Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_android_vs_ios_winners.thumb.jpg.803608cf7eedd5cfb31eedc3e3f357e9.jpg

chris_33

Celestron Edge HD 8 - Orion 10" Astrograph - Skywatcher 250/1200 PDS Explorer - purchase advice

Recommended Posts

Right now i am imaging with a Star Adventurer and a 300mm telelens on a dslr. 

I am planning to upgrade to the eq6-r pro and currently i am searching for a telescope. i want to take pictures of nebulae, galaxies and planets. 

My first idea was to get the Skywatcher 250/1200, then i read that it is too big for the eq6, i was recommended a shorter tube like the orion 10" at f/3.9 or a SCT, due to my budget i can't get higher than the edgeHD 8 unfortunately.

what would you recommend? i am also open for different suggestions, thank you :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi hi,

I am with SW 130PDS at the moment and also think of upgrading into something more expensive and EdgeHD is the first on my list:)

I think if you have enough funds fro Mount + EdgeHD, - go for it... EdgeHD is almost universal as it is native F10 which is minimum for galaxies, also it will be better with planets with or without barlow.

and with 0.7 reducer you may fit some nebulas in FOV.

Just keep in mind,

EdgeHD at F10 will need a very good guiding and NEQ6 R will have to work at his limits... Out of axis guiding will be handy... Not sure yet.. As I have not got my HD yet ;)

 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like Skywatcher 250/1200 OTA is around 14.5kg, I'm using an Orion 10" F3.9 Newtonian Astrograph + EQ6-R pro without any issue. its an 18kg/40lb setup with accessories and i can get 15min subs or more if needed and out of the box 0.6-0.7 arc second total RMS. EQ6-R pro can handle 20kg AP gear according to manual and user experience. here is my report on the setup if it helps. http://www.astronomyforum.net/astronomy-reports-forum/259561-guiding-eq6-r-pro-40lb-18kg-ap-gear.html

note that this setup ( and any large OTA regardless of the weight) will be very sensitive to the wind. Also both mount and OTA are heavy, not easy to handle/transport.

manual says payload : 20kg (for astrophotography)

wcnTOQ6.jpg

link to SGL EQ6-R pro owners club

setup is new so i haven't had the chance to get many images. this is the one i have completed so far. taken with D5300a DSLR

4ptOq5O.jpg

 

other reviews.

https://astrojolo.com/gears/sky-watcher-eq6-r-review/

https://www.darkframeoptics.com/blog/mount-performance-charts-1

Edited by tasheeya
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, chris_33 said:

get the Skywatcher 250/1200

Hi. That would be my choice. I'm using an old -blue-tube- 250p on a 13 year old EQ6, set up for galaxy season last year. Works great. 

Just my €0.02. HTH.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

RC scopes in 8 or 10" variants could be also something to check out.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, alacant said:

Hi. That would be my choice. I'm using an old -blue-tube- 250p on a 13 year old EQ6, set up for galaxy season last year. Works great. 

Just my €0.02. HTH.

do you have some kind of observatory? because i keep reading that this setup is sensitive to wind and i don't really have possibility to comletly shield it from it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, vlaiv said:

RC scopes in 8 or 10" variants could be also something to check out.

thank you, i will do that as well, do you know any specific scopes i should not miss?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, tasheeya said:

note that this setup ( and any large OTA regardless of the weight) will be very sensitive to the wind. Also both mount and OTA are heavy, not easy to handle/transport.

yeah, the wind thing is the only thing that concerns me about that combination.

short question, do you loose many subs due to star trails? because with my star adventurer i can only use like 40 to 60% of my subs, i just want to know what i can expect

really nice picture btw. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, chris_33 said:

yeah, the wind thing is the only thing that concerns me about that combination.

short question, do you loose many subs due to star trails? because with my star adventurer i can only use like 40 to 60% of my subs, i just want to know what i can expect

really nice picture btw. :)

these mounts are in entrirly different class than star adventurer mounts. you will not loose any subs due to tracking errors if you are guiding and there is no much wind. i took the above with occasional wind so the subs are limited to 5min. i had to remove 2 subs out of 38 due to strong wind bloating the stars.

