Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

stargazine_ep21_banner.thumb.jpg.d744e66b98367f1c5d57b7966c303f1b.jpg

chris_33

Celestron Edge HD 8 - Orion 10" Astrograph - Skywatcher 250/1200 PDS Explorer - purchase advice

Recommended Posts

Right now i am imaging with a Star Adventurer and a 300mm telelens on a dslr. 

I am planning to upgrade to the eq6-r pro and currently i am searching for a telescope. i want to take pictures of nebulae, galaxies and planets. 

My first idea was to get the Skywatcher 250/1200, then i read that it is too big for the eq6, i was recommended a shorter tube like the orion 10" at f/3.9 or a SCT, due to my budget i can't get higher than the edgeHD 8 unfortunately.

what would you recommend? i am also open for different suggestions, thank you :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi hi,

I am with SW 130PDS at the moment and also think of upgrading into something more expensive and EdgeHD is the first on my list:)

I think if you have enough funds fro Mount + EdgeHD, - go for it... EdgeHD is almost universal as it is native F10 which is minimum for galaxies, also it will be better with planets with or without barlow.

and with 0.7 reducer you may fit some nebulas in FOV.

Just keep in mind,

EdgeHD at F10 will need a very good guiding and NEQ6 R will have to work at his limits... Out of axis guiding will be handy... Not sure yet.. As I have not got my HD yet ;)

 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like Skywatcher 250/1200 OTA is around 14.5kg, I'm using an Orion 10" F3.9 Newtonian Astrograph + EQ6-R pro without any issue. its an 18kg/40lb setup with accessories and i can get 15min subs or more if needed and out of the box 0.6-0.7 arc second total RMS. EQ6-R pro can handle 20kg AP gear according to manual and user experience. here is my report on the setup if it helps. http://www.astronomyforum.net/astronomy-reports-forum/259561-guiding-eq6-r-pro-40lb-18kg-ap-gear.html

note that this setup ( and any large OTA regardless of the weight) will be very sensitive to the wind. Also both mount and OTA are heavy, not easy to handle/transport.

manual says payload : 20kg (for astrophotography)

wcnTOQ6.jpg

link to SGL EQ6-R pro owners club

setup is new so i haven't had the chance to get many images. this is the one i have completed so far. taken with D5300a DSLR

4ptOq5O.jpg

 

other reviews.

https://astrojolo.com/gears/sky-watcher-eq6-r-review/

https://www.darkframeoptics.com/blog/mount-performance-charts-1

Edited by tasheeya
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, chris_33 said:

get the Skywatcher 250/1200

Hi. That would be my choice. I'm using an old -blue-tube- 250p on a 13 year old EQ6, set up for galaxy season last year. Works great. 

Just my €0.02. HTH.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

RC scopes in 8 or 10" variants could be also something to check out.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, alacant said:

Hi. That would be my choice. I'm using an old -blue-tube- 250p on a 13 year old EQ6, set up for galaxy season last year. Works great. 

Just my €0.02. HTH.

do you have some kind of observatory? because i keep reading that this setup is sensitive to wind and i don't really have possibility to comletly shield it from it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, vlaiv said:

RC scopes in 8 or 10" variants could be also something to check out.

thank you, i will do that as well, do you know any specific scopes i should not miss?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, tasheeya said:

note that this setup ( and any large OTA regardless of the weight) will be very sensitive to the wind. Also both mount and OTA are heavy, not easy to handle/transport.

yeah, the wind thing is the only thing that concerns me about that combination.

short question, do you loose many subs due to star trails? because with my star adventurer i can only use like 40 to 60% of my subs, i just want to know what i can expect

really nice picture btw. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, chris_33 said:

yeah, the wind thing is the only thing that concerns me about that combination.

short question, do you loose many subs due to star trails? because with my star adventurer i can only use like 40 to 60% of my subs, i just want to know what i can expect

really nice picture btw. :)

these mounts are in entrirly different class than star adventurer mounts. you will not loose any subs due to tracking errors if you are guiding and there is no much wind. i took the above with occasional wind so the subs are limited to 5min. i had to remove 2 subs out of 38 due to strong wind bloating the stars.

thanks.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, chris_33 said:

yeah, the wind thing is the only thing that concerns me about that combination.

short question, do you loose many subs due to star trails? because with my star adventurer i can only use like 40 to 60% of my subs, i just want to know what i can expect

really nice picture btw. :)

if the wind is a big issue, you should consider a refractor than large Newtonian/RC or SCT tubes. they all will act like a sail in the wind.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, tasheeya said:

if the wind is a big issue, you should consider a refractor than large Newtonian/RC or SCT tubes. they all will act like a sail in the wind.

the thing is, i don't know how much wind is too much, and i can't really remember how much wind there was in the clear nights i was out, because it was never an issue 

i also don't know how much observatory tents do help or if i could build something myself, the transportation isn't really a problem after all

i just read through your report, looks really good, at least i know weight isn't an issue

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, chris_33 said:

do you have some kind of observatory?

