Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_celestial_motion.thumb.jpg.a9e9349c45f96ed7928eb32f1baf76ed.jpg

Recommended Posts

Hello all!

I want to upgrade the focuser on my Skywatcher 8" truss dobsonian. I want a dual focuser that's a direct fit to my Skywatcher.  Any suggstions ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Without sounding patronizing (my apologies) Your scope is brand new, unless you've used yours enough to know you want a better one you may just find yours is fine, now if you do want to upgrade then theres no harm in that either. I say this because it happens to all of us either new to the hobby or a new scope, you want everything upgraded right away, when what we had was fine, having said that, here's one i found for you which is priced in the mid range and does the trick, i have used this same one on my lightbridge and it was fine, i am assuming it should mate with your skywatcher but just in case inquire with the vendor.

https://agenaastro.com/antares-low-profile-focuser-gear-drive-reflectors-dual-speed.html

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Go with the Lacerta upgrade option recommended in previous posts. It is cheap, easy to fit and works a treat. I did splash out on a Moonlite gourmet effort for my big Dob. But the 10” still has the standard Skywatcher plus Lacerta. I’ve no plans to upgrade. 

Remember that the standard focuser can be adjusted in terms of alignment and friction.

Paul

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 28/12/2018 at 19:20, Sunshine said:

Without sounding patronizing (my apologies) Your scope is brand new, unless you've used yours enough to know you want a better one you may just find yours is fine, now if you do want to upgrade then theres no harm in that either. I say this because it happens to all of us either new to the hobby or a new scope, you want everything upgraded right away, when what we had was fine, having said that, here's one i found for you which is priced in the mid range and does the trick, i have used this same one on my lightbridge and it was fine, i am assuming it should mate with your skywatcher but just in case inquire with the vendor.

https://agenaastro.com/antares-low-profile-focuser-gear-drive-reflectors-dual-speed.html

thank you! My scope is new, but while using it, I noticed I missed a “fine tune” mechanism. That’s why I want the upgrade. I am really liking the Lacerta add on fro 365!

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Greg6498 said:

thank you! My scope is new, but while using it, I noticed I missed a “fine tune” mechanism. That’s why I want the upgrade. I am really liking the Lacerta add on fro 365!

Awesome! yes that lacerta kit looks perfect, i wasn't aware of it, hope it works out great for you.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By jadcx
      Skywatcher 80 ED DS-Pro outfit including matched flattener and motor focus. Now only £350
      This kit gives you a great introduction to astronomy and imaging, which is why it's so popular.  You can see details over at FLO but there is:
      80 ED Ds-Pro OTA (Objective Lens Diameter: 80mm, Telescope Focal Length: 600mm,  f/7.5)
      SW Eyepiece (2"): 28mm
      2”/50.8mm Di-Electric Star Diagonal
      9x50 Finderscope
      Dual-Speed 11:1 2” Crayford Focuser (Backlash-Free)
      Supplied with Tube Rings & Mounting Plate - please note there is a longer black vixen type dovetail fitted, not the fancy new green short one you will see on the FLO site
      SW motor focus and fitting kit - I've never used this, hence it's not fitted (more details over on FLO)
      Dedicated SW 0.85x reducer/flattener (see FLO for more details)
      Aluminium Carrying / Shipping Case
       
      The RRP is over £720, so grab a bargain while you can.
      Collection from Nottingham, or DHL for £20 (within UK)



    • By sonnymoon
      It's an ED80 with the stock focuser. I think there is some astigmatism somewhere as my stars can be a little stretched and so I want to see if I can use a collimating laser to check if the focuser is in straight. (I'm also going to make a determined effort to get the spacing right between the FF//FR and the sensor, but that's another story). I can't see any threads that get into the detail of lining up the focuser with a laser. 
      If I put the laser in with the target bit facing up, then the red dot that bounces back off of the lens is slightly off centre on the target on the collimator. If I loosen the screws, turn through 90deg, retighten and look again, then the red dot is in a different place and so on all the way through 360 deg. I'm thinking that the red dot should be central (as when collimating a Dob that I used to have). Is that right?
      It may be that the laser needs collimating, but I'm not sure how to do that.
      Any advice on whether this approach is going to get me anywhere would be appreciated.
       
