Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

glowingturnip

Eagle Nebula (M16) SHO

Recommended Posts

Here's my last one from my summer crop - it actually turned into a year-long project, I took the Ha in August 2017, the OIII in July this year and the SII in August.

LRGB_crop1_desat3.thumb.png.09e486cc47625507224fc2e463e3b3c1.png

 

LRGB_crop2.thumb.png.6211b13ee8e57ea743da4a38d3d3b28d.png

10 each x900s Ha, OIII and SII, darks flats and bias, equipment as per sig, taken in southern Spain, PI processing.

 

Just for fun, here's a side-by-side comparison of my Pillars of Creation vs Nasa's, can you guess which is which ?  

nasa_comparison.PNG.437e8c8c63cdb4930b686b3f912db6a1.PNG

Ok, not much of a contest really, but then their telescope is a bit more expensive than mine is !  Quite interesting to have a close look though, there are a number of features in common that I have managed to pick up that aren't apparent at first glance.

 

I'd be happy to receive feedback on what you think, feel free to be honest since I'm not quite sure how I feel about it, especially the colours.  Comments and cc welcome.

 

Hope you enjoy,

 

Stuart

 

[edited to fix Flickr link}

Edited by glowingturnip
  • Like 38

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That’s an incredible image. One to be really proud of. I love the Hubble comparison.

Barry

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Stuart,

I have no ability to critique your wonderful image. I love the side by side of your 'pillars' with hubble, what's not to like...

Cheers, Geof

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You have a very good image Stuart and your patience to collect has ensured a smooth image with a great level of detail.  It is framed well and there are no residual gradients - well done on a fine image.

For constructive feedback to enhance an already very good image, I do wonder if you tried to deconvolve the Ha data?  I think this would help with star control and to tighten up small scale detail?  A touch os star reduction would also be of benefit in helping concentrate the viewers. Equally this target can withstand a little more colour which ideally wouyld come from a longer integartion, however, PI's curves or colour saturation combined with a colour mask will help give some greater depth.

HTH.

Barry

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks all for the great remarks  ?

 

@Barry, thanks very much for your comments, some things there to think about.

Regarding the colour, getting the balance right was my big concern, but actually I had the opposite problem to not enough - the colours I had coming through during the final stretches and whatnot were very strong even without any enhancement, so that to my tastes it was coming across as a little garish, a little 'Disney'.   So actually my final act was to de-saturate it a little bit (I know, a first for me !), but looking at it again with fresh eyes this evening I wonder if I've gone a little too pastel.

I'll put it to the vote, do you prefer...

Full Disney: 

LRGB_crop1_disney.thumb.png.c8bf725eaeaf5f52b8b0378418461024.png

 

or pastel shades:

LRGB_crop1_desat3.thumb.png.972ec122bfbb42efa621d4fe01a6b04b.png

Probably somewhere in-between I guess.

 

Re the star sizes, I did think about applying some (the Morph transform is a great tool), but in the end figured I'd keep it as it was, I wanted to convey something of the open cluster in the middle.  The stars are actually from the Ha only - the OIII and SII stars were much more bloated, especially with the strong stretch on the SII, but I merged them with the tonemap method.

Deconvolution yes, I did it on all three channels actually, though it didn't add much to the OIII and SII.

 

Cheers,

Stuart

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent image Stuart what a lot of hard work.  I think half way between colours.

Carole 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your 'full Disney' does look a little red, so you could try adjusting the histogram, selcting the red channel.  Or create a blend of the two images using Pixelmath.  Colour Masks are very useful for isolating a specific colour for processing too.  NB data can w ithstand a little more of a bold approach over and above LRGB imaging: afterall one is trying to show structure from the different emissions.

There is no practical benefit in deconvolving anything other than the Ha channel and even afterwards, depending on the subject and nebula details, you have the option of using MultiScaleLinearTransform and its 'Bias' settings to sharpen selectively and gently (using a nebula mask to protect stars and background sky).  Local Histogram Equalisation is also a great tool when used gently to tweak contrast and gain a sense of depth.

You have a great image Stuart and your tastes are what matter - I am just gently encouraging you to help you get the most from your data with going 'Full Disney'.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 17/11/2018 at 14:49, glowingturnip said:

Ok, not much of a contest really, but then their telescope is a bit more expensive than mine i

You say not that much of a contest but i say not that far away. That's astonishing what can be achieved with amateur equipment. Great image.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As someone who is a decade or two away from being able to do this, I like them both, but see why you chose to lighted up the colours a bit.  The top right 'quadrant' loses out a little in the pastel image as the detail is finer but the remainder of the image looks slightly better balanced.
That said, post either anywhere astrophotographers gather and you'll get nothing but praise ?

All the best

Michael

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Synchronicity said:

The top right 'quadrant' loses out a little in the pastel image as the detail is finer but the remainder of the image looks slightly better balanced.

Actually that's a good point, yes that bar that leads off to the right goes from being finely tinted in the first image to looking like greyscale lum with not enough rgb behind it in the second.

I'll have another go, masking for only the most saturated bits and addressing the reds.  I think the blues can probably be allowed to stay. 

