Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.


Help please

Best eyepiece for saturn PS127eq

Recommended Posts

27 minutes ago, Help please said:

I need help i want to see Saturn clearly with my POWERSEEKER 127EQ TELESCOPE.


An 8mm is probably going to provide about as much magnification as that scope can provide. Unfortunately, previous reports suggest that it is best suited for low power viewing. 

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, that scope is a Bird-Jones (Jones-Bird?) design with an integrated 2x barlow/corrector.  This design as implemented doesn't generally do very well at high powers.  A much better option than spending big bucks on high end planetary eyepieces for it would be to get a good condition, used, 6" or 8" Dob.  The difference in detail, contrast, and clarity will be very noticeable.

  • Like 3

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites


I had the same telescope, it was my first( bought second hand) but  turned out not the best for my needs, although it gave me my first real view of the Moon.

I struggled to see Jupiter  clearly with it, and after a thorough rebuild, clean, and better eyepieces, it was still no better visually? 

Most often mainly down to the poor seeing conditions but also the limitation that this scope imposes, and for just visual observation, there's a lot of faffing around with locks and controls in order  to view the next target. 

I would imagine under pristine skies, its possible to see the planets, but don't go wild buying expensive eyepieces thinking it will make this scope any better, it won't. If you find the right eyepiece, one that allows you to see your object more comfortably, with respect to the field of view and eye relief, the scope itself will still limit what you'll see.

If you still have the two supplied eyepieces, try the 25mm eyepiece with Barlow, although the supplied Barlow was I believe, x3, which is still too much. A x2 Barlow would work better on the 25mm, just to see how  (give an idea ) a  12mm would view the target, but 8mm is about as  short a focal length that the scope can handle without degrading performance even further.

Trial and error for now, but if/when you look through another scope, hopefully my thoughts and reasoning  here will may make more sense once the difference has been discovered. For me there's no comparison between what I had to what I have now.

Like I said, good for the moon, once correctly setup and orientated, and works ok overland during the day, but ...............I'll stop now!


Edited by Charic
  • Like 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

 Louis D was quicker than me, I could have saved some text here? 

  • Haha 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Charic said:

 Louis D was quicker than me, I could have saved some text here? 

I wish there was a way to put out a PSA (Public Service Announcement) to warn new telescope buyers away from Jones-Bird design telescopes.  To misquote Nancy Reagan, "Just say NO to Jones-Bird type telescopes!".

I thought this Amazon review of this telescope was a very interesting read.  The author describes how he had to completely rework the scope just to collimate it.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

The best eyepiece might well be a new telescope (as noted above).

However, I note you pop the word 'clearly' into your OP - you might also find useful a look at this thread which might provide some idea of what 'clearly' could look like:


Even if you don't read all the text, scroll down and look at the pictures which are with a far more capable telescope than the one you have - it might be necessary to re-adjust what you think you should be able to see - it probably won't be the coloured images that may have been on the box the telescope was shipped in.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, Help please said:

Would a celestron astromaster 130eq be better. Than the powerseeker127eq.

Probably quite a bit better with a parabolic mirror and no corrector lens.  However, I would avoid the EQ mount, short focal ratio (f/5) and go with a long focal ratio (f/8), parabolic mirror 6" Dob instead if you want much improved planetary images.  The image will be steadier due to the more stable mount and you'll gain a 2" focuser so you can still get wide fields of view despite the longer focal length.  Something like the Sky-Watcher 6" f/8 Traditional Dobsonian Telescope for $285.  The longer focal ratio is also more gentle on eyepieces so you don't have to invest in high cost designs as much to get decent off-axis images.  The longer focal length also means you can achieve the same magnification with a longer focal length eyepiece that has better eye relief which mean greater viewing comfort.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Help please said:

would the 10 inch sky watcher dobsonian be better than the 6 inch

Is it a better telescope?  Yes.

Is it better for you? That's more complicated.  It has way more light gathering ability,  so can see fainter objects,  but it is bigger and heavier and thus less mobile, so it depends on you. If possible try and see one IRL and make an informed decision about if it will be best for you. 

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Help please said:

would the 10 inch sky watcher dobsonian be better than the 6 inch

I have a 10'' SW collapsible dob, and my first weapon of choice for observing

Use a 17mm wide-angle eyepiece for Saturn and Jupiter.

