Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_inspirational_skies_winners.thumb.jpg.94f78e21c195e385c5621d89ea0b51b9.jpg

Astrofriend

A medium format lens on a Canon full frame

Recommended Posts

Long time ago I bought a Pentax medium format lens. It's a Pentax SMC 67 165 mm f/2.8. The reason I bought this was to have as low vignetting as possible. Later I bought the Sigma APO 150 mm f/2,8. Very good but a bit high vignetting.

After this the Pentax have collected a lot of dust. But why not give it one more chance?

Here you can see some graphs over the vignetting where I compare the Sigma with the Pentax:
http://www.astrofriend.eu/astronomy/projects/project-sigma-pentax-vignetting/project-sigma-vs-pentax.html

Later I shall also do some test how sharp it is, now with a live view camera it's much easier to get it in perfect focus, I think I failed with this earlier.

Any other out there using medium format lenses (for astro)?

/Lars

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was very curious to test my medium format Pentax 67 lens on an astronomy object. I couldn't wait until I got a clear sky and performed this test at the balcony without polar align. Very light polluted sky.

Here is the simple analyze I did:
http://www.astrofriend.eu/astronomy/projects/project-pentax67-test/project-test-pentax67-lens.html

I must say that it perform better than expected. It's a bit exiting with this medium format lens and I will later spend a night on some astronomy object at a place with darkness.

/Lars

Edited by Astrofriend

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pentax 67 lenses are the way to go for widefield astro and mono camera because if the long back focus and the sharp optics, especially since we only use the centers, I have a selection that I use with a full frame astro CCD:

 

50mm f4:

cygnus-wide-sub.thumb.jpg.b9383d708f0fdbce263e4a76b031ab2d.jpg

 

300 mm f4

post-6754-0-64788400-1423659654_thumb.jpg

 

Huw

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very nice Huw :thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,
Last night we got a a clear sky, at least I thought so. My friend invited me to follow him out to a dark place outside the city. My plan was to test my medium format lens on a object that I also have taken photos of with my more modern APO lens. We started about 7 pm. We have winter now and it's dark already at this time. As usually we got clouds drifting in over us. Still we could doing some astrophotographing but not very high quality of the images.

Anyway I have the photos here, both my old Pentax 67 medium format 165mm f/2.8 lens and the Sigma APO 150mm f/2.8 lens:
http://www.astrofriend.eu/astronomy/my-astronomy-photo/open-clusters/m45-open-cluster.html

The stars bleading over, the red and blue doesn't focus at the same place as the green wavelength as espected. The advantage of the old lens is that I can use it at f/2.8 compare to the APO which I set the aperture to f/4.0. I use these settings most to get the vignetting under control. But of course even the sharpness got better.

What I miss most is the focus motor that I have in my Canon lenses. Now when get used to control the camera (Canon 6D) over the smartphone I have found it very convinient.

One more thing I tested this evening was the new angled finder I bought to the Star Adventurer mount. What a difference, now I can place the polar star exact where I want it. Almost impossible to see throught the polar scope normally when living at +/-60 degree latitude. Even the red light lamp I have worked well. But need another holder for it.

I will post more about this later on my homepage.

/Lars

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I did a new page where I did a crop out of the extrem corner from both the Pentax photo and the Sigma photo of M45. Very interesting to see that the Pentax isn't very bad even if it have colored rings around the bright stars. Or maybe it's only what I feel because I'm not used to have any good astro photos from where I live in city. Thee photos are from a full frame sensor with almost no crop at the edges.

Here are the photos I compare:

http://www.astrofriend.eu/astronomy/projects/project-sigma-pentax-vignetting/08-project-sigma-vs-pentax.html

Now just waiting for a clear sky.

 

/Lars

Edited by Astrofriend

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By johngwheeler
      I've been struggling to find an answer to whether a 2.5" focuser is likely to cause vignetting on a full-frame (36x24mm) camera sensor.
      This would be for an f/7 130mm scope, probably used in conjunction with a 3" 0.79x focal reducer (stated to have an illuminated image circle of 45mm).
      Whilst the focal reducer should fully illuminate the sensor (having an M68 connector on the scope side and M48 on the camera side), it is not clear whether any "mechanical" vignetting might occur with a 2.5" focuser drawtube. 
      I imagine this would depend on the backfocus of the scope - i.e. how far the focal plane is behind the end of the focuser.  If it's a long way back, I can visualize the light cone potentially being restricted when it enters the drawtube inside the OTA. Hopefully, the scope isn't designed this way, but it's hard to tell.
      If there is no mechanical vignetting, it does raise the question of what the benefits of larger focusers are. Greater load capacity certainly; improved stability? maybe. But does it actually give a wider unvignetted image circle?
      I'd like to apply some science to this question, rather than buying a bigger focuser "just in case"!
       
      Thanks for any answers!
      John.
    • By jambouk
      Are there any advantages of using a 2" diagonal with a 1.25" eye piece vs a 1.25" diagonal and 1.25" EP, assuming both are of similar build quality?
      [Someone asked me this and I gave them my answer, but I wonder what others think].
      James
       
    • By Nightfly
      Greetings SGL members.
      It has been some time since I have posted any new film images. It is true that I have been having a fling with a mistress named DSLR, but my heart is in these images done in the way I learned thirty years ago.
      My last imaging session according to my Log book was October 11, 2012. I had just finished a roll of Superia that night and I almost never returned. I began experimenting with digital. It was fun and productive but I missed my old film images. I was delayed further about one year ago. Without warning I suffered a severe heart attack. It was quite the scene. I was a goner for sure if not for the help of some cracker jack EMT's that kept CPR going. I was gone for over 15 minutes. The ER got me back and the chopper flight to an emergency heart catheterization lab placed a stent and after several months of rehab I am back and good as new!
      I had one great session in late June. For several back-to-back nights the weather cooperated enough to image with a new lens and I wanted to share with you all.
      The images below are taken with the Pentax 67 and the 400mm F/4 SMC Takumar lens. I used apertures of f/4.8 or f/5.6 for 40-50 minute exposures on Fuji Neopan Acros 100 black and white negative film.
      You can read about my project plan and inspiration here:
      http://nightflyphotography.blogspot.com/2014/07/recapturing-ee-barnards-legac...
      You can view the images and read about them here:
      http://nightflyphotography.blogspot.com/2014/07/selected-regions-of-milky-way...
      Here is a legend to the several images taken in June.
      Pictures at Eleven by Nightfly Photographic, on Flickr
      Below are some of the results.  These are preliminary images that were scanned rather hastily, but these results look promising.  I need to go back and remaster each image, something that will take me awhile.  A good task for winter when I am shut indoors. 
      Messier 24 Region by Nightfly Photographic, on Flickr
      Region of Dark Lanes in Ophiuchus by Nightfly Photographic, on Flickr
      The Southern Scutum Star Cloud by Nightfly Photographic, on Flickr
      The Dark Nebulae Around Theta Ophiuchi by Nightfly Photographic, on Flickr
      Apologies for the smaller sized image here:
      The Great Star Cloud in Scutum by Nightfly Photographic, on Flickr
      Messier 22 Region in Sagittarius by Nightfly Photographic, on Flickr
      The Great Sagittarius Star Cloud by Nightfly Photographic, on Flickr
      Thanks for looking.  I hope you enjoyed them.
      Jim
×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.