Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_globular_clusters_winners.thumb.jpg.13b743f39f721323cb5d76f07724c489.jpg

Recommended Posts

I need a a really accurate,easy to use collimating tool. I have a used laser collimator but it does not fit snugly in the focuser so I feel it’s not very accurate. The idea of collimating causes me some anxiety anyway, so accurate and easy is the key! Can any of you offer any suggestions to help me out?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you downloaded and followed literally the letter Astrobabys collimation guide?  She uses a Cheshire collimator and I did absolutely everything that was suggested, regardless of how odd it sounded and I got a perfectly collimated telescope.  I was having kittens at the thought of doing the job before I read hhe guide..  I have seen it written that a symmetrical turn of insulating tape can make the fit of collimators a bit tighter.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I only use a simple drainage pipe end cap with a hole in it as a collimation cap, plus a barlowed laser. With the cap, I center the secondary. Then I use the barlowed laser to align the primary. With the barlowed laser, laser collimation is less critical. So far, this has worked for me.

http://www.micosmos.com/enlaces/collimation_with_a_Barlowed_Laser.pdf

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheshire for me as well. Simple yet effective.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a Cheshire and it does the job perfectly.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

NOOOOOOOOOOO!!! you've discovered collimating!! OH NO please don't fall into the giant dark hole collimation creates, from which theres no escaping. I have been there and it sucks the fun out of the hobby, collimate but don't seek perfection because it doesn't exist and DONT TOUCH THE SECONDARYYYYYY!!!!!!. Warning aside, its not hard, but can be if you get carried away, if the views blow you away then don't touch it, i speak from experience as a former collimation junkie.

Edited by Sunshine
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheshire Tool.

I've found this to be the most accurate tool.

I also use a Barlowed laser, or the most basic 35mm film cap, and/ or dust cap. They all work.

These tools don't actually 'tool' anything, they just  help align the eye to the scopes axis.

You could potentially align every thing by sight alone then Star test to check  accuracy. 

Once your confident with collimation on your own scope, you'll wonder what all the fuss was about ?

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Greg6498 said:

I need a a really accurate,easy to use collimating tool. I have a used laser collimator but it does not fit snugly in the focuser so I feel it’s not very accurate. The idea of collimating causes me some anxiety anyway, so accurate and easy is the key! Can any of you offer any suggestions to help me out?

How do your star tests look ?

If they are decent then I don't think you have a problem. Astro Baby's guide shows you how to do this.

I'm another user of the simple cheshire collimator with my 12 inch dobsonian.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use laser collimator to collimate my dob

If you only using your scope, home situation, very rarely need to touch your collimation

I am out couple of times per month with my club, doing presentations in primary schools, scout/guide groups, and still rarely need to re-collimate

Have found that my Saxon laser collimator, is also not a snug fit, and just put a bit of electrical tape around it to stop the wobble

John

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use a basic Cheshire only very occasionally to check the secondary mirror alignment, but I've never used anything for the primary alignment since I  discovered Gary Seronik's Tool Free method, which is basically just a star alignment.

https://garyseronik.com/no-tools-telescope-collimation/

It takes a matter of a couple of minutes to adjust the out of focus star image to the centre of view and away I go, nice sharp images  and so easy!

Edited by Geoff Barnes
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, John said:

How do your star tests look ?

If they are decent then I don't think you have a problem. Astro Baby's guide shows you how to do this.

I'm another user of the simple cheshire collimator with my 12 inch dobsonian.

 

Star test looks pretty good! I want a good collimator for when the need arises.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I also have a Cheshire, which works well, but I havent used it for years.

Most of the time the collimation just needs tweaking, so a good laser is perfect, which is why I bought the Howie Glatter. I had similar problems to you with the one I  had before.

The Howie sits snugly in the Focuser, with no movement of the beam if you rotate it. It’s a precision instrument and very well made, but pricey.

