Jump to content

Moving from CCD to Cmos


Sarum

Recommended Posts

Owing to limited funds when I needed to replace my QHY 8 Pro, I decided to go with an ASI 1600mc Pro cmos camera.   From the moment that I opened the box it was obvious that the build quality was far superior to the QHY camera,  but now the learning curve begins!   This is an image from last night consisting of 30  five minute subs.  I'm reasonably pleased with final result, although the strong halos around the brighter stars are bit of a distraction.  Most of the tips for removing star halos seem to be for images taken with a refractor, but if anyone knows how to remove star halos on images taken with a Newtonian I'd be grateful .

RoyNGC6910.thumb.jpg.2a75e7b33022f9d69c42692cd34f88eb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Sarum said:

Owing to limited funds when I needed to replace my QHY 8 Pro, I decided to go with an ASI 1600mc Pro cmos camera.   From the moment that I opened the box it was obvious that the build quality was far superior to the QHY camera,  but now the learning curve begins!   This is an image from last night consisting of 30  five minute subs.  I'm reasonably pleased with final result, although the strong halos around the brighter stars are bit of a distraction.  Most of the tips for removing star halos seem to be for images taken with a refractor, but if anyone knows how to remove star halos on images taken with a Newtonian I'd be grateful .

RoyNGC6910.thumb.jpg.2a75e7b33022f9d69c42692cd34f88eb.jpg

Are you using a Skywatcher Coma corrector?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, blinky said:

From what I read this is a common problem with these cameras - the CCD CMOS does not have anti reflection coating on it.  I think what was suggested was to use lower bit more exposures

That's certainly worth trying, perhaps shorter exposures and more of them will help.

Roy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I heard about the coating too, actually, that's probably the reason.

I usually go with 1/2 minutes exposures with that camera, that might explain why I rarely saw star halos.

It's also a general pattern with CMOS cameras anyway: since the read noise is usually very low, it is usually preferred to take more shorter exposures, rather than fewer longer ones.

This also help increasing the dynamic range (this camera has a 12bits only ADC, so stacking more exposures helps a lot) and getting more "valuable" frames (you'll have more tolerance against tracking issues, or satellites/planes passing through your field).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Sarum said:

Thanks Richard.  Adam I'm using a Baader coma corrector coupled with a Baader UHC-S filter (2 inch).  The scope is SW 200PDS.

Roy

Which version are you using? The original and mk2 both produce reflections, the new MPCCMKIII has better coatings. 

The UHC-S is a visual filter and has not IR block and so depending on if your camera has a IR cut window or not that might cause it. Not sure if Astronomik are as diligent with AR coatings on the filters made mostly for visual. The coma corrector could well be interacting with the filter.

The other possibility is that its the camera, 1600 sensors are not AR coated, if that is the case the there is nothing that you can do about it. The change in shape of the reflection as it moves across the image slightly discounts this though. 

Those are the only possibilities really 

Its still a lovely image though. :)

Adam

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, blinky said:

From what I read this is a common problem with these cameras - the CCD CMOS does not have anti reflection coating on it.  I think what was suggested was to use lower bit more exposures

Its a problem with the Panasonic chips not CMOS chips in general, sony are fine as an example. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Many thanks for the info Adam. 

I'll see what I can do with the optical side of things, but if all else fails I may have to live with the reflections and try to minimise them during processing.

Roy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.