Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

stargazine_ep24_banner.thumb.jpg.56e65b9c9549c15ed3f06e146fc5f5f1.jpg

Ricker

Removing Amp Glow ZWO 178 colour cooled

Recommended Posts

I am imaging with a ZWO 178mc-cooled and am having trouble removing amp glow.  I am using darks in the same conditions as lights and stacking and imaging with SharpCap.  I am left with a image looking like below.  No matter what I do I seem to be always left with this residual amp glow signature,  Any ideas out there?

 

Rich

 

image.png.242336699810cc6c286cb55930b68ed8.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the tip but Amp glow is part of the dark signal.  The flat is a measure of sensitivity variation across the sensor.  So darks should be enough to remove it,.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to calibration my images with darks, flats and darkflats to fully remove the amp glow on my qhy183c. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What camera settings do you use? If you have the possibility to adjust camera offset/bias, take a look at that. With high gain, you need a larger offset to avoid clipping. What you see could be clipping in the red and blue channels, but not green.

Just a wild idea.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the uncooled version of this  camera and the same problem. 

 I tried Gain=200 and got what looked like a star shaped light leak in one corner just like yours. I also took flats & Bias frames, but they did not help much.  I assumed it was a problem with my scope, but found its was AMPGLOW, see this ZWO article.  

I tried taking 90 second Darks at various levels of Gain and found it diminished until it was virtually invisible at Gain=10 .  To see the effect take a Dark into your processing program and stretch it.

ZWOs solution is to control via Darks and disable any dark optimization feature of your calibration program eg DSS.  They say that this effect only occurs in "specialist" sensors and not in those used for DLSRs.  I was staggered, sounds like a design fault to me.  

These guidelines appeared in another ZWO post:

Unity Gain ==>    Gain: 180   Offset: 25
Highest Dynamic Range ==>   Gain:  0    Offset:  25
Lowest Read Noise ==>   Gain: 270   Offset:  340
 

So my interpretation is to go for Gain: 0   Offset: 25 for DSOs on long exposure and disable dark optimization. Waiting for moonless/cloudless night to try this out. Any other experiences most welcome.  Never had this problem with my trusty 450D.

 

 

Edited by maxchess

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, maxchess said:

I have the uncooled version of this  camera and the same problem. 

 I tried Gain=200 and got what looked like a star shaped light leak in one corner just like yours. I also took flats & Bias frames, but they did not help much.  I assumed it was a problem with my scope, but found its was AMPGLOW, see this ZWO article.  

I tried taking 90 second Darks at various levels of Gain and found it diminished until it was virtually invisible at Gain=10 .  To see the effect take a Dark into your processing program and stretch it.

ZWOs solution is to control via Darks and disable any dark optimization feature of your calibration program eg DSS.  They say that this effect only occurs in "specialist" sensors and not in those used for DLSRs.  I was staggered, sounds like a design fault to me.  

These guidelines appeared in another ZWO post:

Unity Gain ==>    Gain: 180   Offset: 25
Highest Dynamic Range ==>   Gain:  0    Offset:  25
Lowest Read Noise ==>   Gain: 270   Offset:  340
 

So my interpretation is to go for Gain: 0   Offset: 25 for DSOs on long exposure and disable dark optimization. Waiting for moonless/cloudless night to try this out. Any other experiences most welcome.  Never had this problem with my trusty 450D.

 

 

Are you sure these are correct values?

For 178 model, there is no unity gain setting, since all gain values are below unity - full well of this camera is 15K and ADC is 14bit - meaning 0-16383, so at gain 0 you are still not at unity - a bit below, something like ~0.93e/ADU.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To be safe I am trying some captures at Gain=10 , Offset=10 on M81, (20 x 120 secs) but with a full moon they are likely to be poor. M81 is about as far away as I can get from the Moon.  However lights so far are showing minimal Amp Glow. Hopefully with Darks, Lights  & Bias I can eliminate it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, maxchess said:

To be safe I am trying some captures at Gain=10 , Offset=10 on M81, (20 x 120 secs) but with a full moon they are likely to be poor. M81 is about as far away as I can get from the Moon.  However lights so far are showing minimal Amp Glow. Hopefully with Darks, Lights  & Bias I can eliminate it.

