Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

Owmuchonomy

The Trapezium with the SW ED150

Recommended Posts

The new SW Evostar ED150 is really getting some use here after my initial tests.  We are having a good run of clear skies.  This morning I got up at 3:30 am to do a lunar imaging run (see elsewhere). After that I quickly set up on M42 as it was near the local meridian.  Using my ES 4.7mm 82' EP (255x) I concentrated on the Trapezium first.  I was staggered by the view not only because of the detail under the Moon but because all 6 stars (A to F) were clearly visible immediately and pin sharp sitting in a greenish mist.  Here is my really quite poor chalk sketch of the approximate view hastily drawn on my obsy blackboard wall (ignore the screws in the ply):

IMG_1789.jpg.c0b41a637d8f5ea4b400d2a5e19430c0.jpg

Checking with the detailed Whitepeak Observatory graphic the stars I believe in clockwise order are from the top right: B, D, F, C, A, E.  I have often tried to view the 6 stars before with my SCT 9.25" but this scope revealed them with ease.

Star C (Theta-1 C Orionis) is described in the same graphic as an Extreme star: 40 Solar Masses; Surface temp 40,000K, the hottest known <6mag star; 210,000x sun's luminosity and an O6 spectral type.

I then swapped to my 2" 24mm ES 82' EP to view M42 but that view was swamped somewhat by moonlight so I will have to wait a while to try that.

 

  • Like 9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

This is probably a bit of a stupid question, but how apo is it? I've heard people suggesting it wouldn't be good on stars because of its large lens. Is this the case? ?

John

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, JohnSadlerAstro said:

Hi,

This is probably a bit of a stupid question, but how apo is it? I've heard people suggesting it wouldn't be good on stars because of its large lens. Is this the case? ?

John

It's very well controlled. I haven't been able to detect any real chromatic aberration, perhaps a faint violet on the brightest stars.  its as good as my ED120 was.  A bright Moon limb didn't phase it either.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good stuff Chris.

My ED120 shows E & F Trapezium but they are somewhat harder with my Tak 100. Doable on a good night though.

Although the 2 ED150's that I had were out of sorts optically I did notice that false colour was well controlled with them. If Skywatcher can sort out the packaging so that 100% of the scopes arrive in optically good shape I think it will be a winner :icon_biggrin:

 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been very lucky I think.  This is an excellent example of what the scope is capable of.  I noticed on screen when I had the ASI290MM camera on for the Click-Lock test that the airy disc was spot on.  I have some Moon images to sort out so that will be my next post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That`s a good result, I`ve struggled to observe the stars C, A, E. with my 9.25SCT. But B,D, and F visible in a Badder Hyperion 10mm at x235. Des

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm rather surprised that C9.25's are struggling with E & F Trapezium :icon_scratch:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, John said:

I'm rather surprised that C9.25's are struggling with E & F Trapezium :icon_scratch:

The joys of cooling and perhaps collimation John. I've always found SCTs struggle with these more than refractors, particularly F which requires good control of C to pull it out of the glare.

Best view I've had of these by far is through Gav's TEC160. No surprise I guess!

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, John said:

I'm rather surprised that C9.25's are struggling with E & F Trapezium :icon_scratch:

I can mount the 9.25 next to the 150 on the AZ EQ 6 GT ?.  I have recently collimated the 9.25 too so I'll put it on the to do list.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, des anderson said:

That`s a good result, I`ve struggled to observe the stars C, A, E. with my 9.25SCT. But B,D, and F visible in a Badder Hyperion 10mm at x235. Des

Des, A,B,C and D are trivial in just about any scope so I'm sure you must be seeing them? It is E and F that are the challenge, with E generally being easier than F in my view.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

These old eye`s ar`nt as good as they used to be, but winters coming and I`m up for a challange. Maybe the scope needs a tweak or I do......Des

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My best views of E & F come with my 12" dob unsurprisingly. They are really "in your face" with that scope !

Regularly seen with the ED120 as well though. As with many of these targets, once you have seen them, you wonder how you missed them !

I agree with Stu - even my old Tasco 60mm would show A-D quite nicely.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This observation is massively seeing-dependent and does require optics to be at ambient as well. I'm not surpized that the 6 inch apo handled itself so well.

Olly

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very dependent on magnification as well, too much or too little and E & F seem to disappear.    ?

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Peter Drew said:

Very dependent on magnification as well, too much or too little and E & F seem to disappear.    ?

Too true. 8mm (199x) seems to be spot on for E & F with my 12" dob.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 01/10/2018 at 20:46, Stu said:

Des, A,B,C and D are trivial in just about any scope so I'm sure you must be seeing them? It is E and F that are the challenge, with E generally being easier than F in my view.

