Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

stargazine_ep3_banner.thumb.jpg.5533fb830ae914798f4dbbdd2c8a5853.jpg

Sign in to follow this  
eshy76

First Image of 2019: M45

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

One and a half clear nights for me early in the year and I focused on M45. As a naked eye visible target, I think subconsciously I never gave M45 the concentration it deserves, thinking I could always catch it another time.

Anyway, despite lusting after the Horsehead, I kept my refractor pointed at the seven sisters in new moon skies and the result is below.

I actually found it pretty hard to process...the seven sisters themselves were pretty well behaved, but I couldn't decide what to do with the background. I know this is a dusty region so I did not want to put DBE samples everywhere. But at the end the background seems a bit smudgy after tweaking curves - I'm not sure whether to darken the background or leave it as is.

3.4 hours of LRGB integration. Full details on Astrobin.

Thanks for looking!

M45 08-01-19 (Downscaled)-909x687.png

  • Like 9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When in doubt (which is often!) I put a marker in the darkest possible place close the each corner. Just four markers work pretty well in these cases. I also even things up with a dose of SCNR green as the second adjustment. I'm not sure about that dark patch left of the main cluster. Is it in the data when give a stretch and no other processing?

Olly

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the tips Olly  - I'll give the 4 corners pointer a try. As well as my STF data, I tried to look at reference images to judge the DBE points and they were mainly on the left of the cluster...maybe that explains the dark patch! I'll check my data again later - I think it was actually pretty clean, so my processing is what probably what needs to be looked at and the initial DBE is a strong potential culprit. 

I did SCNR green on the RGB data, but when stretching, started to move the channels around - the black points of the R and B channels were off, but I guess the second I start adjusting those, colour balance (I had done PCC earlier too) starts getting messed up?

The data is there, though, so I can definitely reprocess to do it full justice - it was refreshing that it was hard to mess up the main cluster no matter what Pixinsight tool I used...so I'm convinced there's a better M45 image in there!

Thanks again!


 

Edited by eshy76
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I always think it's risky not to have four corners sampled...

Olly

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So I gave this another go in terms of processing - more use of DBE...more controlled background.

I think I had flats issues too - I committed the cardinal sin of connecting the imaging camera to my USB hub instead of the mini pc as I always have before - I noticed some patterns in the flats that weren't there before. Never change a setup that works if it can be avoided!

I think this looks better!

540811363_M4508-01-19(Reprocess1-Downsampled)-900x679.png.0ad233f5559e75853bcd7d79b47dc150.png

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

wow, quite a bit of difference to the first image, looks a lot better now.

well done.

Paul

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Nick Smith said:

Great job!  Hate to say it though, probably slightly out of focus??

Thanks Nick - yes probably - that was my last shot before I installed my Lakeside focuser, which is yet to see first light...hopefully focus issues will be a thing of the past soon!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, ultranova said:

wow, quite a bit of difference to the first image, looks a lot better now.

well done.

Paul

Thank you Paul - I'm still trying to work out the balance between over and under processing images. I want authenticity as much as possible, but clearly the light touch I used in the first attempt left major background issues. So I was less subtle with DBE (Pixinsight) the second time around!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By jamesj01
      Hi everyone,
      I am new to astrophotography and of course started by taking a photo of the moon (as attached) using my Canon EOS500D camera - 1/250 exposure time, 800ISO. I used my celestron 127EQ telescope with a adapter for the camera of course. I used no eyepiece. 
      However, i find that it is slightly blurred, and upon taking pictures of nearby stars, i also found them to be blurred, even with a high exposure time. am i doing anything wrong at all or is this simply because of my setup? 
      Many thanks
      IMG_3243.CR2
    • By javaruba
      Hi folks,
      I've been seeing tear drop shape stars with the EdgeHd 8 and ZWO ASI294MC Pro camera, so I verified the collimation. I'm using a celestron x0.7 reducer.
      Does collimation needs to be checked  with an eyepiece or with the camera and with or without reducer? I'm asking since I verified my collimation yesterday and couldn't see the concentric rings with the complete imaging train (ASI294MC, OAG, and x0.7 reducer). It was only showing the inner shadow and outer circle. I than  replaced the AS294MC with my guide cam (ASI120) which has a much smaller sensor and could see many rings. While, to my view, it seems to be collimated, it's strange that I can't see the rings with the main imaging cam. Any thoughts? Here's how I left the collimation after some adjustments with the guide cam.

