Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_comet_46p_winners.thumb.jpg.b3d48fd93cbd17bff31f578b27cc6f0d.jpg

Lead_weight

IC 417, NGC 1907, NGC 1931 - All-in-one.

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Spent the last three nights imaging these three objects. Managed to get them all in the same frame of my ES 102mm FCD100 scope. Pretty happy with how it turned out. I would have liked to have grabbed a little more SII data. When I originally captured it, I thought I might only have two clear nights, so I imaged it as HA/OIII. Turns out there's almost no OIII. On the third night, clouds were supposed to roll in about 4am, cutting the imaging session short, but it stayed clear the whole night, and I got a full night of data with the exception that I got a late start due to technical issues when I first started imaging.

The ASI1600's halos are rearing their ugly heads on the two brightest stars. I tried to tone them down some by desaturating the colors around both stars...it worked a bit.

Another 15 hours and I could probably get rid of any remaining grain, but just don't have the clear nights to get it done. 15.8 hours total imaging time.

Equipment:

  • Celestron CGX
  • Explore Scientific 102mm FCD100
  • ZWO ASI1600MM-C
  • ZWO Filter Wheel with Astrodon 5nm filters
  • ZWO ASI290MM Mini guide camera 
  • Stellarvue F50G guide scope

IC417.jpg

Edited by Lead_weight
Added total imaging time.
  • Like 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

NGC 1931 is a beautiful object that I mention several times in my new book, Bright and Dark Nebulae that you can find on Amazon.  I discuss it along with NGC 7129 as objects that take a wide range of magnification without lose of the faint nebula.  I first observed it visually in a Tasco 2" f/8 in the 1960s and have observed it with scopes up to 100" like many of the other over 1000 objects discussed in my new book.  The secret to observing many of the supposedly "difficult" nebulae is to do so simply in a dark sky.  Naked eye, small scopes, big scopes and any number of filters are less significant than that of a very dark sky.  Of course, an attitude of not quitting at a first failure is also helpful!  nebulaeman

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That is really nice, Andrew.

I particularly like (what I presume is called) the fish nebula in the top right quadrant.  It's really clear in this picture ... facing towards the left side of the picture with quite a prominent snout, the things I thought might have been lightning strikes emanating from an amorphous cloud at first glance are actually feelers or gills of some sort, there's a dark patch for its eye and its tail forms a v-shape heading towards the right hand side of the picture.

I promise ... I will cut down on the mushrooms!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By MeyGray3833
      Finally completed my SHO version. There is some purple in the image I cannot figure out how to get rid of and I'm sick of playing with it. Hints and tips on how to get rid of it welcome, I'm using PixInsight.


      https://pbase.com/grahammeyer/image/169136922


      Scroll to the bottom for size options and details.


      Thanks for looking!
       

    • By eshy76
      Hi everyone,
      This has been on my hard drive for some months, so nice to have finally got round to processing it! Shot over several nights in January in my back garden.
      NGC 281, also known casually as the Pacman Nebula, is a bright emission nebula and part of an H II region in the northern constellation of Cassiopeia and is part of the Milky Way's Perseus Spiral Arm. It lies about 9,500 light years from us and is 48 light years across.
      As the final version, I've gone for a crop, which I think holds up well, though I'll include the wider fov version in the next post.
      I used a more natural colour blend for this image:
      R = 76%*Ha + 24%*SII
      G = 100%*OIII
      B = 85%*OIII + 15%*Ha
      For some reason, I was not expecting much from this image, but the result looks like it will be one of my favourites...the narrowband data was really good!
      Captured using APT, stacked using APP and processed in Pixinsight.
      5.4 hours integration time.
      Link to full details and higher res version.
      Thanks for looking!

    • By MeyGray3833
      Hello Astro Peeps, I hope everyone is all good! Isn't there some amazing images on this site and others. Amateur imaging has never been so good!
      I myself have finally managed to get some data for an image, of which I am very happy. It has been so hot here it has been impossible to get any good data. One day a couple of months ago, I hung the thermometer from the grape vine under the back verandah and it was 47.5°C. Sounds far fetched, although true. I live in Adelaide, South Australia and we are 11km from the CBD and usually 1.5 degrees hotter than there!
      Anyway, I thought I'd try my hand at a Ha, OIII bi-colour image while waiting for my SII data to come in. There seems to be a halo issue with some of the filters for which I will need to do further testing so I apologise for their distracting nature. Details are with the image but basically 3hrsx15min subs for each channel.
      https://pbase.com/grahammeyer/image/169113477
      You can scroll to the bottom to choose another size or auto to fit your screen.
       
      Happy photon collecting! ?
      Details for those that cannot see them.
      Telescope: William Optics FLT132

      Guide Scope: QHY OAG

      Camera: QHY9 Mono @ -20c

      Filter Wheel: QHY 7 position Ultra Slim

      Filters: Baader 36mm unmounted L R G B HA OIII SII

      Guide Camera: QHY5L-II

      Mount: AZ-EQ6

      Mount Control: EQASCOM

      Focusing: SharpSky Pro and Sequence Generator Pro 3 (automated)

      Bahtinov Mask: No (initial focus)

      Capture Software: Sequence Generator Pro 3

      Guiding Software: PHD2

      Calibration and Stacking Software: PixInsight

      Processing Software: PixInsight

      Number and Type of Data Frames: L= X min, R= x min, G= x min, B= x min

      Ha= 12x15min, SII= x , OIII= 12x15min.

      Binning: 1x1

      Total Image Time: 6 hrs

      Location: Lockleys Observatory B, Tanunda, Sth Australia

      Light Box by Exfso
         
    • By Hughsie
      As open clusters go NGC 2281 doesn't have much to shout about when comparing it to the Beehive Cluster or Pleaides and appears not to be a common target for Astrophotographers. However, what it does have is a name which accurately depicts what you see.
      It's a bit of a magic eye moment, but stare at the bright star in the centre of the frame. This is the 'point' of the heart which sits above it.
      20 light frames of 100 s each.
      15 dark frames,
      25 flat and bias frames.
      Taken with a William Optics Z61, ZWO ASI294MC Pro Cooled set at -15 degrees and unity gain all atop a Celestron AVX mount.
      Thank you for dropping by.
       
      John

    • By masjstovel
      Hi,
       
      I am looking at buying one of these, and need some guidance.
      Celestron Nexstar 4 SE
      Sky-Watcher Explorer-130P Synscan AZ GOTO
      Celestron Nexstar 127 SLT MAK
       
      I ended up With these 3 Choices mostly because of the cost I am willing to do the first time, and it seems like they have some abilities (motorized with GoTo-options)
      Priority 1: I want to observe nebulas, and galaxies (i.e. Andromeda)  on a decent "zoom" and focus.
      Priority 2: I want to do astrophotography.

      I've read elsewhere on the forum than its preferable to have an equatorial mount for astrophotography. As far as i can see none of the above have that, even if Celestron Nexstar 4SE is promoting astrophotography on the product info. Or have i misunderstood here and one of the above has an equatorial mount?
      The Product info on the Celestron Nexstar 4 SE says it has Alt-Az, EQ North & EQ South. Does this mean it has both options, az-al and equatorial mount?.
       
      I think should add that i consider myself at least an "above beginner"-photographer, and Photoshop user. I use NIKON D810 - is this even mountable on one of the telescopes mentioned here?
      I also have the Sky-Watcher Star Adventurer mini. Can i setup one of the telescopes mentioned with this and call it a telescope with equatorial mount? 

      I guess some of these questions might seem stupid to you, but I just dont know alot regarding telescopes yet:)

      Thanks in advance for any replies.
         
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.