lens in the near future. For now I just need to wait for my T-ring adapter to arrive to use with my telescopes but the forecast is looking quite promising later tonight (On the same day I got a new piece of equipment, I think this is unheard of?!) So I think I may set it up on my tripod and see what happens just to get familiar with things, I'm not expecting much but I'm really excited and seeing this being another money pit. Thanks everyone, Clear Skies!

canon.thumb.jpg.7c26f5f3010421798eebc215af68336f.jpg

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That looks great, enjoy.

First thing to do is turn of in camera noise suppression on long exposure. It will be in the custom menus.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, happy-kat said:

That looks great, enjoy.

First thing to do is turn of in camera noise suppression on long exposure. It will be in the custom menus.

I was watching a video about settings and they also mentioned it as I read your post, Long exposure noise reduction is off, I guess that's correct?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice camera, I had a 650D for ages and it was a great piece of kit, if you go for the kit 18-55 mm lens in the future get the IS version or better still the STM one as they work better indoors but they are all surprisingly good for the money.

Alan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Alien 13 said:

Nice camera, I had a 650D for ages and it was a great piece of kit, if you go for the kit 18-55 mm lens in the future get the IS version or better still the STM one as they work better indoors but they are all surprisingly good for the money.

Alan

Thanks for that, I'm still yet to learn what all the different abbreviations are, appreciate it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By CowsonConcrete
      Hi,
      Here's a quick shot of last night's moon.
      I've broken the crayford on my SkyWatcher 130pds so had to hold the focuser tube to get it sharp. Not ideal but I'm pleased with the result. 
      Àny ideas how I can add more colour without affecting the detail?
      Thanks

    • By aditya10
      Hello!
      This is my first post on stargazer’s lounge, so forgive me if this is the wrong place to ask. 
      I have a SkyWatcher AZ-GTi mount (with a firmware update + eq wedge so that it can run in eq mode). I also have a Raspberry Pi 4 with INDI, KStars, and Ekos tools. I don’t have a guidescope (and my budget is extremely limited), so I was wondering if there was a way to polar align my DSLR using just the software running on the Raspberry Pi. 
      I’m also competent in Python, if that could be useful for anything. 
    • By Varavall
      I sell my refurbished Nikon 300mm AF-S VR f2,8G ED with Nikon warranty until September 2020. I am selling as my interests require different equipment. It is in excellent functional state, the tripod mount and the original Nikon hood have wear commensurate with normal use. This objective is excellent for wildlife photography, astrophotography and sports photography. Also included is a set of Gobe neutral density filters to enable long exposure in bright conditions. I would consider exchange, with monetary adjustment if necessary, for something for astronomy such as Takahashi telescopes and/or quality equatorial mount.
       
      Price £1900 (Current model available new for around £5500)







    • By trunting
      I've been having another crack at DSO imaging lately, and I've managed to produce this from 6 hours of integration: 
      I'm quite pleased with it but I'm very new to image processing, so I'd be incredibly grateful if someone wouldn't mind having a go at processing my data!

      Image Info:
      Lights: 46x4min + 66x3min  Stacked with Dark, Flat and Bias frames Stacked in DSS and processed in GIMP Taken under Bortle 7/8 skies Gear:
      SkyWatcher ED80 0.85x Reducer Astro-Modified EOS 600D ZWO ASI 120MM Mini Guide Camera with 9x50 Finderscope HEQ5 Pro Mount There's some dust bunnies and other artefacts on the image that I know I could spend more time removing, however I'm wondering if I'm doing my data justice in processing!
      Thanks, Tom
      NGC7023 (2).TIF
    • By Akmcf
      Hi guys! 🙂
      My name is Andrew, I only just stumbled across these forums just now! Couldn’t have come across a better community to help me with some questions I have!
       
      So I’ve Come to the conclusion that I’m going to be buying a Celestron Nexstar 6SE telescope everything about it appeals to me. I currently own a much older manual celestron telescope and am ready for my first proper telescope!
      I do plenty of photography and own a DSLR and am aware that with this telescope that it comes with a software that will record video of what you’re gazing at and stack the images if I’m correct?
      because I’m familiar with normal photography and not so much with Astro photography I was wondering if anyone could help me out. For the stocking software, is that all the process completed within the telescope and no DSLR? Or is that recorded with the DSL are and then the software stacks? What kind of adapters would I need to be getting into AP? By the way I’m looking at mainly photographing the moon and hopefully get some awesome shots of the other planets too! 😄 not so much deep AP, as from my research I’ve gathered that this isn’t the greatest for it... anyways.
       
      Is it better to use a DSLR and an adapter on the eyepiece for imaging? Or the stacking and what would I need for best result stacking images, especially of planets like Saturn and Jupiter?! Are the individual eyepiece attachments you buy for the telescope, cameras in themselves? What is aci?  I’ve got no clue! Haha a lot to learn!
       
      I thought I was on the right track looking by myself for equipment and I came across the 10MP celestron Neximage eyepiece or whatever it is? I’m not entirely sure? And also what is a T ring? Is that a Dslr adapter? Does the stacking software come with the telescope or with additional purchases?!
      Sorry for the bombardment of questions! Obviously I’m very excited to get going and am very keen on getting some equipment! Any answers are much appreciated!
      Have a great day!
       
      Andrew
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.