Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_globular_clusters_winners.thumb.jpg.13b743f39f721323cb5d76f07724c489.jpg

Recommended Posts

I'm looking at upgrading my manfrotto tripod to  something far sturdier and taller.

I'm 6f3" so ideally having a tall tripod makes life easier as long as it doesn't get blown about by the wind. 

I've heard the eq6 is a good shout but perhaps a little on the short side, but or the manfrotto 055 potentially still wobbly, or vixen porta ii. 

I'd like to spend less than £60, but is that realistic? 

What do you use or recommend? 

Thanks 

Leon 

Edited by Leon-Fleet

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Look for a good condition, used Bogen (Manfrotto) 3068/3268 (117/117B), 3058/3258 (161/161B) or 3051/3251 (058/058B) tripod.  All are very sturdy and able to support 40+ pounds and can be extended high enough for a 6+ footer to use comfortably.  I picked one up from Craigslist and another from ebay for $100 to $150 each.

I like the adjustable leg spreaders so I can get them down lower for seated usage.  The geared column is nice to raise the eyepiece upward when viewing near zenith.

I highly recommend vibration suppression pads because these tripods being all metal vibrate after touching the scope or mount without some sort of dampener.  I use pads cut from new old stock Sorbothane insoles from the 80s/90s that I picked up for cheap on ebay.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 20 November 2018 at 13:00, Davey-T said:

I'm using one of these ATM, quite high and solid, you may find a second hand one for under £60.00

Dave

https://www.firstlightoptics.com/tripods/horizon-8115-2-way-heavy-duty-tripod.html

Have had one these for years, very stable and tall. Locking knobs a bit fiddly though and the QR plate release knob eventually broke, but is still manageable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Ceramus said:

Have had one these for years, very stable and tall. Locking knobs a bit fiddly though and the QR plate release knob eventually broke, but is still manageable.

You remove the top and only use the legs for the SWSA.

Dave

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll be using the tripod for a newly-acquired AZ-GTi head, so top comes off but will need to get a 1/4" female to 3/4" male thread adaptor in order to screw the AZ-GTi on to the tripod legs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Ceramus said:

I'll be using the tripod for a newly-acquired AZ-GTi head, so top comes off but will need to get a 1/4" female to 3/4" male thread adaptor in order to screw the AZ-GTi on to the tripod legs.

I couldn't find the load spec for that tripod.  It looks to be in the sub-20 pound range.  If so, what is the maximum weight of the head, scope, diagonal, and eyepiece you'll be using?  My dual scope alt-az setup comes in at around 30 pounds without the tripod.  My Manfrotto 055 wasn't up to the task of handling that much weight with a 20 pound rating, thus my move up to the ones I listed above.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 23 November 2018 at 21:37, Louis D said:

I couldn't find the load spec for that tripod.  It looks to be in the sub-20 pound range.  If so, what is the maximum weight of the head, scope, diagonal, and eyepiece you'll be using?  My dual scope alt-az setup comes in at around 30 pounds without the tripod.  My Manfrotto 055 wasn't up to the task of handling that much weight with a 20 pound rating, thus my move up to the ones I listed above.

The Az Gti head is about 1.8 kg with batteries and the Heritage 130p around 3.5 with eyepiece, so I think within load capacity of the tripod if not fully extended. Will only be used visually.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By MikeGH
      Hello,
      I have a 4 year old Skywatcher NEQ6 mount that I control with a Synscan hand controller.  Recently I have had trouble with the goto command not slewing to and finding the targets despite properly following polar alignment with polar scope followed by 2 or 3 star alignment.  I have eliminated cone error, so do not think this is the cause.  The RA and DEC motors run smoothly with not much noise.  In attempting to understand the cause I noticed that if via the hand controller I slew the telescope by 12 hours in RA; the setting circle indicates that the telescope has slewed by 12 hours 20 minutes, which I can imagine could be a possible cause.
      Does anyone know if it is possible to perform some sort of re-calibration of the Synscan hand controller to adjust the slewing so that it corresponds with the actual physical movement around the RA axis.  I cannot see anywhere how to do this or why it may be out of calibration.
      Thanks very much for any advice.
      Regards,
      Mike (SW France, equipped with Celestron C11)
       
    • By Zadoq
      Hi,
      I've tried to research this, but really struggled because of the amount of choice available in that area. We're looking for a really good tripod to use for imaging with a Canon 5D mark iv, Skywatcher Adventurer and a series of DSLR lenses from 12mm to 200mm focal length. We might be tempted going for a heavier scope later on depending on the success we get with our current equipment, so it's worth bearing that in mind regarding upgradability.
      We are going to travel to Abisko by plane and we are going to carry the kit around while trekking (hence the Adventurer rather than a full size mount), so weight is important but we're not necessarily looking for the lightest tripod: something around 10kg or more would definitely be too heavy, but something around 3kg would still be acceptable, although lighter is better. However stability is really the most important feature we're looking for.
      Subjectively, I'm quite keen on a spread stopper because I think it would make the structure more sturdy, but if a tripod is renowned for being stiff and sturdy without a spread stopper, then that's probably good enough.
      I'm also quite keen on being able to fit a levelling bowl such as Manfrotto 500BALL 100mm Bowl with Knob in order to be able to use a large round spirit level for easier and more accurate levelling, as I want the polar alignment to be as good as possible in order to attempt imaging with lenses of 200mm and maybe a little bit more.
      Because of this and in order to minimise flex, I would prefer a tripod that can house a levelling bowl directly instead of a standard tripod with a central column to which a levelling head would have to be attached. The logic I have there is that I think it makes sense to minimise the number elements and connections as they introduce flex.
      Budget wise, we're not made of money but we'll get what we need to get: we don't want the tripod to be the weakest link.
      While we're at it, advice on a good tripod head (between the Adventurer and camera, e.g. for time lapses) would also be appreciated. I've read that a geared head was probably the best option there (again, we favour stability over anything else).
      Thanks in advance
    • By chris_33
      I am going to upgrade to the skywatcher 250/1200 pds telescope and i can't decide which mount i should get.
      The main (only) purpose is astrophtography and i am considering either the eq6-r- pro or the cem60
      The cem60 can carry more weight but is also more expensive, my inner debate now is about if it is worth it
      What's you take on it?
    • By Kronos831
      Hey guys! Its me again... I know what you are thinking 😛 there is not such thing as a cheap mount for astrophotography...and i agree with you! I just want to know if there are any significantly cheap mounts (under 100 pounds)  for my skywatcher heritage 130p that can give me maybe 15-30 sec exposure time max. Thanks
      Kronos
    • By KP82
      Is there a tripod extension tube that works on the SW EQ5/HEQ5 tripod and is shorter than 40cm/16" (the length of the stock SW tube)?
×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.