Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_the_milky_way_winners.thumb.jpg.0a840852a676f881f4a849dd8099085d.jpg

Recommended Posts

Hi all!

I'm about to embark on my first narrowband imaging session tonight.  

If you're happy to share, I'd be interested to know the one thing you wish you had been told before you started with narrowband, what challenge it caused you and how you overcame that challenge?

For some context, I've been imaging LRGB to now so have some general experience.

Tonight, I'll be using an ed80 pro refractor with 0.85 reducer, moonlite focuser and motor, OAG, asi185mc guidecam, efw, asi1600mm-c on an azeq6gt.  Filters are baader ha 7nm, OIII 8.5nm and Si 8nm, all 1.25".

I'll be using sharpcap to polar align and SGP for acquisition.  Current expected target is Elephant's Trunk.

Thanks all!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would get your focus spot on and then don't be afraid to push your sub length to 30 mins if your mount alignment and guiding is good enough.

Good luck and keep trying if it doesn't go well the 1st time!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Use long enough but not too long exposures and use the right gain..  I use Unity Gain and exposures of 5 or 10 minutes with my ASI600 for narrowband, seems to work well.. the longer exposures give me smoother images for the same total integration time, although I don’t know why this is..  quite a few posts on here about what settings to use, 200 gain 50 offset used by others.. 

Dave

 

 

Edited by Laurin Dave

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I like 30 min NB subs with some CCD cameras but CMOS won't thrive on them. Watch your focus like a hawk and save Ha for the moon if you're running out of time. OIII is much less moon proof.

Olly

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

I have a QHY163m which is similar to your camera and find I can push exposures to 600s at G100 OS 70 (not sure what the ASI equivalent is) - more than this and the amp glow becomes too much for comfort. As others have said, watch your focus! I use a Bahtinov at Bin 1:1 and expose for 20s or so to get strong spikes. Filter used is a Baader 7nm.

Even though the general opinion seems to favour high numbers of high gain, short exposures with CMOS cameras, I still prefer the results I get using longer, lower gain ones. I feel the results are smoother and deeper, but that's probably just me 😊

My standard HA sub settings for CMOS are 600s, -15C, G100, OS70 at around f/3. When using my QHY9m (CCD, KAF8300) I'll go for 1200-1500s subs at -20C.

HTH

Rich

Edited by RichLD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Focus.  Focus.  Focus.  And then check that focus, especially if you are working at f6 or less.  I’ve learned that “good enough” usually isn’t.  And it’s certainly worth rechecking during an imaging session - autumn can give you a 15 degree difference in ambient temperature over a six-hour session and it can be frustrating to sift through a pile of subs and see the star sizes gradually getting bigger and your fine nebulosity vanishing.

If your budget and set-up lends itself to a motorised/automated focusser then go for it.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks all.  Focus it is! 

I've changed target to Heart Nebula, and looking at the "Valve" in particular.  No reason other than my house being in the way of Elephant's Trunk.  Got mixed up on my planning!

Anyway, I'm going with 18 x 300s exposures with on each filter for the sequence, with autofocus every 10 frames and on filter change and dither every 6 frames.  The first sub just came through:  https://jbconsult-my.sharepoint.com/:u:/g/personal/jbro1985_jbconsult_onmicrosoft_com/ETn2zxEcdGRNnDx7gyPomBMBvW_ztxonQ-NSGJoO2eMYAw?e=O9jh6I

Fingers crossed.  I won't get time to process until the weekend.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Dave.  Elongating towards the top right, I think.  Seems to be getting a bit better frame by frame.

I've just got the mount back from repair (motherboard blew) / tuning and it's still running in with the new greasing etc. so guiding is a little off.  Phd2 also needs a recalibration for the same reason... backlash has been dialed out etc.  though it's giving me an RMS of 0.7 and gradually coming down.

I'm going to live with it for tonight and look to get the guiding all set up perfectly at the weekend, if there's a clear sky. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jason

I've got an AZEQ6.... maybe the Dec is bouncing... mine does unless balance is quite camera heavy.  Or maybe there's a bit of flex in the system, my ZWO OAG top wobbles on the stem even with the grub and locking screws really tight.. I think they should be at right angles (like the ones securing the stem top the OAG body)rather than facing each other across the stem. I wedged a bit of paper between the OAG stem and the top and it no longer does..  

 

Dave

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

I'll definitely check that our.  I get a tiny bit of wobble, OAG is facing upwards with the camera on top when scope is parked.  Does this look familiar?

image.png.ae2d768779b40aaf939b6f87552e4017.png

Edited by Jbro1985
Additional info

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, my Dec is always worse than RA... and I sometimes get a PHD graph like that.  If I do I recalibrate, and put a bit more weight camera ended rising side.  I also use 1" guide camera exposures...  chases the seeing but stops the mount going AWOL.

Dave

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, SGP did it's thing.  Ended up with 18 ha, 18 OIII and 4 SII subs.  Meridian flip failed whilst I was sleeping. 

