Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Flats doing my head in


Recommended Posts

I need some help pinpointing this problem. I know my WO71 scope has some issues in the imaging path, but I've been able to take some decent pictures with it in NB. However, lately I had fun with M31 in LRGB and as I started processing the lum my flats went nuts on me.

I have used the same set of images (bias, dark, flat and light) to produce the two different stacks below. One is PI batch stacked, the other is DSS. I did an automatic background extraction on both and STF them, and I STF'ed the master flat they produce as well beside them.

DSS:

image.thumb.png.32250eb585cbb057950b84290bc4a088.pngimage.thumb.png.37247b694bdc456b6b99492adf0842ee.png

PI:

image.thumb.png.a367198f3fda04303809b783bfbf8349.pngimage.thumb.png.8ff19e48899493333e18bc4ed606c9f1.png

What's doing my head in is the difference in stacked pictures and how it looks. I can work with the DSS version with some masking trickery, but the PI stack is total nonsense to me. If anyone has some golden nuggets of advice, I'm all ears.

For comparison, here is a PI stacked Ha in progress of Elephant trunk. None of this madness I'm seeing in the other stacks. All images and stacks were made with the same setup, no differences in moving camera around or anything. Different flats, obviously.:

image.thumb.png.d1e5d3ea6fd5f5da73b08ec7c894593a.png

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both flats look very similar to me, so surely something else is going on with the second image? You say you used DBE... The dark area around the galaxy in the 1st image looks typical of DBE when it gets confused and includes the object in its measurements of the background. Have you tried without? The second image, not a clue what's going on there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Shibby said:

Both flats look very similar to me, so surely something else is going on with the second image? You say you used DBE... The dark area around the galaxy in the 1st image looks typical of DBE when it gets confused and includes the object in its measurements of the background. Have you tried without? The second image, not a clue what's going on there.

Right, here is the DSS without DBE, with STF. By no means a perfect starting point.:

image.png.d8a228cfe0e773465724f7e112dbf9b2.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I thought I could handle this remaining stuff, but this being my first RGB image, I am pondering whether I just never ever do RGB again or if my current skies are too polluted for it. This is the result of Lum + RGB:

image.thumb.png.380ecee8ee49328c7beccc861cba7946.png

Send help...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.