 

Fully agree, ABC&D easy at 19x with my Pronto.    OO 10” Dob E&F easy at 150-200x but only if seeing is ok.  

Always a treat, however many times I view them......?

Ed.

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I often use Rigel as a guide to seeing. If I can split that easily and also see the 4th star of Sigma Orionis (just below the lowest of the 3 "belt" stars), E & F Trapezium are usually "on" that night :icon_biggrin:

Can't wait for Orion to start showing properly - there is so much to see in that constellation !

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, John said:

I often use Rigel as a guide to seeing. If I can split that easily and also see the 4th star of Sigma Orionis (just below the lowest of the 3 "belt" stars), E & F Trapezium are usually "on" that night :icon_biggrin:

Can't wait for Orion to start showing properly - there is so much to see in that constellation !

i agree John, Orion has to be my favourite, and seeing the Pleiades starting to rise ahead of Orion always gives me a little tinge of excited anticipation..:thumbsup::hello2:

Dave

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good seeing tonight, not even fully dark, waiting for the Moon to clear building I was looking at Rigel, Sig Ori...and then Trapezium. 7mm T6...and saw E and F, caught me by complete surprise!

Bumping to 150x it was even more obvious. I am still stunned.

I guess it is seeing...and Tak fluorite magic. :)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice one !

I've just pointed my 12 dobsonian at it and E & F were surprisingly easy considering the twilight sky.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By merlin100
      I'm tempted to go down the route of getting myself a brand new reflector...  My friend's old Meade 114/900 is a good telescope, but I want something of my own and with a bit more light gathering power.  To this end, I've been looking at a couple of different models and manufactures.  
      https://www.firstlightoptics.com/beginner-telescopes/skywatcher-explorer-130.html
      https://www.firstlightoptics.com/beginner-telescopes/skywatcher-explorer-130p.html
      https://www.firstlightoptics.com/reflectors/skywatcher-explorer-130m.html
      https://www.amazon.co.uk/Meade-Instruments-Polaris-Reflector-Telescope/dp/B01FG8JEGG
      I must admit, the Skywatcher Explorer 130M floats my boat, as it's motorised with a speed controller.
      Any thoughts or observations?🤔
    • By stevebb
      Celestron C8 XLT + extras and SkyWatcher Star Travel 80 (ST80)
      I have a Celestron C8 with XLT Starbrite coatings. Will include the full length base plate, both visual and imaging backs, scope rings, front 8" end cap and the finder scope with it. No box I'm afraid. Optics are good and clean, focal length is huge - 2300mm from memory. This lot would cost close to £1300 new and one with less spec went for £750 on fleabay recently. Might be interested in a part exchange or will let it go for £450 collection only.
      Also, I have a SkyWatcher Star Traveler 80 - good optics, used as a guide scope - just the scope itself (does not include the barlow in the photo) - now including dovetail bar and scope rings looking at around £50 for it.
      I have decided to save up for another refractor, WO, Equinox or even toward an Esprit. However, I would also consider p/ex for an Intel NUC and/or Pegasus Astro Pocket Powerbox.
      Please excuse some of the colours - I used my astro modded 6D which was in the observatory so the "nice" purple is actually black !!
      Both these are collection only.




    • By Clear Skies!
      I am going to buy Skywatcher EQ5 Pro Go-To mount. But, unfortunately, I am low on budget.
      So, does someone know where can I buy the cheapest EQ5 pro mount?
      Yesterday there was a low price for it (350 €), but they changed it.
      Thank you for your time!
    • By Bruno Marin
      I found this setup in internet and make me think, with AZEQ6 GT and 2 scopes, different weights and size, without counterweight in AZ mode! 
      - I can put a MAK100mm 3kg +- and a OO VX10l  12kg +- without counterweight?
       
      Does anyone have this setup mount and already used without counterweight with two telescopes of different weights? Is it really necessary to have a balance using in AZ mode?
      The problem to centralize the object with both scopes is true? With the SW AZEQ6 GT?
      Follow the images
      a TSA-120 with 6.5 kg i think and the other with 22kg i forgot the brand hehe you can help me?
       


    • By AstroRuz
      £180
      Selling a nice portable wide telescope with great glass and a great field of view
      I have two telescopes and I'm using the 80ED more currently and so this Telescope just isn't getting used anymore
      It has a longer dovetail (originally from the 80ED) so declination balance can be reached.
      Great performer for the price
      Collection only as P&P is like £40 (Northamptonshire - UK)
      Selling to fund a scope or mount upgrade.🤔
      Selling





×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.