    • By tooth_dr
      I scrapped all the Oiii and Sii data I previously took during a full moon (about 15 hours worth) and retook it all when the moon was a bit smaller at 76%.  Ha was taken during 98% and 67% moon.  All the lights were taken on the following nights: 12th, 19th and 20th September 2019.
      Integration times, all in 600s subs unbinned:
      Ha = 28.33 hours
      Oiii= = 5.67 hours
      Sii = 5.67 hours
       
      The Ha data is really nice, and unsurprisingly the Oiii and Sii is not as strong (or nice).
      I'm missing that (vital) step in my processing routine of getting the Sii and Oiii properly stretched to match the Ha, before combining.  I dont really know how to deal with the weaker data properly.  Any pointers would be appreciated.
      What I do currently:
      All the data is loaded into APP into separate channels/sessions.
      The data is stacked and registered against the best Ha sub
      This produces individual stacks of Ha, Sii and Oiii that are all registered
      Each channel is processed with DPP in APP and then saved as a 16bit TIFF
      Each is opened in PS
      Stars removed with AA and any remnants removed and tidied up
      I then open a blank RGB document in PS
      I paste Ha into Green, Sii into Red and Oiii into Blue
      Adjust the selective colour settings to get 'Hubble palette'
      Adjust levels, curves, saturation until looks ok
      All the Ha Sii Oiii data is then combined together in a single 'super' stack in APP using quality weighted algorithm to create a 'luminance'
      That luminance layer is adjusted using levels, curves, and NC tools such as local contrast enhancement and deep space noise reduction (using masks to apply as required)
      The luminance is pasted onto the above colour layer, and incrementally added using gaussian blur
      Cropped and saved.
       
       
      Here it is anyway   I haven't intended on any more exposure time for this one, but will consider it, if the expert opinion dictates otherwise!
       
      CS
      Adam
       


    • By GiovanniF
      Hi to everyone, I used to do some astrophotography in the past with a Celestron AVX and DSLR but after few month had to give up for several reasons, including light pollution (I'm living in zone 3 east London), and also working shifts. Now I want to start again, and this time more serious. I've been searching around for a couple of months to choose all the gear and I'm quite happy with the list so far although it's a bit over the price I planned at first.
       I will get an William optics Z73 with his 50mm guide scope, a flattener/reducer 0.8, light pollution filter IDAS D2 and as camera I will use a Canon 600D modded and I will buy a ZWO 183MC Pro, after so much research, I'm very happy with the scale and framing I will get with this combo, but I'm starting to get confused with the mount.
      My first idea was to go for an HEQ5 Pro, as my previous experience with the AVX has been awful, then I realized that the FLO, sells that mount with belt modification and also some cleaning and tuning if required, I heard that it's a big improvement over the stock one and the price it's ok, but another important factor for me it's portability. Unfortunately, my garden doesn't allow me to do much so I will need to carry around on trolley, for a km walk, I'm a strong person and been doing plenty of time with the AVX, so my confusion came recently when the iOptron mounts entered my radar. I start comparing the heq5 pro with belt, with the iOptron cem25EC and the CEM40 without encoders, and I'm so unsure of which to buy, the cem25 seem to be the equivalent of heq5 at least speaking of payload, but in some threads I read people saying it's a bit fragile so kind of remove it from the equation although the weight it's interesting for my situation, then the cem40, seem to be quite similar on weight to the heq5 but with higher payload and that's interesting too as I will buy a C11 at some point.
      Now it will all come down to the accuracy of tracking I guess, how the heq5 and cem40 would compare on tracking and guiding? If the cem40 it's better, I would probably go with that since it holds more and would last longer as I don't plan to get anything bigger than a C11, but if the skywatcher it's better, I could decide to go for that, and when I move to a place with better garden then get a second mount with higher payload.
      Apologise for the long post and my english.
      Kind Regards,
      Giovanni. 
    • By ICR_2019
      Hi All
      I thought I would share how I fixed my sloppy rack and pinion focuser on Skywatcher 130p.
      The issue? When using or collimating the slop in the focuser would put the target or centre dot way out of line.
      With the tube tilted downward I removed the 4 screws/nuts  of the focuser to remove it from the OTA.
      Loosen the lock  and 2 adjusting screws, I used a small torx screwdriver as i did't have an allen key small enough.
      Remove the 4 screws holding the adjuster bar in place, and remove the adjuster.
      Note: Be careful to avoid the very sticky grease used on the drive!
      Remove the draw tube assembly, remove the lock/adjusting shim located at the top of the main body.
      There were 2 plastic shims 1 each side of the drive I removed both of them.
       Thoroughly clean everything with degreaser and isopropyl alcohol except the drive itself.
      I cut 2 plastic shims from food packaging, cleaned them, and using 50mm double sided tape I lined out the main focuser body. Be careful to cut to the correct size and shape before installing and don't cover the drive or lock/adjusting shim areas.
      Next using teflon tape purchased from eBay I covered the draw tube exterior.
      I then did the same covering the plastic shims in the main body.
      It was still a little loose so I doubled the teflon tape at the top of the tube either side of the adjusting shim.
      Next I added a plastic shim onto the adjuster shim and covered with teflon tape.
      Put it all back together and almost no slack!
      I can now move the focuser from fully in to fully out without the collomation moving out of the centre ring on the primary.
      Complete success I think.
       
       
       
       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.