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For a tube dob there is no question: https://catseyecollimation.com/

I also use Glatters laser and Tublug for my truss dob, very very easy to use:https://starlightinstruments.com/store/index.php?route=product/product&product_id=157

You still need a sight tube with Glatters equipment to "center" the sec under the focuser.

BTW, there is no need ignore the secondary out of concerns, its all very easy.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's nothing like receiving a package from the UK, like that time I had sent a sample of questionable tea to Twinings, its having been packed here in the States, whereupon they discovered that it had indeed been adulterated.  They then, much to my surprise, sent me a box of several different flavoured teas of theirs that were absolutely wonderful, whilst they lasted.  I don't think I'll ever receive anything that nice again...

https://www.firstlightoptics.com/other-collimation-tools/premium-cheshire-collimating-eyepiece.html

That's the best Cheshire in the world, at present, although not due to its anodised colour; but that does make it a bit special nonetheless.  You won't misplace it.

If you want to give another one of these a try, there's something you should know about them...

laser-collimator2.jpg.7fd0d589dc3a01c16f7f59a877613bcd.jpg

They're improved now, and with a triplet-lens, for a tighter dot...

https://www.ebay.com/itm/1-25-SVBONY-7-Bright-Level-Next-Generation-Laser-Collimator-for-Astro-Telescope/263812604382?hash=item3d6c74e1de:g:zHsAAOSw3vFbWh6T:rk:2:pf:0

But, as with all entry-level laser-collimators, it will most likely require collimation, and before it's used to collimate the telescope...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZsgNlgIrqQ

When you have trouble with slop, with a telescope's visual-back, you shim it.  For example, I have this focusser, but it's not a 1.25", a 1.26" instead...

883474007_1.26-inchfocusser2a.jpg.084ae75acd67e7f66d1afbe5fc32eebb.jpg

That's a shim of .005"-thick PVC...

https://www.ebay.com/itm/Midwest-Products-70406-Blue-PVC-Sheets-005-x-7-6-x-11-4-sheets-/183636053625?_trksid=p2385738.m4383.l4275.c10#shpCntId#shId

https://www.hobbylobby.com/Crafts-Hobbies/Hobbies-Collecting/Tools-Blades/Brass-Sheet---0.005"/p/21620

You get the idea.  If in a pinch, a layer or two of clear packing tape will serve.  However, you may need a shim that's thicker, I do not know.  In that event, and if you don't have one already, get one of these calipers.  I have one myself, and I wouldn't be without it when working with my telescopes...

https://www.harborfreight.com/6-in-digital-caliper-61585.html

That would enable you to determine the exact deviation from the norm, then to shim accordingly.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FLO sell a collimation cap for about a fiver , and I find a 1.25  compression adapter works good for holding laser snug just turn to hold snug but so you can spin it , so turn it so laser creates a circle around primary ring that way if laser is out it doesn’t matter .

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use a Cheshire too. Unlike a laser (unless you make various additional templates) you can perform all aspects of collimation with it.

As good as the astro baby site is, I did what I consider to be a simpler but still effective guide as follows. As above, you are better getting out observing with a view that's not quite perfect than sat in your dining room fiddling and frustrated. With a guide and experience you'll learn to know when to collimate if be so quick at the important but (primary) you'll have a quick check and tweak (10 seconds) every time. Other factors, eg seeing and transparency, will have greater effects in the view than a slightly miscollimated scope.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.astro-baby.com/astrobaby/help/collimation-guide-newtonian-reflector/

This^^^ is Astro Baby's guide

FWIW I bought a laser as it seemed to sound like a good idea.  Like you I was unimpressed with it and bought a Cheshire and followed Astro Baby's guide and didn't look back.

 

 

Edited by JOC
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, bottletopburly said:

FLO sell a collimation cap for about a fiver 

I'd second this option. It's as easy as it gets and for f5 or slower it's all you need, especially for visual.

