Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_celestial_motion.thumb.jpg.a9e9349c45f96ed7928eb32f1baf76ed.jpg

Recommended Posts

One of my favorite deep sky objects in the night sky, the great Andromeda galaxy.

All the processing has been done with Pixinsight. The scope was FSQ-85 with the good old unmodded Canon 6D. Around 5 hours of data with 5 minutes exposure.

Hope to add some short exposures to the core someday.

integration_FINAL_PROCCESSED.jpg

Edited by Stardust1
  • Like 28

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That’s gorgeous!   Nicely understated.

I like that it hasn’t been pimped by the addition of garish Ha star-forming regions.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...and taken with an unmodded Canon as well.   Very,very good.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Stardust1 said:

One of my favorite deep sky objects in the night sky, the great Andromeda galaxy.

All the processing has been done with Pixinsight. The scope was FSQ-85 with the good old unmodded Canon 6D. Around 5 hours of data with 5 minutes exposure.

Hope to add some short exposures to the core someday.

integration_FINAL_PROCCESSED.jpg

Excellent image of M31....Your image of M31 is certainly astronomy magazine material!

I've often wondered what size of scope would it take to image some of M31's star clusters? Obviously the Hubble can do quite easily, but what about an Earth-based telescope? >

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c4/Star_cluster_in_the_Andromeda_galaxy.jpg

Klitwo

Edited by Klitwo
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First class image, beautiful framing, and superb colour and detail.?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

lovely image! 

Is this with a standard FSQ85? No additional flattener?

I need to try this target with my (same) set-up. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, fireballxl5 said:

lovely image! 

Is this with a standard FSQ85? No additional flattener?

I need to try this target with my (same) set-up. 

Thank you! Yes, the image was taken with the standard FSQ85, without flattener.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent image.

16 hours ago, Stardust1 said:

Hope to add some short exposures to the core someday.

You may not need to. Is the core blown out in the individual subs? If it isn't, hdr processing will probably restore it quite nicely.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Wim!

The core is just a little blown out in the original subs. I might reprocess it in the future and see if I can salvage the core.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a lovely image! I've tried to capture M31 twice now and the results are poor! Turning into my nemesis I think!

 

Sorry to pixel peep but I'm curious as to what the artefacts on your bright stars are? They appear to run parallel to the centre of the image. I'm sure I've seen the same artefacts on another Tak image. I get 3 similar bright star 'spikes' on my WO but the orientation doesn't change. I understand it's to do with how the lens cell retains the glass but that doesn't explain the Tak spikes!

Screenshot_20190127-101451_Firefox.jpg

Screenshot_20190127-101529_Firefox.jpg

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, david_taurus83 said:

Sorry to pixel peep but I'm curious as to what the artefacts on your bright stars are?

That's diffraction. It means that something is interfering with the light as it goes through the scope. Lens and mirror clips are the most common causes.

Edited by wimvb
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, wimvb said:

Those are diffractions. It means that something is interfering with the light as it gies through the scope. Lens and mirror clips are the most common causes.

That's what I thought but why do they change orientation? The bright one above is on the left of the image so it runs top to bottom. But the not so bright on is running diagonally. Should it not be the same like Newtonian spikes?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, david_taurus83 said:

That's what I thought but why do they change orientation? The bright one above is on the left of the image so it runs top to bottom. But the not so bright on is running diagonally. Should it not be the same like Newtonian spikes?

Excellent point. I have no simple answer to this. The pattern changes orientation around the image, similar to a flattener spacing problem. Perhaps we're seeing a combination of diffraction and spacing.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, wimvb said:

Excellent point. I have no simple answer to this. The pattern changes orientation around the image, similar to a flattener spacing problem. Perhaps we're seeing a combination of diffraction and spacing.

This is a well known Tak effect and has affected the FSQ85 and pair of FSQ106Ns that I've used extensively. Greg Parker suggested slightly pinched optics. I don't think it has anything to do with lens clips. Compared with the stellar artefacts thrown up by such instruments as the Hubble I can honestly say that it hardly matters. ps54_5x7.png

I'm not knocking the Hubble image, I'm asking who cares about the stellar atrefacts when looking at this? Not I.