thanks.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, chris_33 said:

yeah, the wind thing is the only thing that concerns me about that combination.

short question, do you loose many subs due to star trails? because with my star adventurer i can only use like 40 to 60% of my subs, i just want to know what i can expect

really nice picture btw. :)

if the wind is a big issue, you should consider a refractor than large Newtonian/RC or SCT tubes. they all will act like a sail in the wind.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, tasheeya said:

if the wind is a big issue, you should consider a refractor than large Newtonian/RC or SCT tubes. they all will act like a sail in the wind.

the thing is, i don't know how much wind is too much, and i can't really remember how much wind there was in the clear nights i was out, because it was never an issue 

i also don't know how much observatory tents do help or if i could build something myself, the transportation isn't really a problem after all

i just read through your report, looks really good, at least i know weight isn't an issue

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, chris_33 said:

do you have some kind of observatory?

Hi. No, but I do have a sw 130pds which I use if I feel that the wind is gonna be a factor. I've not found the wind too much of an issue though.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, chris_33 said:

the thing is, i don't know how much wind is too much, and i can't really remember how much wind there was in the clear nights i was out, because it was never an issue 

i also don't know how much observatory tents do help or if i could build something myself, the transportation isn't really a problem after all

i just read through your report, looks really good, at least i know weight isn't an issue

Issue with wind is not easy one to describe as it depends on various factors, and each setup will be different. Even two "identical" setups will behave differently in the wind for all but top class equipment where there is good QC and sample to sample variation is very small. Things to consider with wind:

Size and shape of the ota. General guideline - larger the ota - more susceptible to wind. Not all scopes are the same. Compact scopes have advantage over longer ones due to arm momentum (for same diameter and weight). Sometimes larger, heavier short OTA will have advantage over slim but long one (depends on length).

Next is sturdiness of clamping - you want very stiff clamping and you want your OTA to minimally flex on pressure (this is in part related to ota construction / materials used).

You also want to minimize backlash in drive train of mount. Backlash means play in each axis - and wind can "use" that small play to move OTA back/forth in both RA and DEC. Less backlash you have - the less impact of the wind.

Mount drive also needs rigidity. Some belt driven mounts have certain elasticity (acts in similar way to backlash) - wind can induce vibrations.

And finally - stability of mount / tripod combination as well as vibration suppression capability.

To put things in perspective, I'll give example of my current setup. I've got 8" RC on HEQ5 mount. Mount has been modded (belt mod/tuning, replaced dovetail clamp/saddle plate, replaced tripod for strong wooden Berlebach planet) and this is wind related performance on average in good seeing (just eyeballing it and from memory):

- completely still air - ~0.4" total RMS

- 1-2m/s breeze (one would not normally say that wind is blowing, but you can see leaves moving and cigarette smoke is not going straight up but at an angle) - 0.5" RMS

- 3-4m/s - you can hear wind in trees and feel slight breeze yourself - ~0.5 - 0.6" RMS

- 4-5m/s - stronger breeze and gusts - 0.6 - 0.8" RMS

- over 5m/s I usually don't bother with my setup.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, vlaiv said:

- completely still air - ~0.4" total RMS

- 1-2m/s breeze (one would not normally say that wind is blowing, but you can see leaves moving and cigarette smoke is not going straight up but at an angle) - 0.5" RMS

- 3-4m/s - you can hear wind in trees and feel slight breeze yourself - ~0.5 - 0.6" RMS

- 4-5m/s - stronger breeze and gusts - 0.6 - 0.8" RMS

- over 5m/s I usually don't bother with my setup.

finally someone giving me numbers, thank you very much

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, chris_33 said:

finally someone giving me numbers, thank you very much

Just keep in mind that those are "eyeballed" figures for my setup in my back yard (one could say I'm a bit shielded with house, fence and some garden growth, but I still feel when it's windy). Also, speed of wind is from forecast not actual measurement, but I guess it's fairly accurate - on multiple occasions changes in wind speed were forecast and guide graph responded accordingly, but it's always mix of seeing and other factors, so as they say, your mileage may vary.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, vlaiv said:

