Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

QHY5-III290C & Sharpcap


Recommended Posts

Hi all - it seems like ages since I posted anything but a poorly Missus takes priority.

I've just bought a new QHY5-III290C camera (which is a thing of beauty in itself). I went outside a couple of evenings ago eager to get some first light going through the thing.

I've attached the initial image from the camera and Sharpcap and I'm looking for this forums expertise.

So the kit set up consists of:

Skywatcher Pro 150mm Maksutov-Cassegrain OTA
EQ5 Mount and tracking
Said QHYIII290C camera
IR filter

Object in question is M15 in Pegasus. Taken with the camera using Sharpcap then processed in Deep Sky Stacker.

100 x Lights (sub 1 second) plus 20 darks.

If someone could take a look at the attached picture and share some views. Theres a lot of noise in the image which is my main query. Wondering whether its caused at the camera end, the sharpcap and or in post production.

This is a first image so wasn't expecting it to be pretty - just happy to get an image on the chip !

If you need anymore info let me know.

Thanks in advance

Steve

 

 

 

 

Autosave002.tif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies you two. 

John, Camerasettings.txt below:

[QHY5III290C]
Debayer Preview=On
Output Format=SER file (*.ser)
Binning=1x1
Capture Area=1920x1080
Colour Space=RAW16
Pan=0
Tilt=0
Force Still Mode=Off
Enable Live Broadcast=Off
USB Traffic=9
Offset=80
Amp Noise Reduction=On
Frame Rate Limit=15 fps
Gain=555
Exposure=1084.4717743731
Timestamp Frames=Off
White Bal (B)=64
White Bal (G)=64
White Bal (R)=64
Contrast=0
Brightness=0
Gamma=1
Apply Flat=None
Subtract Dark=None
#Black Point
Display Black Point=0
#MidTone Point
Display MidTone Point=0.5
#White Point
Display White Point=1
TimeStamp=2018-10-10T20:16:54.1040419Z
SharpCapVersion=3.1.5219.0

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suppose the camera is geared up for guiding or planetary imaging via video recording. You might get better results by using longer exposures and stacking lots of them but it's probably not very good for dso imaging. It might be ok for live stacking (I've not much experience of that though I have a minicam5s which is a cooled qhy5l-ii mono cam. Even cooled, the images I got from it were noisy. )

Louise

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Louise -the camera has a really sensitive chip which enables some DSO astrophotography as you can see the images on screen. I've reached out to QHY on the noise issue. I'll  definitely be extending the exposure times next time I'm out.

Steve 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jarvo said:

Hi Louise -the camera has a really sensitive chip which enables some DSO astrophotography as you can see the images on screen. I've reached out to QHY on the noise issue. I'll  definitely be extending the exposure times next time I'm out.

Steve 

Try maybe 30s x 120 next time - that will give you 60mins integration time. Plus calibration frames, of course :). The sensitivity of the chip is the reason that qhy brand it as a guide/planetary camera. It will do video of bright planets on the one hand and exposures of 1.5-3s as a guide cam on the other. You could also try the camera with PHD2.

Louise

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.