Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_30_second_exp_2_winners.thumb.jpg.b5430b40547c40d344fd4493776ab99f.jpg

lenscap

28BYJ-48 Stepper motor questions

Recommended Posts

I've completed fitting my DIY Onstep goto system to my 200p, EQ3-2. Works great. I'm delighted.

Onstep can also control electric focusers so that's my next project.

I want to use a 28BYJ-48 stepper motor because it's small , light & cheap & I've seen it used to drive focusers on the forum, (but indirect drive with pulleys or gears)

My focuser is the stock Skywatcher 2"/1.25" rack & pinion 1:1 . I want to use direct drive for simplicity & minimum cost.

      Has anyone direct driven this focuser with this motor? (Has it got enough torque?)

Since the motor is unipolar (and 5v) & Onstep only supports bipolar steppers I will be rewiring it to bipolar & running  it at 12volts.

     Does using the motor like this give the same torque , or double or half?

     Does it give the same step angle or double or half ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

About twice the torque, same step angle.  I've used it in bipolar mode as per my blog.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IMO a NEMA17 is overkill for focussing of small to medium telescopes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends on what weight you hang on the focuser.  I used a step down pulley or gearing system.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Gina said:

IMO a NEMA17 is overkill for focussing of small to medium telescopes.

Yes I would prefer the small motor if possible so that if something goes wrong it will probably just stall rather than destroy the focuser.

 

4 minutes ago, Gina said:

Depends on what weight you hang on the focuser.  I used a step down pulley or gearing system.

 I'm just visual so the max payload is a 32mm Plossl.

 I want to avoid pulleys if I can, to maintain my reputation as a cheapskate.?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you really need remote focussing for visual?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My 200p is F/5. It is very difficult to nail the focus with the stock 1:1 manual focuser.

The critical focus distance is about 60 microns which equals a movement of about 0.3mm at the perimeter of the focus knob.

I should be able to get a resolution of about 6 microns with the BYJ if it works. 

Also since the mount is a bit shaky I should get less vibration  focusing with the phone app rather than manual.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They should be excellent at that price!!

  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use a 28BYJ48 / ULN2003 combo via rubber-band (Meccano motor belt drive pulley drilled out to fit the BYJ shaft, driven with the stock meccano rubber band) direct to the 10:1 fine focus knob of my 200PDS. Works brilliantly. Tie wrap round the end of the knob to stop the band slipping off. Not enough torque to drive the coarse focus knob via rubber-band without slip, but would probably do so via belt or direct drive. As it’s rubber-band drive, it just slips when it hits the stops and has no chance of causing any damage, but has plenty of grip to shunt my DSLR about / hold in position.

Gives me around 110,000 steps from full in to full out, so rather fine control, but this gets translated down 4:1 step range for use with TekkyDave’s Ascom driver & APT (one of which doesn’t support the native step range - can’t recall offhand which). Motor is mounted via Meccano to a spare scope ring, onto the camera thread. Entire thing is driven by a Raspberry Pi 1 model B running node-red to translate the serial protocol of TekkyDave’s driver to the simple bash commands to drive the motors.

As it’s such a cheap n’ cheerful (sub £30 in total) chuck-on-and-go solution, I never bothered thinking about step angles and torque etc... just threw it together and tried it for giggles, and it worked, so I stuck with it *shrug*. 

20988580_10155714878236757_3686119052933732818_o-2.thumb.jpg.471c003ecde1eb062e13ae218f007a1b.jpg

https://apatchworkboy.com/projects/2016/project-pifocus/

Edited by Marci
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Love it!  I've used ordinary elastic bands as supplied by the postman wrapped round post items.  For the 1:1 (only) focuser on my MN190 I used a timing belt and pulleys.  The 28BYJ-48 little stepper motor is quite adequate and oh so cheap.

Edited by Gina
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Brilliant design Marci. I love the use of Meccano. Wish I hadn't thrown mine away decades ago.

For the sake of science I've just measured the torque required by the (newly greased) SW 1:1 r&p focuser.

I wrapped some string around the focus knob and added 10gm oxo cubes till it turned smoothly.

It took 200gm which equates to a torque of 400gm.cm (5.6 oz.in) with a typical eyepiece.

Since the 28BYJ-48 should be good for about 10 oz.in in bipolar mode I'll go with that, direct drive.

Since Onstep includes focus control software I will only need the motor, bracket, cable & a drv8825 driver so the cost should be less than £10!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.