I expected some buggeration because I've just set everything up from scratch on a remote PC so I'm not too frustrated with that.  I know the issue so can hopefully test and confirm.

I'll post the final image over the weekend.  Tempted not to integrate the SII into the final image due to the lack of data but was good skies last night so I will see how it all looks in SHO before rowing back to HO.

Thanks for your help last night Dave!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You mightened need such long exposures with the ASI1600. Ten minutes will get a lot of data and more subs can help with smoothing out the noise compared to fewer longer subs.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Zakalwe. 

I acquired 5 minute / 300s subs.  Did you mean 10 mins or 5 mins when you said about shortening?  I'm keen to find the optimal exposure.

Edited by Jbro1985

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's my first very quick processing.  Darks used but I haven't applied flats etc and I only spent about an hour on it.  Lots more work to be done and the data isn't amazing.  Good practice though.  I've blown out the core a little on this one.700608008_HeartNeb.thumb.jpg.243f05e55e1b4f2c4415c3dc2ed76eba.jpg

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Jbro1985
      I am going through the motions of properly processing my first narrowband image.  Perhaps there is no difference here to LRGB, but I am curious as to which method people favour for their work-flow and why:
      A:  Combine the channels (using SHO palette in my sitution) and then apply DBE; or
      B:  Apply DBE to each channel and then combine?
      Mainly interested in nebulae.
      Thanks in advance for any thoughts on this.
    • By Jonesdee
      Having acquired an ASI 1600MM Pro earlier in the year, this is my first attempt at a wide field Ha/OIII bicolour, using a Borg 55FL scope.  15 x 240s Ha and 15 x 240s OIII, integrated and combined in APP and edited in Star Tools.  I assigned Ha to the Red Channel and OIII to Blue and Green, but would be grateful for any tips on combining channels for bi-colour images. 
      I  also tried combining with the LRGB Tool in Star Tools, assigning Ha to Red and OIII to Green, allowing STar Tools to synthesise the missing data.  The result was interesting, but did not produce the 'traditional' Red/Cyan colours of this target.
       
      Apologies, maybe someone can advise how I can insert the image into this post, rather than have it as an attachment please?
      Cheers
      Dave

    • By Xiga
      Hey-ho
      So then, just as i thought the DSO season was well and truly over for me until late August/early September, as it turned out last Saturday night (May 5th) was mostly clear, so i set about trying to finish the NAN image i had captured in Ha a while back (see thread below):
      So all i needed was some OIII. It's obviously not the ideal time of year to capture this i know, as it's so low on the horizon, but beggar's can't be choosers so i tried my best to make the most of the small amount of astro dark time available and just make the best of it.
      In the end i managed 9 subs, two of which were sub-standard due to passing clouds, but as is my want these days i still asked APP to stack them (using the Quality setting) and it didn't seem to affect things. So in total this is:
      Ha: 7 x 480s, 6 x 1200, 13 x 1200 (a little over 7 Hrs)
      OIII: 9 x 1200s (3 Hrs)
      RGB (with IDAS-D1 filter): 20 x 60s
      The usual Flats & Bias, stacked in APP and processed in PS. 
      Gear used: Nikon D5300 (modded); SW 80ED (510mm FL); HEQ5-Pro; SGPro and PHD2. 
      The RGB subs were used solely for the stars. I still need to get better at merging them with the NB channels, i'm not as good as i'd like to be at controlling them. Although in this instance, i did mask the stretching of them, and it definitely helped, but i need to practice this to get better at it. I think the fact that the RGB stack (even at just 20 mins) contained some nebulosity didn't help things. When it's just stars and nothing else, it's so much simpler to combine them.
      So this is just a Version 1 for now (i'll try an sSHO next). I used Ha for Red, OIII for Blue, and used one of Carboni's Actions to synthesize the Green channel. Then went round and round in circles trying to find a colour balance to my liking (on my rubbish monitor!) so i'd love to hear what you guys think. Too dark? Too much saturation? (i tend to do that, lol). I also couldn't decide on orientation, so have included two different ones. Which do you guys prefer?
      All C&C welcome. Don't hold back! I'm always looking for ways to improve. 
      Clear skies!


    • By Vicky050373
      M97 The Owl Nebula in Ursa Major imaged 04.05.2018
      William Optics FLT-110 refractor and Atik 314L monochrome CCD with Baader narrowband filters
      10 x 300 seconds H-Alpha, 10 x 300 seconds H-Beta and 10 x 300 seconds OIII
      Assigned to R, G & B channels respectively to give a false colour image.
    • By Vicky050373
      Managed a reasonably decent imaging session last weekend and had a go at one of my favourite little targets
      M97 The Owl Nebula in Ursa Major imaged 04.05.2018
      William Optics FLT-110 refractor and Atik 314L monochrome CCD with Baader narrowband filters
      10 x 300 seconds H-Alpha, 10 x 300 seconds H-Beta and 10 x 300 seconds OIII
      Assigned to R, G & B channels respectively to give a false colour image

×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.