No need for bias. Most CMOS sensors have one issue or another with bias. You will need lights (obviously :D ), matching darks, flats and darks that match flats.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

13 hours ago, vlaiv said:

Are you sure these are correct values?

For 178 model, there is no unity gain setting, since all gain values are below unity - full well of this camera is 15K and ADC is 14bit - meaning 0-16383, so at gain 0 you are still not at unity - a bit below, something like ~0.93e/ADU.

This is the article that gives the example settings for long exposures.  It is a different sensor, but the principal seems to be that for Highest Dynamic Range on long exposures you set gain to 0, offset 10.  In the example they have unitary gain as (G: 139 O: 21). So I assume that G=0 maximizes well depth and offset 10 lifts the lower values.

In my simplistic way of thinking I assume that with G=0, O=10  I can usefully increase exposures until the highlights reach saturation, at which point I am getting the best dynamic range, ie making optimum use of the ADC to record the widest range of values in the most detail.

I notice from Astrobin that many ZWO camera users use large numbers of relatively short exposures 60-120 secs , rather than DLSR users who go for fewer much longer exposures.

Still struggling with this camera, will process last nights Moon affected images later. 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, maxchess said:

 

This is the article that gives the example settings for long exposures.  It is a different sensor, but the principal seems to be that for Highest Dynamic Range on long exposures you set gain to 0, offset 10.  In the example they have unitary gain as (G: 139 O: 21). So I assume that G=0 maximizes well depth and offset 10 lifts the lower values.

In my simplistic way of thinking I assume that with G=0, O=10  I can usefully increase exposures until the highlights reach saturation, at which point I am getting the best dynamic range, ie making optimum use of the ADC to record the widest range of values in the most detail.

I notice from Astrobin that many ZWO camera users use large numbers of relatively short exposures 60-120 secs , rather than DLSR users who go for fewer much longer exposures.

Still struggling with this camera, will process last nights Moon affected images later. 

 

 

With 178, use gain 0 if you want highest dynamic range, and that is ok (no quantization clipping will happen because even at gain 0 you are below unity for e/ADU vallue), but I would not use offset setting of other camera. There is really a simple way to test which offset value is good for your particular gain setting.

Just take your camera, set all other values (temperature, gain) and take few bias frames (or short darks, 1s or whatever). Examine histogram / pixel values of those bias frames - none of them should include lowest value possible. 178 is 14bit camera, so I would say you should not have pixels with value of 8 or less in your images. If you find such pixels - increase offset, repeat. Stop when no low values are found. Simple as that.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, sounds good. Moon washed out last nights images so waiting for Moon to disappear before experimenting further.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Nikolas74
      As I am ready to invest in this new CMOS camera from ZWO the Asi2600mc pro , I am trying to understand why this camera will be better than a DSLR with a filter Infront....
      How this camera will give me better images ?
      I have used DSLR camera some years ago , when I was starting this hobby but after that I have been through mono ccd's , since the time I realized that unfortunately due to lack of time I can not continue with mono imaging and filters....
      So I am thinking to give it a try with a brand new, let's say technology of Color CMOS and see what I can get out of it....
      I see some really nice examples on the net but am I going to achieve them ?
      The Zwo Asi294mc pro widely used around the world is also very promising...Discontinued already as I hear...Amp glow issues....is it really so annoying ?cheaper than the new asi2600 MC pro by half price....
      So can someone persuade me that the Zwo Asi2600mc pro is better than the others ? 🤔
    • By KEJ
      Hi
      Can I please ask, is there anyone out there with the following or a similar setup to this:
       
      William Optics Z61 Scope + WO 61A Flattener + ZWO ASI533MC Pro (or other ZWO Camera) ?  
      Currently,  I have been using the following setup:
      William Optics Z61 Scope + WO 61A Flattener + Nikon DSLR
        However, by the end of the week I am hoping to have this new setup:
      William Optics Z61 Scope + WO 61A Flattener + ZWO ASI533MC Pro
        I was really just wondering how the more experienced out there had configured/connected their equipment together?
      How people connect their ZWO cameras to the flatteners?
      Are the flatteners still required with the smaller sensor cameras ?
      I was just wondering if anyone has any pictures of similar setups to above please (equipment trains)?
       