If you need to collimate the secondary (e.g. if you've had the scope apart for some reason) then I'd go for  Cheshire. The laser is handy for the initial rough alignment, but the Cheshire (or sight tube) is the best tool for finishing.

Bear in mind that with visual use of slower scopes the secondary has to be pretty bad to affect what you'll see in the eyepiece though. 90% of the time a collimation cap is plenty.

Billy.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agena Astro, in California, offers a collimation-cap, and with every item they sell with free shipping...

https://agenaastro.com/rigel-systems-aline-telescope-alignment-eyepiece.html

The collapsible's tube would need to be sealed, with a shroud I imagine, then a white cloth or other over the opening at the front.  Then, a lamp in front of that to illuminate the telescope's interior...

collimation1a.jpg.c99e351a29c2ba0b05f7582bf32340a5.jpg

It is then that the entire optical system can be seen, although I use a small camera to zoom in and snap a shot.  It's all there within this image, and with the collimation thrown out slightly to illustrate and describe...

240325150_badcollimation3.jpg.2c5b19160f19bf0694fea97be0fd9088.jpg

1. The hole in the center of the cap, and through which the image was taken with a camera

2. The center-spot of the primary-mirror

3. The reflective underside of the cap

4. The silhouette, or shadow, of the secondary-mirror

5. The secondary-assembly's spider-vanes; nasty things those are.

6. The reflective surface of the primary-mirror; all of the white area in fact

7. The primary-mirror's clips; all three, or however many, should be visible, and evenly.

8. The interior of the drawtube

Edited by Alan64
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, Alan64 said:

There's nothing like receiving a package from the UK, like that time I had sent a sample of questionable tea to Twinings, its having been packed here in the States, whereupon they discovered that it had indeed been adulterated.  They then, much to my surprise, sent me a box of several different flavoured teas of theirs that were absolutely wonderful, whilst they lasted.  I don't think I'll ever receive anything that nice again...

https://www.firstlightoptics.com/other-collimation-tools/premium-cheshire-collimating-eyepiece.html

That's the best Cheshire in the world, at present, although not due to its anodised colour; but that does make it a bit special nonetheless.  You won't misplace it.

If you want to give another one of these a try, there's something you should know about them...

laser-collimator2.jpg.7fd0d589dc3a01c16f7f59a877613bcd.jpg

They're improved now, and with a triplet-lens, for a tighter dot...

https://www.ebay.com/itm/1-25-SVBONY-7-Bright-Level-Next-Generation-Laser-Collimator-for-Astro-Telescope/263812604382?hash=item3d6c74e1de:g:zHsAAOSw3vFbWh6T:rk:2:pf:0

But, as with all entry-level laser-collimators, it will most likely require collimation, and before it's used to collimate the telescope...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZsgNlgIrqQ

When you have trouble with slop, with a telescope's visual-back, you shim it.  For example, I have this focusser, but it's not a 1.25", a 1.26" instead...

883474007_1.26-inchfocusser2a.jpg.084ae75acd67e7f66d1afbe5fc32eebb.jpg

That's a shim of .005"-thick PVC...

https://www.ebay.com/itm/Midwest-Products-70406-Blue-PVC-Sheets-005-x-7-6-x-11-4-sheets-/183636053625?_trksid=p2385738.m4383.l4275.c10#shpCntId#shId

https://www.hobbylobby.com/Crafts-Hobbies/Hobbies-Collecting/Tools-Blades/Brass-Sheet---0.005"/p/21620

You get the idea.  If in a pinch, a layer or two of clear packing tape will serve.  However, you may need a shim that's thicker, I do not know.  In that event, and if you don't have one already, get one of these calipers.  I have one myself, and I wouldn't be without it when working with my telescopes...

https://www.harborfreight.com/6-in-digital-caliper-61585.html

That would enable you to determine the exact deviation from the norm, then to shim accordingly.

 

Hi Alan! I really like the collimating Cheshire eyepiece from first light optics that you recommended, but how do you use it?

