ollypenrice Posted September 21, 2018 Share Posted September 21, 2018 One of my robotic clients has a Baby Q working at just over F5 and a QSI583 with OAG. He has a mixed set of filters, so Baader LRGB and Astrodon Ha. The OAG is scope-side of the filters. He's finding that he can't guide with the Astrodon filter selected in the imaging camera. My guess is that there is too much difference in focus position between the Astrodon and the other filters, throwing the guide camera too far out of focus. Can anyone confirm that this can be a problem or should we be looking elsewhere? I've never used a QSI myself. Thanks, Olly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swag72 Posted September 21, 2018 Share Posted September 21, 2018 I've got a mixed bag of filters in my QSI...... Baader RGB, Hutech IDAS for luminance and Astrodon narrowband. I can see the difference in focus when I change over filters but it's not so bad that it can't guide. I *think* I probably focussed the OAG with the IDAS filter and was perhaps lucky that the focus isn't too far out for the other filters. I would think the difference in the focus point is the issue..... should be easy enough to get a middle focus point on the OAG that will satisfy PHD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vlaiv Posted September 21, 2018 Share Posted September 21, 2018 At F/5 critical focus zone is about 60um (or 1/16th of a millimeter), so no doubt that different filters will have different focus, filters add about 1/3rd of their thickness to the optical light path, so difference in thickness of more than 1/5 mm will throw the focus off. Having said that, I've found that PHD2 is very resilient to poor OAG focus. My OAG is "focused" by manually moving T2 connector up/down the stalk (sliding motion so it can't be precise) and I've never had any issues with guiding, even at F/4.5. To add to that, stars at the edge of the field are very distorted, but centroid algorithm seems not to care (it just needs to calculate "center" position of whatever star shape and monitor it's movement frame to frame, so it does not care if it is true star center). Slight guide star defocus can help with seeing, so it is sometimes recommended for brighter guide stars. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steppenwolf Posted September 21, 2018 Share Posted September 21, 2018 I have the 683 and a mixed bag of filters including Astrodon, Baader, Astronomik and an IDAS LP filter. I calibrated focus between guide and imaging camera using the IDAS and have never had any guide focus issue, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davey-T Posted September 21, 2018 Share Posted September 21, 2018 I use my QSI683 with integrated filter wheel with Baader LRGB and Astrodon NB filters focussing is different for imaging but not enough to affect the OAG indeed PHD guides on some very strange looking stars. Dave Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ollypenrice Posted September 21, 2018 Author Share Posted September 21, 2018 OK, thanks folks. That's a big help. It looks as if the problem will be lying elsewhere. We'll take a look. Olly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jkulin Posted September 21, 2018 Share Posted September 21, 2018 Can I be thick? I have just switched over to OAG guiding and as my prism is in front of the filters, the type of filter has no affect on the guiding, the focus changes a tiny bit but that's it. I was using my G2-8300 MkII with a Celestron OAG and that was working fine, but should have back my new Moravian MKII OAG that again goes in front of the filters, does the QSI go before them then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davey-T Posted September 21, 2018 Share Posted September 21, 2018 Yes the QSI prism is in front of the filters but the whole focus point moves slightly when focusing different filters so moves the prism at the same time, not enough to affect the guide camera focus. Dave Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jkulin Posted September 21, 2018 Share Posted September 21, 2018 Thanks Dave, so yes you get a slight change in focus, but I've found PHD2 copes with it admirably, in fact it almost helps, if it was out much, then I would pause and refocus the OAG a touch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.