      Thanks in advance for any comments or advice.
    • By johnnyvmass
      Question, is my pier out of level if I'm trying to PA (with asiair pro) and both directions are moving when I adjust the alt bolts? I can't get the mount polar aligned.
      Mount neq6 pro
      Pier mounted on a concrete slab
      OTA c8 with .63 reducer
      Camera asi294mc pro
      Zwo OAG
      Thanks in advance
    • By Padraic M
      How can I set up APT so that it always connects by default to my imaging camera? I have an irritating problem that APT will regularly connect to my guide camera, even though that camera is already connected in Phd2.
      I have created two APT shortcuts on the desktop, one specifying camera 2 (which usually is the guidecam) and the other specifying camera 1 (which is usually the imaging camera), but it looks like cameras 1 and 2 are not absolutely assigned to the ASI1600mm (imaging) and ASI290MC (guiding).
      At APT startup, in the log it will say 'Connected to ASI1600mm' and then imediately say 'sensor size 5.6mmx3.2mm'. Then I know I have a problem as it's obviously not the 1600! I can usually sort it out by disconnecting, Shift-Connecting (to get the camera selection dialog), and selecting cameras 1 and 2 until I get the correct sensor size.
      There must be a better way?
    • By ntaylorblanchard
      Note on this issue: A suggestion from another forum seems to have found the problem but I'm not sure. It was suggested that after 3 hours my power tank was drained enough to inhibit the operation of the cooler. I attached my second (smaller) power tank and it seems to be working now. Of course the camera sat for awhile before I was given the idea that power was the issue and decided to try a test with a new power source.  If anyone has any additional information or suggestion for me they would be appreciated.  Original issue is below:
       
      HELP PLEASE! ASI294 MC Pro Stopped cooling Also have an image saving issue. I'll try to give as much detail as I can:
      Using APT with an ASI294 MC Pro - CAMERA IS NEW
      Cooler is powered by a Celestron Powertank 17 fully charged connected using an Orion DC cable w/Auto Lighter Plug
      Connecting via ASCOM ASI Camera 1 setting
      Properties are
      Image Type RAW 16
      Bayer RGGB
      Unity Gain
      Gain 120
      Offset 30
      USB limit 40
      The camera is plugged directly into the laptop NOT a USB hub. I believe all my laptops USB ports are USB 2.0
      No other software (such as PHD2) was running.
      No other cameras attached.

      Trying to create a dark library.
      Cooling to -5C from room temp of around 25-30C
      Camera and cooler were working fine for a couple of hours but I then ran into a snag:
       
      I got a time-out message from APT saying "Still waiting image from the camera - 30s" also -
      The cooling stopped working. (Red light indicating power is still on. Fan is still spinning.)
      I'm also noticing that the laptop is making the chime noise it makes when something is unplugged or plugged in.
       
      I tried connecting to the camera just using APT's ZWO camera setting with the same results.
      Black level and USB speed settings were left blank.
       
      Disconnecting and reconnecting everything seems to fix the problem only for a minute then I'm right back into the same problem. Changing USB ports does not help.
       
      I tried using ZWO's "ASI Studio" and I did not seem to have any problems capturing images but the cooler didn't seem to be working. (Power was = 100%)
      I tried using Sharpcap and did not seem to be able to do anything but I'm very unfamiliar with that software.
       
      I went back to APT and tried doing 10 lights exposures of 30 sec each with no power to the cooler. Those went ok. I then connected the cooler. The cooler cooled the camera down to 23.2C then stopped.
      Cooling Aid settings are
      Target -5
      Step 5
      Pause 5
      Timeout 120 (also tried timeout 300)
      Disconnected the cooler and ran another set of 10 30 sec light subs. These went ok. Tried set of 10 10 sec darks without cooler. This also went ok.
      I tried reinstalling the ASCOM drivers from the ASI site, restarted the laptop, restarted APT. Camera cooled from around 30C to 25.3C then stopped cooling (Red light indicating power is still on. Fan is still spinning.) I again started hearing the plugged/unplugged chimes from the laptop.
      So right now this seems to be some issue with the cooling. Is the camera defective?
      While I'm not computer illiterate, I'm not highly technical. I'd appreciate any help or advice but please put it into simple straightforward terms.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.