Fitting a 2 X barlow, you will experience what you viewing moving a lot faster

When doing presentation for schools, scout/guide groups, find the dob quick and easy to set up, and use a laser pointer, to locate where want to view

Another little trick

The hard plastic cover, has a 2'' removable cap

Sticky tape some Baader viewing film underside of the cover, and can use for solar viewing

For AP use ED80 on EQ5 mount



Skywatcher 10 inch Dobson.jpg

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, cletrac1922 said:

Sticky tape some Baader viewing film underside of the cover, and can use for solar viewing

Given that general purpose sticky tape tends to loosen over time and/or when heated I do not think that this solution sounds robust enough for a situation where a failure will result in instant blindness. I think there should also be some sort of mechanical clamp to prevent movement of the filter, as well as some method of protecting the filter from both sides when the tube cover is not on the telescope.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By floastro
      Hi all,
      This is my first shots of Saturn and Jupiter taken the last summer with my new ZWO ASI178MC.
      Equipment :
      -Sky-Watcher Maksutov-Cassegrain Ø150mm /1800mm
      -Sky-Watcher NEQ5 PRO Goto mount
      -ZWO ASI178MC camera
      -ZWO ADC corrector
      -Pierro-Astro electric Focuser Focus v2 controlled by the PC station in ASCOM.
      -Imaging Software : FireCapture
      -Integration Software : Autostakker 3
      -Processing Softwares : PRISM v10 / Registax 6 / PhotoShop CS6 / Lightroom 6
      - Wide Gammut Monitor for processing : NEC SpectraView Reference 272 (27") calibrated with x-Rite i1 Display Pro colorimeter
      Saturn :
      Sequence of 11,000 images.
      8,800 added with a sub-exposure of 88ms/image.
      Focal length : 1800mm

      Jupiter :
      Sequence of 6,000 images. 4,800 images added.
      The exposure time for each image : 40.7ms.
      Focal length : 1800mm



    • By ukuleledaveey
      Hello all,as a totak noobie and not just green behind thr ears but all over 🤣.
      Ive had my first scope for 7 days now a 2nd hand skywatcher 200p dob, i only have the 2 eye pieces that came with it.
      I decided to go out in the communal garden again tonight asbthe sky looked good,i got out at 8.30 to give the scope time to cool down and get muself comfy.
      It was a lovely fairly clear night.And for the first time i managed to get Saturn in my finder scope after finally sorting out its alignment on friday, i started off with tue 25mm eyepiece saturn was tiny but i could cleary make out the rings i was gob smacked so happy and excited i quickly fumbled for the 10mm eye piece and slipped that in a slight adjustment of the scope and saturn was slightly larger and the rings alot more visible wow wow wow i am still on cloud nine it was amazing,i looked at it and followed it for what felt like half an hour.my wife bought me a cup of tea and she had a look to and a couple of my neighbours were very impressed.
      I then waited for mars to move round and quickly focused on it and i started with the 25mm and then moved on to the 10mm.
      Before tonight i wasnt very impressed with the 10mm but it did a good job tonight.
      Im still buzzing and im off to bed now.
      Just thought i would share with all you wonderful people.
      Many thanks and best wishes From me
      Dave 🤠
    • By assasincz
      Imaged through my 12" newtonian and using a JAI machine-vision industrial camera I borrowed from work. After processing I noticed hints of altogether four Saturnian moons. Seeing was rather poor though.

    • By Cosmic Geoff
      For once I set up my two catadroptic imaging scopes together to see how they compared, and how well the smaller one cut through the crud.
      C8 SCT on SE mount, ASI 120MC, ADC, processed in Registax6, 3000 frame video.
      Celestron 127mm Mak on Nexstar SLT mount, wood tripod, ASI120MC , ADC, processed in Registax6, 3000 frame video.
      The 127mm images are slightly smaller, placed second.   The bigger scope seems to do better.  I thought that Saturn did not change much and was just a seeing test target, but the shadow of the planet on the rings is now distinctly asymmetrical.   The dark smudges in the C8 Mars images correlate well with real features.  Mars altitude about 11 deg. The dust storm seems to be over.
      The seeing was better than it's been for a while. 

    • By rorymultistorey
      Hi Stargazers,
      After a lot of work and help from the great Damian Peach I managed to get some really good images of Jupiter Mars and Saturn despite a total spend of just £100... and I made another bonkers Astrobiscuit video about it which I hope you enjoy. Mr Peach really helped me pick my nights to image and the other big surprise was how good the canon 600D is at planetary. All comments/ advice/ criticisms most welcome...


Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.