Hi. No, but I do have a sw 130pds which I use if I feel that the wind is gonna be a factor. I've not found the wind too much of an issue though.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, chris_33 said:

the thing is, i don't know how much wind is too much, and i can't really remember how much wind there was in the clear nights i was out, because it was never an issue 

i also don't know how much observatory tents do help or if i could build something myself, the transportation isn't really a problem after all

i just read through your report, looks really good, at least i know weight isn't an issue

Issue with wind is not easy one to describe as it depends on various factors, and each setup will be different. Even two "identical" setups will behave differently in the wind for all but top class equipment where there is good QC and sample to sample variation is very small. Things to consider with wind:

Size and shape of the ota. General guideline - larger the ota - more susceptible to wind. Not all scopes are the same. Compact scopes have advantage over longer ones due to arm momentum (for same diameter and weight). Sometimes larger, heavier short OTA will have advantage over slim but long one (depends on length).

Next is sturdiness of clamping - you want very stiff clamping and you want your OTA to minimally flex on pressure (this is in part related to ota construction / materials used).

You also want to minimize backlash in drive train of mount. Backlash means play in each axis - and wind can "use" that small play to move OTA back/forth in both RA and DEC. Less backlash you have - the less impact of the wind.

Mount drive also needs rigidity. Some belt driven mounts have certain elasticity (acts in similar way to backlash) - wind can induce vibrations.

And finally - stability of mount / tripod combination as well as vibration suppression capability.

To put things in perspective, I'll give example of my current setup. I've got 8" RC on HEQ5 mount. Mount has been modded (belt mod/tuning, replaced dovetail clamp/saddle plate, replaced tripod for strong wooden Berlebach planet) and this is wind related performance on average in good seeing (just eyeballing it and from memory):

- completely still air - ~0.4" total RMS

- 1-2m/s breeze (one would not normally say that wind is blowing, but you can see leaves moving and cigarette smoke is not going straight up but at an angle) - 0.5" RMS

- 3-4m/s - you can hear wind in trees and feel slight breeze yourself - ~0.5 - 0.6" RMS

- 4-5m/s - stronger breeze and gusts - 0.6 - 0.8" RMS

- over 5m/s I usually don't bother with my setup.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, vlaiv said:

- completely still air - ~0.4" total RMS

- 1-2m/s breeze (one would not normally say that wind is blowing, but you can see leaves moving and cigarette smoke is not going straight up but at an angle) - 0.5" RMS

- 3-4m/s - you can hear wind in trees and feel slight breeze yourself - ~0.5 - 0.6" RMS

- 4-5m/s - stronger breeze and gusts - 0.6 - 0.8" RMS

- over 5m/s I usually don't bother with my setup.

finally someone giving me numbers, thank you very much

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, chris_33 said:

finally someone giving me numbers, thank you very much

Just keep in mind that those are "eyeballed" figures for my setup in my back yard (one could say I'm a bit shielded with house, fence and some garden growth, but I still feel when it's windy). Also, speed of wind is from forecast not actual measurement, but I guess it's fairly accurate - on multiple occasions changes in wind speed were forecast and guide graph responded accordingly, but it's always mix of seeing and other factors, so as they say, your mileage may vary.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, vlaiv said:

Just keep in mind that those are "eyeballed" figures for my setup in my back yard (one could say I'm a bit shielded with house, fence and some garden growth, but I still feel when it's windy). Also, speed of wind is from forecast not actual measurement, but I guess it's fairly accurate - on multiple occasions changes in wind speed were forecast and guide graph responded accordingly, but it's always mix of seeing and other factors, so as they say, your mileage may vary.

of course i get that, the thing is every person is different and when i read someone complaining that he doesn't get pinpoint stars because of the wind i don't know if he expects his setup to work with 30 m/s or if it was at 0.3 m/s, your numbers give me a feeling of what to expect, and that was very helpful

