Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_through_the-_eyepiece_winners.thumb.jpg.236833c5815bb321211a43f4d5214ba8.jpg

Recommended Posts

Yes, and it takes away from the detail, intensity and creates a strange hue across it.. my recommendation is a neodymium and contrast booster (in that order from the eyepiece out) to really enhance your views.... it is amazing just how much detail I picked up with my 8" SCT and 14" dob on the clearest nights with the use of those filters.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have used the TV Planetary Filter and it works very well, esp. on Jupiter, but not had chance to try it on Saturn as yet, I bought it after a guy from Australia was singing its praises, and have never regreted it, very expensive though at £140 now!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Occasionally over the years I've tried a whole range of different filters on the planets including UHC, OIII, H-B, coloured, neutral density, TV planetary etc, etc. I've not noticed gains over the unfiltered views (which I prefer) and mostly less detailed or more tinted views, so I don't bother now.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would second the Moon/Skyglow/Neodymium would add it is the number one filter I would suggest for Jupiter and Mars and of the many planetary filters I've tried it's the best performer for these objects, I bought a cheap brand and it worked so well I thought to upgrade but no improvement so now I have the Baader and the Orion and started with the Solomark. All three are great filters I won't split hairs and would say get one that fits your budget as there is not much difference amoung them. I do not use a contrast booster on reflectors for planets but will roll in a #8 yellow when using the MSG on my long focus achromat. 

To answer to op, I have of course like John thrown every filter I have at the planets UHC being one, the results were less than desirable with it.

Edited by SIDO

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The ones I've tried also included a Baader Neodymium but I didn't feel that it did anything for me either. With the exception of some nebulae and the Sun, I prefer to observe filterless generally but I can see that others have found some pleasing results from some filters though, so thats good :smiley:

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The nebula line filters are not helpful at all on planets.  I have used a Zhumell Moon & Skyglow filter on Jupiter, and maybe it shows better contrast, but the effect it has on the colors is quite odd.  I've found the lightest blue filter (80A) to be somewhat helpful on Jupiter.  I've found that I prefer astrophotographic, interference type color filters (red/green/blue) over the ordinary dyed types because they pass a much higher percentage of light.  Even then, I can't say I've ever seen anything new with them that I couldn't see without them.  Perhaps red on Mars helps bring out dark features better, but they're still there without the filter.

I have found the M&SG filter indispensible for comet hunting along a light polluted skyline.  Using sweeping with the filter in place confirmed by blinking with the filter (holding it briefly in front of the eyepiece), I've found several comets setting close in time with the sun that are otherwise invisible due to horizon murk.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm buying a filter set from Solomark. The quality looks excellent. There are these filters-

82A blue

23A red

21 Orange

12 Yellow

56 Green

Polarizing

And the Solomark Moon and Skyglow

TBH I wouldn't have thought of purchasing a filter set if I had not seen Jupiter through a yellow filter. Without it Jupiter was ok, with the bands looking good but till then I had never seen GRS. When I installed the filter, the rings had much more contrast and the GRS was clearly visible. I didn't even knew that GRS was visible at that time.

Can anyone advice me about these filters??

Clear nights

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't advise on those particular filters because I don't use them but there is some useful information here on what the various types of coloured filter might help with:

https://britastro.org/node/13609

 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Mezz
      Hi,
      I am going to buy my first telescope and I can't make up my mind with the focal ratio. I have seen this two option within my budget
      Skywatcher 130/1000 eq2 with a f/7.7 ratio
      Meade 130 Polaris EQ with 650 mm focal length and f/5 ratio.
      I read that a f/7.7 would be better to watch planets while f/5 would be better to watch galaxies and nebulae and will also give a brighter image.
       
      As I am new and never looked through a telescope like those I don't know which to choose. The idea of looking at galaxies really excited me but I also wanted to see planets such as Jupiter or Saturn and it's moons, and at the moment I am not considering photography as I still need to get familiar with the telescope but in the future I would love to take some photos so brightness could be important.
      My question is how much difference would I noticed between these two focal ratio when I looked at planets and galaxies. Would I get a much better view of Saturn with a f/7.7 or not really?
      Thanks in advance for your advices
    • By Kronos831
      Heyyy its meee kronos and i have been wondering about getting a filter...I really want the best contrast and brightness i can on my nebulas(i want to view M42 M57 M27 M31  M81 M82 and lots more) with my future 8" dob. Is this filter really going to help me?
      https://www.firstlightoptics.com/uhc-oiii-visual-filters/es_uhc_filter_125.html
      If it just a matter of quality of the filter itself  can you suggest a better one in the same price range?
      Or will not the uhc filter help me in general .IF so can you reccomend another one?
      Also is this         https://www.firstlightoptics.com/uhc-oiii-visual-filters/uhc-filter.html         this       https://www.firstlightoptics.com/uhc-oiii-visual-filters/es_uhc_filter_125.html        https://www.firstlightoptics.com/uhc-oiii-visual-filters/baader-uhc-s-filter.html               this better?
    • By Kronos831
      Heyyyyy its me againnn . I am trying to find a good UHC (Open to OIII ones aswell) filter to use for nebula observation. I ve stumbled upon these 2 : 
      1 Explore Scientific UHC Nebula Filter 
      https://www.firstlightoptics.com/uhc-oiii-visual-filters/explore-scientific-uhc-nebula-filter-1-25-2-inch.html
      2 UHC FILTER
      https://www.firstlightoptics.com/uhc-oiii-visual-filters/uhc-filter.html
      Can somebody tell me which is better? Or  if somebody has one themselves , can tell me if they are worth buying or just saving for a better one.
      If you want to you can recommend me a good UHC OR OIII filter for viewing Nebulas thanks.
      -Kronos
       
    • By sockgoblin
      SOLD Explorer Scientific  UHC Nebula Filter 1.25" with original box and certificate. £28 including postage.
       
    • By Starman
      Some reasonable seeing from my location in Selsey, West Sussex over the last couple of nights. Here are three results for Mars, Jupiter and Saturn from 26 June. 
      Pete



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.