 

I'll be back  ?

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

it's been a busy week, but I finally got round to tweaking the colour on these - what do you think ?

LRGB_crop1_rydesat_bluesat_scnr.thumb.png.d6a79a48b3c7a6f9365292ba60d4f25a.png

 

LRGB_crop2_CTHT_rydesat_bsat_scnr.thumb.png.faf4e37c92f2956d0437dd017745e365.png

 

I came up with doing the idea of a ChannelExtract of the c channel (saturation) from Lch, blurring and stretching that to use as a saturation mask, then multiplying it by a red+yellow mask from the ColorMask script then doing specific red+yellow desaturation with the ColorSaturation tool.  I gave the blue a bit of a nudge higher too.  Quite like how it's taken the fizz out of the reddish areas but left the delicate areas with a nice tinge.

What do you think, am I on the right track ?

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just looking through SHO images as it's my next attempt. That's an amazing comparison to the Hubble image!! There's really not that much in it considering the kit you use versus Nasa's budget! If I got a result like that it would be a crowning achievement in my eyes! Fantastic, well done!???

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love this one! It´s one of those objects that are almost possible to image from my location but still not. I can do a few minutes of Ha in late summer but when it´s dark enough for the rest, it´s below my imaging view.

Really like your processing and as far as colours go, there really is no truth when it comes to narrowband combination, right? ?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's an amazing image.

I tried a bit of crude deconvolution on it to see if it would go a bit closer to the Hubble image, I hope you don't mind, but it suggests using deconvolution on your original data may well be worth doing:

eagle.thumb.png.ccb7761321929bdb8ca9236015f7ec4a.png

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, Stub Mandrel said:

That's an amazing image.

I tried a bit of crude deconvolution on it to see if it would go a bit closer to the Hubble image, I hope you don't mind, but it suggests using deconvolution on your original data may well be worth doing:

 

Wow, surprised you managed to make such a difference ! 

I did deconvolve all three channels as a very first step, but didn't get it making that much of a difference.  Maybe I should have another go - mind you, I'm not sure I want to go through all the processing steps again, it did take ages !  Although I suppose I only have to do it for the lum...

Mind sharing what deconv settings you used ?  Obviously they'd be different for the raw linear data.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, glowingturnip said:

Mind sharing what deconv settings you used ?

It does seem to have 'crisped it up' nicely, although I can't see extra detail.

I use Astra Image.

I used my rough 'base' settings which I generally use first before 'tuning':

Deconvolution for sharpening, Lucy-Richardson, Lorentzian, 10 iterations, blur kernel about 1.6, deconvolution strength about 1.5,  aggressive and reduce haloes not checked.

My temptation would be to create a mono version, deconvolute it, then add it over your best colour version as a luminance layer and play with the opacity to get teh best result - that minimises any extra processing and keeps the fine tuning of colour you have done.

Edited by Stub Mandrel
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By stevebb
      Bit of a longshot, does anyone have a Primaluce Eagle 3 + cables going for sale. I am toying between this option or an Intel NUC/Pegasus Pocket Powerbox to automate my observatory.

      Thanks in advance and a Happy New Year.

      Steve
      MIG Observatory
    • By GDS
      I’m trying to find indication (shareable evidence) of when the first telescopic photo of the Pillars Of Creation was produced.  Can anyone point me in the right direction?
    • By coatesg
      Managed a bit of further processing on data captured on holiday - this field of view is something I would really struggle with at home (it's 9 degrees lower, and doesn't rise above my roof from my garden!) - a widefield of the Eagle (M16), Swan/Omega (M17) and M18, as well as a lot of HII in the surrounding areas. The HA filter helped a lot in cutting through the atmosphere - it's not fantastically high from the site we were at, and I still had to have a couple of nights at it dodging the trees.
      Details:
      QHY163M + Canon 200mm f2.8L (@f3.85) + Baader 7nm HA filter, mounted on a Losmandy GM8.
      Exposure 2h50m in 5min subs. Binned a few subs as they were of poor quality. 
      Processing in PI. Thanks for looking
      At 50% resolution:

      Partially annotated version (lots of unmarked catalogues not shown, and not sure why Sh2-47 is marked away from the actual object! :

       
    • By alexbb
      This came as a bonus target, I didn't really plan to shoot it, but I took the opportunity to grab some frames before astrodark or with the DSLR or waiting for other targets
      So this is a mix of everything:
      10x2min Ha with the ASI1600 and 130PDS on the AZ-EQ5.
      11x3min Ha with the ASI1600 and Esprit80 on the AZ-EQ5.
      19x5min Ha with the ASI1600 and Esprit80, 11 on the AZ-EQ5, 8 on the EQ6-R.
      15x5min Oiii with the ASI1600 and Esprit80 on the AZ-EQ5.
      74x90s with the DSLR and 130PDS on the AZ-EQ5.
      For a total of 5:34h.
      Crop of RGB, HOO and HOO-RGB.
      Which are your thoughts before I call it the final version?
      Clear skies!
      Alex
       



      Edit, final:

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.