I think Stardust1 has a cracking Andromeda there, maybe just a little colour cold to my eye. I'd be inclined to warm it up a bit if it were mine but it isn't mine! 

I've spent quite a while messing about with the core on this target and short subs don't provide an easy fix. I found that utter brutality was the only way to drag the hints of spiral structure further into the core. I'm glad nobody was watching when I did it!

?lly

Edit: the FSQ scopes are flatfield Petzvals so they need neither flattener nor spacing unless the reducer is used. The reducer is not a flattener but does need correct spacing. WIthout it all you do is focus. Why do I like them???

 

Edited by ollypenrice
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, a very good M31.  Good focus and framing.

Like Olly I think the image would benefit from 'warming' the overall palette - the whole frame has an overall blue feel, perhaps due to the quite white core which has a warmer yellow tone.

These would be my suggestions for constructive feedback in an excellent M31 ?.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all for the kind words and comment! Really appreciate every feedback, as processing is a steep learning curve.

I will work on the colors and see if I can warm it up a little.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent image, excellent job.  

My only comment is that the sky background is rather dark and I wonder whether there is yet more galaxy nebulosity to be shown in the outer regions in a slightly less dark background.  

Carole 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nicely done, very natural looking  ( if there is such a thing ),

Taken with a un -modified camera as well,  you must be pleased.

well done

Paul

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Regarding the spikes that some of you have mentioned, it seems that some other optics do show this artifact as well. Here is an example of a Samyang 135mm F2 lens:

https://www.cloudynights.com/topic/547028-anyone-know-what-causes-this-artifact-on-bright-stars/

According to "Jerry Lodriguss", see above link, post#5, these artifacts are caused from aperture vignetting. It seems that the edge of the field doesn't see the full circle of the aperture. On post#13 of the above link you can see the simulation of the "almond" shaped aperture on star shape.

Edited by Stardust1
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, Stardust1 said:

According to "Jerry Lodriguss", see above link, post#5, these artifacts are caused from aperture vignetting

That makes sense.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Lead_weight
      My M31. Shot over 3 nights. Only 11 total hours. LRGB only with Astrodon filters, ZWO ASI1600MM-C camera, and the WO Redcat.

    • By ICR_2019
      Hi all
      I am one happy newbie.
      A short break in the cloud last night and I got my first hit on Andromeda.
      At first it was a small grey patch but with persistence and averted vision I got glimpses of  a bright central core with grey "cloud" extending out from each side.
      So my question from my LP back garden what might I be able to do to improve or at least get a more consistent visual.
      I have a skywatcher 130p the best views came with the supplied 20mm. 
      Would flocking and a dew shield help with contrast? A 25 or 32mm eyepiece clean up the image? Or maybe a colour filter to make it pop a little?
      I understand the limitations of both the scope  and viewing site both have a major effect but there must be steps I can take to get the best from what I have.
      Thanks in advance Ian 
       
    • By sammak127
      Here is a picture I took with my wife on holiday in France. It was a rare evening of stargazing after 3 year toddler hiatus. 
      We took it on a canon 6d with a 16mm wide angle sitting on the star adventurer.
      It’s  based on 3 exposures where I stacked the sky part whilst only using 1 layer for the foreground. Maybe 20 second exposures I can’t quite recall now. Then bumped up the levels also in photoshop. 

    • By Firas1
      Hi guys, I'm new here. 
      So i have heard from this source: 
      http://www.thescinewsreporter.com/2019/06/in-august-andromeda-galaxy-will-move.html?m=1
      that the galaxy andromeda will be visible to the naked eye and look bigger than the moon. They said that it will happen in August, but didn't specify a day. 
      Does anyone know anything about this? Or about how i kann see it? 
      Thanks in advance and sorry if my grammar is bad 
    • By Kronos831
      Hey.. So last night i went to a beach that had one side completely dark ,and the other filed with light pollution . In the dark side,the milky way gqlaxy was pretty obvious and the sky was  full of stars. Andromeda was rising and i wanted to take a peak, however , it was low on the horizon and had a slight haze(skyglow).It wasn't visible with the naked eye and in my 10x50 binoculars i could just resolve the core.
      I heard Andromeda would be visible with the naked eye as its mag 3.3. But the milkyway was and Andromeda wasnt.What went wrong?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.