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By StarFiveSky
      Hi, I recently looked into telescope's & dso's again due to an interesting sight in the night sky 😉. 
      I wanted to get into telescope's etc... but my budget and other things got in the way. 
      This time there's no budget limit (that doesn't mean I'm bill Gates though).
      My main concern is size since I will carry the telescope with my bare hands (bag).
      I don't have a local astronomy club or telescope shop around so I don't know if an 8" Newtonian is too bulky/big. 
      Can someone post comparison pictures, if you have an 8" telescope (preferably newtonian, width and length)?
      Secondly I want to see dso's in the future (firstly beginner objects etc...) so the 8" is more adequate than the 6", but if an 8" is too big then I am okay with a 6" as long as it's much more portable. 
    • By adamgyenge
      Helios 8" Newtonian telescope OTA. Equivalent with Skywatcher Explorer 200P.
      Has some cosmetic markings, but otherwise in excellent condition.
      Included:
      - 1.25" and 2" eyepiece adapters
      - 9x50 finderscope
      - long Vixen style dovetail
      Price: £130 (negotiable)

      Celestron Astromaster Kit is available for £20 extra
      Mount not included.
      Pick up only in Oxford.






    • By Anthony RS
      Hello,
      Is anyone here using the TS Photon 6" F4 newtonian? I'm about to purchase it but I have some doubts and questions:
      1- Does it hold collimation well, at least in a single session?
      2- Is it impossible to balance in DEC due to its small dovetail or is it possible but harder?
      3- Is the focuser rigid enough or does it introduce tilt?
      4- Will collimating it be a nightmare?
      5- I'm really picky when it comes to coma, should I expect some coma on edges even while using the Skywatcher Aplanatic F4 CC?
      6- All in all, do you advice me to buy it or have some other option in the same price range.
      Cheers!
      Anthony
    • By Michele Scotti
      Hi everybody - I'm humbled that some of you are following the thread on the 800mm telescope. I thought it was worth starting a sub-topic specifically related to the mirror making.
      So as the works on the mount got halted by the lockdown we had some time to virtually meet-up and discuss the optics for this project.
       
      The onset was pretty straightforward with an 'if we are doing this we are making the mirror'. And that sorts out the make vs buy, I suppose.
      As of now, the only two things decided so far are the diameter -at 800mm- and the f/3.3 - of course we can accommodate some variance.
       
      Some aspects of the making are pretty unchartered territories for our club so I'd like to seek some good advice from anybody in terms of direct experience or rather point us at some resources/threads.
      Back-ground: to make it short, our senior member had three 500mm f/5 done years ago. He did of course faster optics up to f/3 among many other mirrors - I actually never asked him how many, uh! He has always worked with full tool and has no experience with slumped glass. Btw we do have some experience in slumping glass but -weirdly enough- not in machining.
       
      During our initial discussions we boiled the scenarios down to 3:
      float glass, 35/40mm thickness considering 15mm of sagitta. This is a thermal challenge with its big outward mass, it's going to make the machining more of a challenge and the stabilization time longer float glass, 25mm (which seems more of a commercially available), slumped. Trading the thermal challenge with the slumping borosilicate, 25mm, slumped. Tbh this is just a better version of the previous point at a cost that is not prohibitive  
      What are the sources of glass in Europe for thickness over the bog standard 25mm? 
       
      Disclaimer: this is surely an ambitious endeavor and by no means we are underestimating that. Not only the bigger diameter is a step-up; the fast optics is a challenge too. 
       
      To start with we have some questions about slumped glass. It looks like an attractive, modern approach to mirrors that exceed a given diameter. I think I saw already some threads specifically about the slumping itself - that's golden.
      However it's the grinding/finishing/parabolizing that is puzzling us. Are there specific techniques or is it the same as the flat back glass?
      Also, how do you support the mirror? Would a support that replicates the telescope mirror cage be appropriate - a 27-point in our case? Or is it a matter to build a concave support that holds the back of the mirror? How accurate/solid should that support be?
      Any experience out there??
       
      I reckon that's enough as a start - thanks everybody in advance for your contribution.
       
      Stay safe! Michele
    • By Monofoot
      Hi guys, firstly - sorry if this is posted in the wrong place. 
      I've just ordered a Canon 600D to start doing some astrophotography and it arrives tomorrow - I'm stoked. I've been wanting to get into astrophotography for a while now and I'm so happy to finally be pulling the trigger.
      The last item on my shopping list is a solid beginner telescope which would couple well with my Canon 600D. The research I've done is all pointing towards a newtonian reflector.
      My primary goal here is to take some pictures of stars and planets with the Canon 600D attached to the telescope. I've been looking at the Sky-Watcher 114/900 as it's relatively cheap, which I think is great for someone just starting off - but was wondering what your opinions were seeing as you've all been through this before. Do you have any other recommendations? I'd like to keep my budget up to £300, and that's stretching it really.
      Thanks for taking the time to help!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.