Greg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Greg6498 said:

Hi Alan! I really like the collimating Cheshire eyepiece from first light optics that you recommended, but how do you use it?

Greg

You had asked the same within a PM.  I've replied to you there.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, billyharris72 said:

I'd second this option. It's as easy as it gets and for f5 or slower it's all you need, especially for visual.

If you need to collimate the secondary (e.g. if you've had the scope apart for some reason) then I'd go for  Cheshire. The laser is handy for the initial rough alignment, but the Cheshire (or sight tube) is the best tool for finishing.

Bear in mind that with visual use of slower scopes the secondary has to be pretty bad to affect what you'll see in the eyepiece though. 90% of the time a collimation cap is plenty.

Billy.

I agree entirely with your observations.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Dinglem
      I've upgraded my focuser so have a Skywatcher Dual-Speed Low Profile 1.25/2" Crayford focuser for sale £70 delivered to UK only.
      Bank transfer or Paypal F&F preferred.
       
       

    • By Owmuchonomy
      Wrapping up in double layer goose feathers I braved the obsy last night.  I planned a tour of Auriga with a view to chucking in some favourites.  I set up the ED150 on the AZ EQ 6 and fitted the WO quartz diagonal accompanied by my ES 20mm 82'.  I stuffed my Astronomik 1.25" UHC (bargain price thanks @FLO) in my pocket too.  This set up required the retro children's playroom chair with the legs sawn down due to the position of Auriga. I spent about half an hour checking the plethora of open clusters sprinkled in or near the Milky Way.  The sky was one of the best this season so it was a jewelled spectacle and the ED150 reveals such sharp colours enabling me to distinguish the cooler stars in some of the clusters particularly the occasional red giant.  As Monoceros reached the meridian I moved to the open cluster associated with the Rosette. Now, for all my efforts over the years, the emission nebulosity has eluded my eyes but tonight with this newish 6" frac I was somewhat taken aback to see a doughnut appear in the view.  Switching to a view with the UHC filter was nothing short of astonishing!  It wasn't just there; I was falling into its centre.  Texture, depth and dark globules were easily discernible.  The extent was slightly larger than the FOV with the 20mm so I slewed slowly around and the perimeters and varying consistency of the Ha emission were easily picked out.  I spent a long and happy time soaking this up; it was truly outstanding.  Thoroughly recommended.  I retired happily to the warm kitchen and toast.
    • By Greg6498
      Hello all!
      I just installed this Lacerta 1:10 Micro Transmission focuser on my 8” Skywatcher Dobsonian. It is a direct replacement for the stock focuser and works extremely well. I was surprised at how easy it was to install! Ordered it from 365Astronomy and got fast shipping.
       


    • By Kronos831
      This is probably my options as of now:I will definetly buy a 12mm BST Starguider A 2X BST Barlow( So thats 100x and 200x magnification) 
      AND Either:
      15MM BST STARGUIDER VS 25MM STARGUIDER
      My dobsonian telescope will include:A 25mm and 10mm Eyepiece . So the obvious awnser is to go for the 15mm BUT i ve read in reviews that the bst s have are noticabely better than the eyepieces that come with my telescope.So i am wondering, should i buy the 25mm or the 15mm BST? 
       
      Also is it worth to barlow either 25mm eyepiece to make 12.5mm and ditch the 12mm i am definetly buying for a 6mm one? i am thinking not because if i barlow the 6 mm it will give me 400x and i think that is too much magnification for the image to appear clear , plus i will also barlow the 10 mm to give me a 240x the acceptable limit for good clarity / magnification ratio (i ve read that and not sure if its true or not). Thanks again for your time and help!
      This forum has been very polite, welcoming and kind to noobs like me just getting into the hobby XD I hope i can one day look back at myself and laugh at my ignorance! This site has been truly amazing and i hope i can stay a member for a long time to come!
      Thanks as always
      Clear skies everyone
      Kronos
×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.