Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

Sign in to follow this  
Xiga

Veil Nebula Mosaic - 17 Hrs of Ha and Oiii

Recommended Posts

Hi guys

After processing the Eastern & Wastern Veils separately a couple of months back, I've finally got round to doing the mosaic that was always the end goal (hence the framing of each panel). I'm not sure why I waited so long to do it, I think deep-down I was secretly dreading it really, as this is my first mosaic so I wasn't really sure how it would go.

So this is just 2 panels, and each one has 5 hrs of Ha (15 x 1200s), with 3 hrs 20 mins of Oiii in one (10 x 1200s) and 3 hrs 40 mins of Oiii (11 x 1200s) in the other. So 17 hrs in total.

APP was used for stacking, gradient reduction, and the mosaic creation. PS used for everything else.

Ha assigned to Red, Oiii to Blue, and Green was synthesized from one of Carboni's actions.

I've tried to push it as far as I dare to, did I over-do it do you think? I've resized it down to 66% to help hide some of the noise, and being a mosaic it's still plenty big. I might even end up bringing it down to 50%, we'll see.

C&C welcome as always. I tend to finish my images very late at night, so I can sometimes fall into the trap of not seeing the image as clearly as I should! So feel free to be as harsh as you like ?

 

Veil Nebula Mosaic.jpg

  • Like 16

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's wonderful. ?

Not over done at all. Worth leaving an image sit when you think you're done and come back fresh eyed.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A stunner Ciaran.  The framing is excellent and processing top notch.  Can I ask, did SGP help with the mosaic framing?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I too tend to process late at night and probably post too early, I should look at them again in the cold light of day.

However, I  cannot be harsh with this image, it’s  beautifully framed, and on the the scale you chosen there is nice crisp detail and good colour balance.

I would love to have a go at imaging the entire Veil like this, but it would be a 16 panel mosaic with my set up.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Allinthehead said:

That's wonderful. ?

Not over done at all. Worth leaving an image sit when you think you're done and come back fresh eyed.

Thanks Richard. And good advice. Advice I should heed more often than I do, lol 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, RichLD said:

Wonderful image, well done!

 

2 hours ago, tomato said:

I too tend to process late at night and probably post too early, I should look at them again in the cold light of day.

However, I  cannot be harsh with this image, it’s  beautifully framed, and on the the scale you chosen there is nice crisp detail and good colour balance.

I would love to have a go at imaging the entire Veil like this, but it would be a 16 panel mosaic with my set up.

Thanks guys ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, tooth_dr said:

A stunner Ciaran.  The framing is excellent and processing top notch.  Can I ask, did SGP help with the mosaic framing?

Thank you Adam. 

Oh boy does SGP help with mosaics! It's so simple. It shows you the sky view of the target and all you do is draw a rectangle over the area you want to capture. It then converts them into the right no. of tiles for you. Each tile then shows up as it's own target, which can be platesolved and rotated to on any given night. As you can see from my one above, I didn't have much room for error on either side. And even though it took me 4 nights to capture the frames, there was very little lost data near the edges. 

You don't even need a fancy rotator. SGP tells you how many degrees to rotate your focuser. It usually only takes me about 5 minutes to get within about 0.5 degrees accuracy. It's worth every penny! 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cracking work with you Ciaran.The  structure and the colour is out standing with you.Mark

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By dunners19871
      Hi all,
      I am hoping someone might be able to help with a possible way to shoot dark and bias frames on a DSLR (canon 700D) without the need to cover the scope  or camera, ideally using APT scripts 
       
      My thinking is that the camera, has a noise reduction mode where it will take the light shot, then with the shutter closed it will take a dark frame and subtract it from the light. So could you take a series of dark frames on ATP and lock the shutter down?
       
      If anyone knows I would love to know. Would be great to automate the lights, park the scope and have it run darks and bias, without the need to go out to it and cap up at 3.-4 in the morn 
       
      Thanks 
       
      Matt 
       
      @astro_pics_uk
    • By grievous
      Hello! I have a question on how can I mount my camera to my Sky-Watcher Starquest 130P telescope? I’ve watched so many videos about it and there’s so many different answers on what I need to do that. At the moment, I have 2x Barlow lens and a DSLR. I know that a T-ring is also necessary but is there anything more? Any help is highly appreciated, thanks! (I’m really new to telescopes and astrophotography in general so I hope I don’t say anything dumb)
    • By beka
      Hi All,
      Having had to move to an apartment where I could not use my CPC 1100, I decided that I have to see what I could do with my NexStar SLT 102 (alt-az achromatic 102mm f6.47 refractor). Setting up on my narrow balcony was challenging and the altitude bearing was so loose that it almost moved from the weight of the Canon 700D. I could not see M31 in the estimated 3.5 magnitude sky so I did a two star alignment and used the live-view to focus on a bright star. I then took a 15 second exposure after slewing to M31 which allowed me to see that I had it in the field of view. After a few more 15 second exposures and playing with the motion controls I managed to get it centered. The resulting picture is from 39 subs of 30 seconds at ISO 1600, 9 flats. The images were stacked and stretched with Siril and then I played with the curves on Gimp, cropped and scaled. Not too unhappy.
       

    • By astrosathya
      Just thought i'll bring this up as a point of discussion. Today, cooled CMOS Astro Cameras are available in plenty. QHY, ZWO and other variants of the same camera are selling for very reasonable prices. However, there was a point of time when astrophotographers used to cool down their DSLR's as a cheap OSC alternative to CCD cameras. Give a choice, I would've purchased a dedicated CMOS OSC which can cool to 40 C below ambient, but since I had a Canon 500D which I had self modded, I requested a friend Kaustav Chatterjee (an avid model railroader) to cold mod my 500D (he had cold modded his 1000D long back). This newly modded camera has a TEC12703 single peltier and cools to approximately 20 below ambient.What do you guys think?




    • By lux eterna
      Hi all,
      This is 6 hours (30 x 12 min), taken with my modded Nikon D7000 @iso200 and Astronomik 12 nm Ha 2" filter on Meade LX200-ACF with reducer (=1600 mm FL @ F8). Guided with NexGuide on HEQ5 Pro.
      The plan was to do a Ha O3 bicolour on this target, but the O3 may be a future thing due to weather conditions.
      I usually remove the stars during part of my processing workflow and put them back later on, but this time I think the nebulosity and dust came out best without them. I did however try to find out which stars belong to Melotte 15 and include only those, just to portrait the Melotte 15 without anything between it and us, but I could not find that info.
      Processed with DSS, Starnet and PS.
      Ragnar

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.