Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_comet_46p_winners.thumb.jpg.b3d48fd93cbd17bff31f578b27cc6f0d.jpg

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Probably a stupid question...

Heyyy soo i am a begginer and about to buy my first telescope.A Skywatcher 200 

p. I ve just though of something , Since i know filters can be stacked i ve been wondering if i could take visual RGB filters and stack them.Specifically blue green and red in order to create a visual full colour image ,like photography. I know its probably a stupid question because people all over the world would have done this by now .But i m just curious. 

 

-Kronos

Edited by Kronos831
Forgot to write a word

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Kronos and welcome to SGL.

Nice first scope, you will see a lot with it.

Not a stupid question at all. (The only stupid question is the one you don't ask)

The way you do this is to take a monochrome image with each of the filters and then combine them in a program like Photoshop. If AP is where your passion lies, do yourself a favour and get yourself a copy of this book. It will save you time, trouble and heartache in the longrun.

Enjoy the journey.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First of all , thanks! Second of all i am talking about visual rgb filters i want to stack them in they eyepiece so i can get a full colour image(visually) it's probably not possible i just want to know why.I ll take a look at the book too thanks! Also whats the difference between getting rgb filters for photography and just processing the image in photoshop?

Thanks

 

-Kronos

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Kronos831 said:

First of all , thanks! Second of all i am talking about visual rgb filters i want to stack them in they eyepiece so i can get a full colour image(visually) it's probably not possible i just want to know why.I ll take a look at the book too thanks! Also whats the difference between getting rgb filters for photography and just processing the image in photoshop?

Thanks

 

-Kronos

What you are proposing won't work. Each colour filter blocks the other two colours so no light will reach he eyepiece if all three are stacked together. RGB imaging creates a colour image from three separate monochrome image files, one through the red filter, one through the blue and one through the green.  The monochrome images can then be combined in photoshop to create a colour image.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, misunderstood what you were asking.

No that would not work. Each of the filters (red green & blue) only allow light of that colour through, blocking the other colours. So by the time you had stacked all three in the eyepiece, you would be blocking light in all three colours and would see nothing.

When you take a photograph with RGB filters, you take three photos of the same object, one with each filter, using a monochrome camera. You  now have three black and white photos, but to regain the colour, you need to combine them into one photo. Photoshop has "channels" for each colour, so you load the image taken with the red filter into the red channel and similarly with green and blue. When you combine them, this gives you the colour image.

The alternative for getting a colour image is to use a colour camera, when you don't need to use filters. There are advantages and disadvantages to each option.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Just beat me to it, Peter, but at least we are both saying the same thing 😀

Edited by Demonperformer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That won't work either visual of photography since RGB Filters can only be used effectively one at a time. Each filter will block the light outside the actual color being transmitted, so by using all filters stacked you will get very little transmission of anything (in theory in a perfect world it would block every wavelength).

The difference between visual and photography filters is that the photography filters block all NIR wavelengths.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Like pointed out, red, green and blue filters combined will cut out all light.

Reason why we see shades of gray and not color image when observing is not the same as with black and white photography (and use of filters to get color). We see black and white when observing is because light from nebulae and galaxies is very very dim, and it excites only cells in our eye responsible for "black and white" image and not color cells - not enough light to excite those cells. You might want to look up that on internet - there are two different type of receptor cells in eye called rod and cone cells and they work differently. So no amount of filtering will help there, but what will help is large telescope. Very large telescope :D. Some people reported seeing color in some nebulae when using 16 inch and above telescopes if nebula is strong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The other issue is that much of the detail you see in photographs of nebula etc consists of imaging very specific wavelengths that we cannot see with the naked eye and combining them with the colour data from the RGB frames that are captured.

Specialist astro cameras can 'see' well in to the infrared and ultraviolet parts of the spectrum which our eyes sadly cannot do so sadly there is not a way of seeing the detail and colour that you see in some of the outstanding images on here :( 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Yeah i know our eyes are more sensitive to grey-ish lights and am very aware that we cannot simply see  colorfull views with a telescope (dsos atleast)  i just wandered why i couldnt combine 3 filters to make a colorful image. That’s it

 

 

kronos

Edited by Kronos831

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Galaxyfaraway
      This is maybe my 3rd attempt at a galaxy and I am trying to figure out the best way of doing it since I live in a red zone of London suburbs.
      I took this over 2 nights (well, 1.5 really, as my guiding wasn't working and plate solver wouldn't comply after meridian flip...) with my 8" EdgeHD SCT with 0.7x reducer and Atik 490X. Around 20 Luminance subs at 10 mins each  (1x1) and around 15 RGB subs at 5 mins each, but binned 2x2. I use Astrodon filters but also have an LP filter permanently in my image train. 
      Question: should I only use RGB and create a synthetic L channel, given LP, or continue trying with the actual luminance? Gradients are horrible with luminance but RGB doesn't have as much detail (only red filter seems to be more sensitive).
      My stars are all over the place (colours pop out everywhere, in the wrong way), how can I control this better?
      Also, as I wrote, the red filter seems to have much more detail than the rest and when I add all the channels into PS, the red colour just overpowers everything (and in general, how can I keep the star colours as they are and not have the red and blue go crazy - I am not sure the name for it, but it looks like chromatic aberration on steroids).
      Any other general tips would be great...
      Thank in advance. GFA
      PS: I cheated with the core: just changed the temperature to make it look a bit more glowy; for some reason, I barely had any yellow colour from the data...I will post stacked images, if of interest.
       
       
    • By Kronos831
      Hey guys,im currently on a school trip and brought my celestron firstscope with, tonight we ll  be trying some dsos and maybe saturn and jupiter,the telescope itself is not collimated and dirty (on the mirrors)So I wanted to ask.in the scope, there is no primary adjustment screws,only the ones to take it off .Does that mean that its set , allowing me to take it off wash it and back on without having to recollimate the primary?
      Thanks
      Kronos
    • By Fieldsy
      Hi guys
      Looking at getting some rgb filters and I def understand you get what you pay for.
      Anyone able to recommend a quality 1.25 set for a reasonable price .
      🤞🏻si
    • By Kronos831
      Hey guys!i need to make this quick! I want to get a new 6mm eyepiece.I have a 8" f6 dob and i want to get a nice 200 mag and put the telescope to its limits at 400x
      The most i ve seen with is 240x for Jupiter and Saturn .i ve heard they looked stunning at 400x and i am keen on trying it.Ive got my eyes on a 6mm Skywatcher UWA eyepiece.and i have a Bst Starguider 2z Barlow lens.And i seem to be having problems with my 8mm Bst Starguider (300x in total).the bst has a 16mm eye relief and a 21mm lens diameter,but when i barlowed it and look at the moon yesterday,it was hard finding the right spot to look through the eyepiece and when i moved the image disappeared.I dont know if it will have that effect on planets,when I looked at mars it was fine but i definitely want to avoid that from happening again.Will it happen?
      The Skywatcher eyepiece i want to buy has a 16mm eye relief too.I dont want to make the same mistake now , i want a 6mm eyepiece at the price range of 50-70 euro either from flo or amazonuk.If the Skywatcher will have similar results,can you suggest another one?
    • By JaydenvdH
      National Geographic 90/1250 maksutov is my telescope  and thanks for all the replies and support of my previous post it helped me alot and i figured out how to see the moon for example in beautiful quality
      but there's the problem i have. I can only see good views and a sharp sight of the moon but that's about it. Do i need a better lens that can zoom even more out or is this the limit of my telescope?
      Please let me know if you know a solution to this. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.