Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Evoguide 50ED Field Flattener


Recommended Posts

The Evoguide 50ED has had a short use now on the Virtuoso mount with the Canon 1100d.

Whilst the sky was clear there was a lot of low mist, live in a hollow, and even though I was on Mars with a Lord Y mask the central spike didn't really show even on taking an image (I will add a picture later as it is on my phone).

Screenshot_2018-10-10-19-36-48.thumb.png.8a21a8fe46f9af228b658d66f641cb27.png

Lovely crisp stars in the middle but terrible corner fall off though it starts quite close to the middle, certainly well in from the normal expected image rotation area cropped from what I use. So a field flattener would be good to add, but here lies the problem.....back focus distance. General testing has shown that the back focus really is only around 60mm.

Canon 1100d 44mm, T ring 10mm, T mount 3mm, focus travel for infinity 4mm.

If i mix the T ring straight to the T2 thread on the ED50 I gain like 3mm!

What I have not been able to find out is how much back focus do straight through field flatteners actually take up.

30 second image attached.

IMG_4853.thumb.JPG.a5a226a13afe9b70fef457fcfd5db3b1.JPG

Edited by happy-kat
Added Lord Y mask image on Mars
Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK thank you. It does look that way it is not suited to being treated as a large lens/small refractor for occasional images with my DSLR. I was expecting some distortion but not the amount there is, perhaps I should have tried to calculate the amount up front first. Even using 300% lens correction in StarTools is not enough to pull the shapes out.

Edited by happy-kat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice topic... I always wanted to try attaching it to my Canon 1300D...

Most of the websites have description line like this: "It can also be used as a finderscope, small lens for your camera or just as a small richfield telescope for travelling!"

Does not look like it can be "small lens for your camera" at all :( 

Unless it's a small chip size one ... like ZWO 224 or similar.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 years later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.