Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_30_second_exp_2_winners.thumb.jpg.b5430b40547c40d344fd4493776ab99f.jpg

laser_jock99

2019 CPRE Star Count

Recommended Posts

The Campaign To Protect Rural England are running another star survey to monitor the spread of Light Pollution- details here:

https://www.cpre.org.uk/what-we-do/countryside/dark-skies/star-count-2019?utm_medium=email&utm_source=engagingnetworks&utm_campaign=campaigns-update-2019-jan&utm_content=Campaigns+Update+2019+Jan

TAKE PART: 2 February - 23 February

Help us reclaim our dark skies

Dark, starry skies are one of the most magical sights the countryside can offer. But light pollution means many of us can’t see the stars. We want to reconnect people with the wonder of our glorious night skies.

You can take part in #StarCount2019 and help us map light pollution, to ensure more of us can enjoy the most magical sight the countryside has to offer.

Our Star Count will take place this February, when we’ll be asking you to look up at the night sky and tell us how many you can see in Orion. You can do this from anywhere in England.

The results will help us to create a new map to show how light pollution affects everybody’s views of the night sky.

 

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that, I was wondering when they were going to do another count.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, let's hope the current perpetually cloudy skies relent in February!  One point though with these surveys.  Do they take into account the age and eyesight of the observers?  At age 75 my pupil at full dilation is likely to be around 5mm whereas in a young person it should be nearer 7 mm or larger.  That equates to twice the light grasp for the younger person and almost a full magnitude in star visibility.  So although I have quite dark skies where I live, I'm limited in what I can see naked eye.  One of the reasons why I'm primarily into astrophotography.   So I hope there is an age entry on the report form and that the analysis makes adjustments accordingly.

Cheers,

Peter

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, petevasey said:

Well, let's hope the current perpetually cloudy skies relent in February!  One point though with these surveys.  Do they take into account the age and eyesight of the observers?  At age 75 my pupil at full dilation is likely to be around 5mm whereas in a young person it should be nearer 7 mm or larger.  That equates to twice the light grasp for the younger person and almost a full magnitude in star visibility.  So although I have quite dark skies where I live, I'm limited in what I can see naked eye.  One of the reasons why I'm primarily into astrophotography.   So I hope there is an age entry on the report form and that the analysis makes adjustments accordingly.

Cheers,

Peter

I don't believe this is meant to be a fully scientific survey as there are way to many variables. It's more for public particpation and raising awareness of the issues.

The result of the last survey in 2012

Star-Count-Map-2012.jpg

Edited by laser_jock99

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Submitted my counts now- 18 in Warks, 26 in Powys. My eyes are getting older now- straining to see those fainter stars on the edge of visibilty!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Scooot
      I was told by a friend who has close ties with the council that Basildon District are abandoning their part-night lighting in a few weeks. Apparently the street lights which currently go off at 1am are going to be left on at cost of circa £275,000 per year. They are supposedly going to fund this from reserves.
      Anyway, did a bit of googling and found this  https://www.basildon.gov.uk/article/7711/In-the-news-Councillors-united-behind-plan-to-switch-street-lights-back-on-through-night
      I wonder how many people will notice!
    • By Asghar
      Hey guys,
       
      I'm new here and thus question has been on my head all day. Tell me your thoughts! The light pollution is p******* me off!
    • By Phillips6549
      Just found this.  https://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/amp/49836623
      Let's hope it is a success and the good folk of Switzerland enjoy some clear dark skies. 
    • By Captain Magenta
      Last year I was given a Unihedron SQM-L, the narrow field of view version of their gadget for measuring night-sky brightness. Since then, I’ve nipped outside to take zenith readings whenever I’ve been able, often a few times per night. As a result I now have 85 data-points, all from my back garden in Sunbury on Thames which rates a 19.04 on www.lightpollutionmap.info . As it turns out, this agrees well with the data I’ve collected.
      The darkest I’ve measured at this location has been 19.13, with 4 records better than 19.05 and 10 better than 19.00.
      Plotted against Moon altitude, it looks like:

      One thing I noticed very early on was that the reading generally gets darker and darker as the night goes on. The chart below suggests the data agrees, but how strongly I’m not adept enough yet with my statistics to work out. If anyone fancies doing this for me, I’d be grateful, I’ve attached the data .csv file I think to the end of this post.

      The data itself: each record contains date, time[GMT], SQM value, Moon phase, Moon altitude . For the purposes of my analysis, I’ve converted the time value into hoursafter6pm, which allows the intercept of the regression solution to be loosely considered as the “6pm starting point” for the darkness estimation, which is OK for this dataset as my data is all from this latest Autumn/Winter.
      I’ve done an “ordinary least-squares” regression with multiple input variables. At first glance it seems to me that the SQ vs altitude chart above should not behave well with that: there’s a clear kink, intuitively obvious I guess, at the point the Moon altitude goes negative.
      To cope with that, I divided my data into two and did three separate regressions: “Moon up” data, “Moon down”, and “All data” but treating phase and altitude as zero if the Moon is below -5 degrees (I chose -5 degrees arbitrarily).
      With Moon up, I decided the SQM value will depend on Time of Night, Moon Altitude and Phase. With Moon down, it only needs to depend on time of night.
      Thus my regression model is:
      SkyQual = a + b.timeafter6pm + c.phase + d.altitude + residual
      or rearranged
      residual = a + b.timeafter6pm + c.phase + d.altitude – SkyQual
      The analysis involves minimizing the sum of (the squares of the) residuals, by hunting around for the appropriate values of a, b, c & d which yields this minimum. I used MS Excel’s built-in Solver to do the “hunting around”.
      The following table summarizes the results:

      In words, using “Moon Up” as my subject, my Sky Quality, in magnitudes per arc-second, can be estimated as
      19.28 mags/arc-sec
      plus 0.0314 /hour
      minus 0.864 /full-phase (or 0.216 /quarter)
      minus 0.0186 /degree above horizon (or 0.186 /10 degrees).
      This is a pretty simple analysis. I’m sure there’s theory and formulae available relating Moon-altitude and -phase to extra sky brightness, but I haven’t used any of that here. And the “error model” I’ve used implicitly assumes that the relationships between SQM-reading and the variables are linear.
      If anyone is curious and wishes to do their own analysis, my raw-ish data is available as a .csv file attachment at the end of this post.
      Cheers,
      Magnus
       
      A note about the data collection: each reading is an average of a few readings at a given time, with outliers rejected. For instance, often the first press yields an outlier, and over the following few seconds subsequent ones tend to settle down. So the series of readings 19.05 (me getting excited), 18.85, 18.86, 18.86 , which is a quite typical pattern, would cause me to record 18.86. My highest recorded reading, 19.13, was indeed where it settled down.
      Other “one-on-one” charts:
         
      SQMLdata201903.csv
    • By Gfamily
      I gave a demonstration/workshop at my local Astro Group* about a simple way of removing light pollution from an Astro Photo. 
      The description I gave was deliberately for beginners, using a wide angle tripod shot photo and using one of the easiest packages to get to grips with (Paint.net). 
      The attached pdf covers the basic technique. 
      I'd appreciate any feedback on it. 
       
       
       
      * The Mid Cheshire Astronomical Group - all welcome, we meet on the last Friday of the Month.
      LP MCAG.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.