      Kind regards,
      Jairo
    • By ChrisBAgile
      I'm brand new to the forum and new to Astro. I've been loving it since January and learnt a huge amount by myself with the help of forums like these.
      I recently purchased an iOptron 10" RC truss. 3" focuser with a 2" compression. I have been using a WO FLT 132 before this which is little more forgiving. I have attached a couple of pictures from my first attempts. I am not using a field flattener at this point. (just getting used to collimating and setting up). Camera ZWO ASI 6200 MC cooled camera. The images below are composed of 50 x 5 minute subs stacked in pixinsight with basic image processing. I'm using PHD II and a WO guidestar 61 and ASI 120 for guiding on a CEM60EC mount. Drift alignment in PHD 2. Any ideas as to the main causes of egg shaped stars? Could this be sensor tilt? crappy guiding? Focus also looks off? Any help appreciated please
       


    • By crossingsymmetry
      Greetings everyone.
      I recently scored a great deal on facebook marketplace and bought Skywatcher Skymax 180 mm Maksutov-Cassegrain Telescope (f/15) with EQ6R-pro mount. I understand that long focal length telescopes are more suitable for planetary imaging. However, as I am tight on budget, I would like to use the same scope for deep-sky astrophotography. I have Canon Rebel T5 DSLR camera that I am using for taking images. Without autoguiding and a decent polar alignment, I can get ~30 seconds long shots without any star trailing, but that's not sufficient for imaging objects like M51. I would like to be able to integrate longer, say few minutes, thus would like to purchase an autoguider.  Here are some specific questions I have.
      1). The telescope comes with an 8 x 50 straight-through finder.  If I were to use it as a guidescope, what type of image integration time can I expect? Has anyone done autoguiding for f/15 scope with an 8x50 or other finderscopes?
      2). If the integration time will be an issue with the 8x50 finder scope, I am open to purchasing an off-axis-guider. However, considering the narrow field-of-view of Mak-180 telescope, I am concerned about not having enough photons from guidestar for autoguiding. For instance, with my DSLR camera, I need to integrate 20-30 seconds to see the nearby stars in M51. What type of OAG and camera would I need to autoguide with my scope? Are there affordable cameras (~$200) that would do the job for me? Would ASI120MM Mini Monochrome (~$150) do the job? What about OAG?
      I plan to use phd2 software for autoguiding rather than relying on the build-in guide port on the mount.  Instead of integrating for hours, I am planning to do DSS stacking of few mintues long multiple shots, hopefully this will put less strict requirements on the autoguider.
      In case this information is relevant: with my current setup, I have no issue pointing my scope to a desired deep-sky object, track the object within the field-of-view of my DSLR camera for hours using the mechnical tracking of the EQ6 mount. For instance following is a single raw image of Ring nebula taken with 30 seconds shot.  But it is not enough for generating high-quality images. 

       
      Thank you in advance for your help.
       
      Regards,
      Jay
       
    • By Adaaam75
      Hi guys,
      So on Tuesday night I spent the evening imaging the moon with my Celestron 9.25 SCT and DSLR as shown below and am happy with the images I collated (I only took images as I did intend to take capture video but I got carried away and time was getting on).
      I have approx 350 jpeg (and the equivalent in raw) images and have used the Microsoft image composite editor to stitch the frames together without editing them first etc but I wonder if I'm going the images an injustice?
      I'm not ready to pay for editing software as I know there is a lot of very good free downloads out there and I'm asking for recommendations. Should I be processing the frames before/after stitching and what software would you recommend? Please offer any advice you have.
      I will post the resulting image once I'm happy with the outcome 😁
      Thanks in advance!
       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.