Just keep in mind that those are "eyeballed" figures for my setup in my back yard (one could say I'm a bit shielded with house, fence and some garden growth, but I still feel when it's windy). Also, speed of wind is from forecast not actual measurement, but I guess it's fairly accurate - on multiple occasions changes in wind speed were forecast and guide graph responded accordingly, but it's always mix of seeing and other factors, so as they say, your mileage may vary.

of course i get that, the thing is every person is different and when i read someone complaining that he doesn't get pinpoint stars because of the wind i don't know if he expects his setup to work with 30 m/s or if it was at 0.3 m/s, your numbers give me a feeling of what to expect, and that was very helpful

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Cosmic Geoff
      With reluctance I am looking to sell my 200mm aperture f5 Helios Newtonian OTA. (Helios is a brand that became incorporated into Skywatcher - this closely resembles Skywatcher OTAs)
      The Helios is offered with single speed rack & pinion focuser, tube rings, 22 to 1.25" adaptor, dovetail bar and grab handle for £90 o.n.o.  In good condition except that the dovetail bar appears to be discoloured by exposure to sunlight.
      I have not used the telescope for many months and with a persistent problem in my right arm my enthusiasm for moving heavy kit around has diminished.
      Buyer to collect from North Bucks.
      Offered as option with the OTA: EQ5 mount with RA drive + 6 volt sealed lead-acid battery +charger + standard and extra long Dec slow motion manual shafts. £150. Condition - used but working.
       
      If I sell the OTA I will be looking to dispose of its accessories:
      9x50 Skywatcher straight finder - in excellent condition except that the small plastic dust cap is missing.
      Cheshire collimator, boxed, as new.
      Helical fine focuser, range 10mm, ID 1.25", screws into 2"adapter.
      3x Datysun Barlow, as new, boxed.
      Widefield eyepiece, 22mm f.l., 30mm body (note not 1.25")  with built in focus, works well with this telescope.
      Plastic collimation cap (no cost).
      This bundle would cost around £114 new - offered if bought with scope at £75 o.n.o.
       
       





    • By floastro
      Hi guys,
      This is the first lights of my ASA 12"N f/3.62 (purchased in 2007) with my Moravian G4-16000 CCD camera using one KAF-16803 chip of 36mm x 36mm (4K x 4K).
      The adjustments, collimation, ASA OK3-Z pression screws, asked a lot of attention.
      For a precise collimation, i use the CATSEYE XL & XLKP kit.
      This is the first 3hrs of exposures taken the last weekend in one night. The second night was too windy unfortunately.
       

       
      Full Resolution image in 4K x 4K here :
      http://www.poigetdigitalpics.com/Fichiers_Divers/integration_NGC4438_DBE_3HDR_CompositeAplatie2_Spikes2-Modifier-Modifier-Modifier.jpg
       
      Full Resolution Annotated image here :
      http://www.poigetdigitalpics.com/Fichiers_Divers/NGC4438_new_image_Annotated.jpg
       
       
      All the information below :
       

       

       
       

       
      Enjoy !
      Florent ?
    • By astrosathya
      Hello Everyone,
      I have a GSO 6" f/4 Astrograph, and there's always been this issue with elongated stars on one edge. I've checked collimation and it is perfect, but for the elongation on one corner. Could someone please throw some light on what's happening

    • By anachristina
      Hi! I am very new to SGL (just signed up a couple of mins earlier) and to astronomy as well, though I have been facinated with celestial bodies since I can remember.  I recently purchased a Celestron Powerseeker 127EQ but now I’m having troubles using it and I can’t seem to see anything through it. I also have a Celestron collimating eyepiece but I still can’t seem to make it work. Anyone here who has experience with the same scope? Would appreciate if we could chat a bit as I would be really interested in your experience and how you ultimately made it work!
    • By astrosathya
      I recently tried imaging M7 with my 6" f/4 Newtonian. I had earlier commimated it with a Cheshire and Howie Glatter and was sure of the collimation. However, when I imaged using my DSLR with the coma corrector installed, I get focused stars off centre and not on the optical axis. Anyone experience anything similar before? What could this be? Tilt in the optical train? The focuser was drawn out only about 5mm to reach focus along with a 50mm extension tube. Any suggestion is welcome.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.